Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I cannot view the Democratic Party as serious until... [View all]Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)10. You just survived an alert 0-7.
Last edited Sat Apr 18, 2015, 04:27 PM - Edit history (1)
Hard to believe, but this was alerted on.
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is democratic underground no? These post are becoming more numerous and are a blatant violation of the goal of this website to elect democrats.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Apr 18, 2015, 02:20 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is the person who wrote this alert that concerns me,
a great deal. THINK about what you're suggesting and THINK
about the words this long time poster in excellent standing
has said in his OP. If you come to the conclusion that this
OP and these words should be hidden, we as a party are
doomed. LEAVE IT.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I completely agree with the OP. Blind party loyalty is for slaves and fools.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I didn't know that Democrats discussing their party is against the TOS. Silly alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The goal of this website is to "elect Democrats?" Not to discuss policy and political issues? Has there been a DNC coup around here that nobody told me about? If this post is a violation of TOS I'm in the wrong place.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Why hide a decent post?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The third way may not like it, but he's right.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: WTF? Why the heck was this alerted on?
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is democratic underground no? These post are becoming more numerous and are a blatant violation of the goal of this website to elect democrats.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Apr 18, 2015, 02:20 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is the person who wrote this alert that concerns me,
a great deal. THINK about what you're suggesting and THINK
about the words this long time poster in excellent standing
has said in his OP. If you come to the conclusion that this
OP and these words should be hidden, we as a party are
doomed. LEAVE IT.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I completely agree with the OP. Blind party loyalty is for slaves and fools.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I didn't know that Democrats discussing their party is against the TOS. Silly alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The goal of this website is to "elect Democrats?" Not to discuss policy and political issues? Has there been a DNC coup around here that nobody told me about? If this post is a violation of TOS I'm in the wrong place.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Why hide a decent post?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The third way may not like it, but he's right.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: WTF? Why the heck was this alerted on?
Nice to see such a clear-thinking jury; their views exactly coincide with my own
On Edit: This they're/their error must not stand!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And the best way to do that would be to bring some of our "dear" leaders to justice for what has
jwirr
Apr 2015
#39
I agree. I am sticking with him as long as he is in and if he does not run I plan on supporting him
jwirr
Apr 2015
#46
You, like me, must have the archaic notion that your vote belongs to you.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2015
#24
Hillary hasnt even been nominated yet, but i was asked why am I here the other day
darkangel218
Apr 2015
#54
In 2014, the candidate who spent the most prevailed 94.2 percent of the time
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#15
So you are saying Democrats should not try to win elecitons and let Republicans control everything.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#17
Inconvenient facts. Ask Obama how well that works. And he's taken a lot of crap from people who
libdem4life
Apr 2015
#29
Or the front-runner got most of the donations 94.2% of the time, depending on how you look at it.N/T
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#25
They spent the most money. It appears that hsoe who have teh most money to spend have an
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#26
Or people who already have an advantage get more money. Which is what happens a lot of the time too.
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#28
We will probably need a constitutional amendment to completely get money out of
okaawhatever
Apr 2015
#33
I'm pretty sure lots of people in the party have already spoken out about this...
hughee99
Apr 2015
#32