Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
35. 1981
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:59 PM
Apr 2015

Ronald the asshole reagan took solar panels off the White House.

Jimmy Carter, a man who was familiar with nuke power, is the man who put them there.

34 years later, the country has just recently put solar back on our White House.

Carter also was the man who put coffin nails to nuclear power and the asshole who replaced him opened up that casket and let that vampire loose.

30 years later, on DU, I proposed that nuke power radiation was killing birds. It really pissed off some DUers, and ever since they have gone from claiming nukes were safe and radiation was not dangerous to what you see here, tonight, on this thread.

It has been one hell of a trip, and now, because of Fukushima and that fact that Fukushima can't be hidden like TMI and Chernobyl was, the pro-nuke people are relegated to a few measly posts on DU.

I have been called all kinds of names by the pro-nukes, and yet here I stand, still here, still telling the truth, 35 years after that damned asshole reagan diverted the course Carter set the country on.

Hey, one does what one can do, eh?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Beware of pro-nuke people [View all] RobertEarl Apr 2015 OP
obsolete technology - too many people making $$ from it and trying to save it nt msongs Apr 2015 #1
True. We could use a magnifying glass to boil water and have it turn turbines. Octafish Apr 2015 #11
Beware the Jabberwock, my son! n/t Silent3 Apr 2015 #2
An ally of mine wrote this RobertEarl Apr 2015 #7
ENE news is in the same vein as Natural News.. Feron Apr 2015 #8
You haven't read it much? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #9
As for habitat loss RobertEarl Apr 2015 #16
You're an ecologist, and think N. American habitat is doing well? Really? NickB79 Apr 2015 #20
Thank you RobertEarl Apr 2015 #22
"Audubon.....financed by elites such as nuke power industries" NickB79 Apr 2015 #29
Nice try RobertEarl Apr 2015 #31
Okay, whatever dude. LeftyMom Apr 2015 #3
That's all you got? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #5
Is that really the same guy? NutmegYankee Apr 2015 #19
My advice? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #30
Appears to be. LeftyMom Apr 2015 #32
TEPCO Rose is just the official to tell its official story like. Octafish Apr 2015 #4
Recommended. nt Zorra Apr 2015 #6
There are plenty of valid, factual, scientific reasons to be against nukes hobbit709 Apr 2015 #10
You forgot the dolphins in the Atlantic who have been irradiated by Fukushima. zappaman Apr 2015 #12
I forgot, I busy with 4:20. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #13
To repeat RobertEarl Apr 2015 #18
It seems I can say the same to anti-nuke people NobodyHere Apr 2015 #24
Sure you can RobertEarl Apr 2015 #27
Heh RobertEarl Apr 2015 #14
Forget all about your claims of what was causing the melting starfish? hobbit709 Apr 2015 #15
No. I stand behind it, totally RobertEarl Apr 2015 #17
Because sea star wasting disease dates back to 1942, before we even invented nukes NickB79 Apr 2015 #23
Nice try RobertEarl Apr 2015 #26
Scientifically lacking is your shtick in trade. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #33
Accuse them? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #34
That genie is out of the bottle...waaaaaaaaaaaaaayyy out there somewhere by now. Rex Apr 2015 #21
How to stop it? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #25
True, that is assuming most people care to deal with pollution. Which I do not see. Rex Apr 2015 #28
1981 RobertEarl Apr 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Beware of pro-nuke people»Reply #35