Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regardless of whether Al Gore or Ralph Nader was to blame for "losing" the 2000 election... [View all]KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)46. Why did Gore concede? - nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Regardless of whether Al Gore or Ralph Nader was to blame for "losing" the 2000 election... [View all]
YoungDemCA
May 2015
OP
Sorry. No Nader, no Bush. despite any of the other factors. I don't defend BFEE,
HERVEPA
May 2015
#2
Here's the exit poll results from a Harvard Political Science professor for a paper
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#81
It's a peer reviewed paper for the American Political Science Association
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#84
It is in fact incredibly relevant, because it answers the question. The answer is "no."
Scootaloo
May 2015
#10
because this was a brand-new sentiment that Nader introduced to American politics?
Scootaloo
May 2015
#26
But 'the parties are the same" is not a remotely new sentiment in US politics
Scootaloo
May 2015
#33
(Nader) haters gonna hate. What can you do? (Although you are exhibiting the
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#27
I've often wondered why defecting to the Republicans rarely rates a mention,
winter is coming
May 2015
#20
Presumably, the Dems who voted for Nader wanted something different, too,
winter is coming
May 2015
#41
Nader took 20,000 votes from Gore in Florida which made the results close enough for
world wide wally
May 2015
#13
Thank you. Yet some people seem unable to digest this simple fact. No Nader, no Bush
HERVEPA
May 2015
#15
That is simplistic thinking. We have no way of knowing what else bush was willing to do to steal it.
morningfog
May 2015
#55
Couldn't anyone have checked the ballots in Florida and made a fuss about the butterfly ballot?
Chathamization
May 2015
#19
And when the election came down to whom you'd prefer to have a beer with, why
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#45
Yes, Ralph Nader is an enemy of democracy and did everything he could to split the vote
The Second Stone
May 2015
#42
There were so many Republican shenanigans going on in Florida at the time,
Art_from_Ark
May 2015
#58
And if Nader hadn't also spoiled New Hampshire, Florida's electoral votes could have
The Second Stone
May 2015
#78
Yes, I remember it well, and with the dirty tricks that we see in most elections
The Second Stone
May 2015
#67
Ross Perot absolutely ran to spoil the race of GHW Bush and throw it to Clinton
The Second Stone
May 2015
#73
Those are the biggest enemies of American democracy that we have ever seen
world wide wally
May 2015
#96