Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

16. As for habitat loss

Reply to Feron (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:37 PM

Apr 2015

As an ecologist, habitat is of course a keen interest of mine. The habitat - meaning the land and available natural resources -- has been doing rather well, actually. It is the invisible radiation which has been documented to have increased since Chernobyl and especially Fukushima.

I am glad to see that you do realize that the birds around Fukushima have been affected by the radiation. That is a good first step. Now you just need to come to the realization that radiation from Fukushima has landed in the US.

You are well on your way to becoming anti-nuke!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Beware of pro-nuke people [View all] RobertEarl Apr 2015 OP

obsolete technology - too many people making $$ from it and trying to save it nt msongs Apr 2015 #1

True. We could use a magnifying glass to boil water and have it turn turbines. Octafish Apr 2015 #11

Beware the Jabberwock, my son! n/t Silent3 Apr 2015 #2

An ally of mine wrote this RobertEarl Apr 2015 #7

ENE news is in the same vein as Natural News.. Feron Apr 2015 #8

You haven't read it much? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #9

As for habitat loss RobertEarl Apr 2015 #16

You're an ecologist, and think N. American habitat is doing well? Really? NickB79 Apr 2015 #20

Thank you RobertEarl Apr 2015 #22

"Audubon.....financed by elites such as nuke power industries" NickB79 Apr 2015 #29

Nice try RobertEarl Apr 2015 #31

Okay, whatever dude. LeftyMom Apr 2015 #3

That's all you got? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #5

Is that really the same guy? NutmegYankee Apr 2015 #19

My advice? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #30

Appears to be. LeftyMom Apr 2015 #32

TEPCO Rose is just the official to tell its official story like. Octafish Apr 2015 #4

Recommended. nt Zorra Apr 2015 #6

There are plenty of valid, factual, scientific reasons to be against nukes hobbit709 Apr 2015 #10

You forgot the dolphins in the Atlantic who have been irradiated by Fukushima. zappaman Apr 2015 #12

I forgot, I busy with 4:20. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #13

To repeat RobertEarl Apr 2015 #18

It seems I can say the same to anti-nuke people NobodyHere Apr 2015 #24

Sure you can RobertEarl Apr 2015 #27

Heh RobertEarl Apr 2015 #14

Forget all about your claims of what was causing the melting starfish? hobbit709 Apr 2015 #15

No. I stand behind it, totally RobertEarl Apr 2015 #17

Because sea star wasting disease dates back to 1942, before we even invented nukes NickB79 Apr 2015 #23

Nice try RobertEarl Apr 2015 #26

Scientifically lacking is your shtick in trade. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #33

Accuse them? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #34

That genie is out of the bottle...waaaaaaaaaaaaaayyy out there somewhere by now. Rex Apr 2015 #21

How to stop it? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #25

True, that is assuming most people care to deal with pollution. Which I do not see. Rex Apr 2015 #28

1981 RobertEarl Apr 2015 #35