Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cop Drives Right at Suspect, Runs Him Over in Disturbing Dash Cam Video [View all]CherokeeDem
(3,732 posts)123. I saw that episode of Mythbusters....
No one has claimed it wasn't difficult to kill someone this way or that it is common... just that it can and has occurred.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cop Drives Right at Suspect, Runs Him Over in Disturbing Dash Cam Video [View all]
one_voice
Apr 2015
OP
This is what happens when you "stand by" and don't respond to a maniac with a rifle
951-Riverside
Apr 2015
#138
The one officer giving the command for other officers to "stand by" put them and the public at risk
951-Riverside
Apr 2015
#139
It means you just watched a cop smash into a man at ~60 MPH and your response is "FUCK YEAH! UNF!"
Scootaloo
Apr 2015
#155
The cop deserves to be prosecuted for assault with a dangerous weapon and assault with intent to
morningfog
Apr 2015
#11
He chose to stop an armed gunman who already shot his gun without killing this gunman.
LisaL
Apr 2015
#18
"Shoot to wound" is a fantasy indicating that someone watches too many cop shows.
11 Bravo
Apr 2015
#118
Nah, the best fantasy is a cop and armed suspect staring down barrels of guns...
Eleanors38
Apr 2015
#149
I'd think an imaginary world consists of only two possibilities-- killing him or running him down.
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#137
The audio is significant - the car closest to him was saying 'stand off'
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#22
He said the guy driving the car was given to okay to run him over with his vehicle?
Buzz Clik
Apr 2015
#58
Exactly. This was a very bad situation that was on the verge of getting worse.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2015
#68
why is that funny to you? Do you think a bullet fired in the air goes into orbit or something?
Takket
Apr 2015
#31
Well, I guess police should have given the suspect some more chances to shoot his gun.
LisaL
Apr 2015
#103
I agree with everything you said. It's amazing how polce brutatlity is justified and defended.
morningfog
Apr 2015
#17
They would have been justified with shooting him at that point because he was in a residential area
LisaL
Apr 2015
#19
More old Colts shot out of hands -- look, Ma, no blood! -- in The Lone Ranger!
Eleanors38
Apr 2015
#150
He wasn't told to stand down!! Just to "stand off"! That is the difference here we should be
GummyBearz
Apr 2015
#128
so no piercing internal organs with a bullet, but with his broken ribs is ok. thanks for clarifying.
uppityperson
Apr 2015
#132
Violent crime has dropped to 50-year lows. These are "Days of [ratings-driven] Dread."
Eleanors38
Apr 2015
#157
running into someone with a day moving car = "non-lethal force"? I'd say tell that to my cousin
uppityperson
Apr 2015
#113
For those that contend: It's impossible to approach a guy with a gun with less than lethal force
My Good Babushka
Apr 2015
#140
It's quite possible his actions could have saved a number of lives.
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2015
#148