Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It's a shame that people actually defend atrocities like this with statements like that. notadmblnd May 2015 #1
True. DURHAM D May 2015 #2
Thank you! FLPanhandle May 2015 #3
poor lady - and anyone who defends this action shares in the guilt samsingh May 2015 #4
k & r rollin74 May 2015 #5
Nuclear Unicorn, you are culturally insensitive. Yorktown May 2015 #6
Guilty as charged without remorse or apology and certain to be a recidivist. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #7
Yup. This ^^^^^ nt riderinthestorm May 2015 #8
kick NutmegYankee May 2015 #9
Pm kick nt riderinthestorm May 2015 #10
I doubt she was trying to be provocative for the sake of being provacative. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #11
"Don't even attempt to compare this to Pam Gellar." Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #12
Pam Gellar herself was not attacked. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #13
Pam Gellar was not attacked because the detail officer is an outstanding marksman. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #15
Another person wasinjured. And there was the potential innocent bystanders could have died as well. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #21
"No one excuses the actions of the perpetrators" except when you excuse the attackers 4 words later. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #25
"it is impossible to claim that Gellar has at least some responsibility as well" muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #44
Fixed. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #45
And you know why she gets leftynyc May 2015 #30
but in the case of gellar we don't mind. ileus May 2015 #16
It doesn't MATTER if one was 'trying to be provocative'. PeaceNikki May 2015 #14
You're completely missing the point of this entire story. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #17
"Pam Gellar did this in order to elicit a specific reaction." Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #22
Again, if you knew anything about Pam Geller, you'd know what her motives are. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #24
Who has Pam Gellar attacked with physical violence? Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #26
Who did George Bush or Dick Cheney personally attack with physical violence? Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #28
You're claiming Gellar has the power of the Commander in Chief? Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #33
I'm saying that Geller has a bully pulpit. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #37
"And she has used it to her own selfish means." Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #38
Her name could be Bernie Fuckin' Sanders and she'd be just as wrong. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #39
Someone who poses ZERO physical threat has ZERO culpability when violently attacked. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #40
Sorry, that's the old "her dress was too short" argument. EX500rider May 2015 #43
No, I think *you* are missing the whole point. PeaceNikki May 2015 #23
No shit, it shouldn't be a justification. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #27
Eye. Of. The. Beholder. Dude. PeaceNikki May 2015 #32
Two gay people holding hands do so because it is a personal expression of love. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #34
" it is possible to claim that Gellar has at least some responsibility as well" muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #49
Correction- an anti-Muslim cartoon contest is an act of aggression. Unless you think aggression KittyWampus May 2015 #51
You are clearly being purposely understood. There clearly is no comparison. HERVEPA May 2015 #36
ITA with this post. Ilsa May 2015 #42
To be fair, it's usually religious groups that insult others, for example Westboro Baptist Church Bluenorthwest May 2015 #50
I understand and agree. Ilsa May 2015 #52
+1 FLPanhandle May 2015 #18
She has the right to be provocative, for whatever reason she chooses. n/t pnwmom May 2015 #41
k and r. nt cwydro May 2015 #19
Certainly seems as though a lot more people than merely two terrorists took Gellar's bait. LanternWaste May 2015 #20
Nailed it. nt. NCTraveler May 2015 #29
I see who started this, and I know, there is no discussion closeupready May 2015 #31
IKR!? Rex May 2015 #46
YES get the red out May 2015 #35
So how is merely existing vs. campaiging against Islam the same thing? Rex May 2015 #47
To those who are acting out violently it is the same thing and the results are the same -- Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»She had to know her actio...»Reply #46