Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Fri May 11, 2012, 08:22 PM May 2012

Sweeping Social Security changes for women, caregivers and same-sex couples proposed [View all]

National Coalition Urges Congress to Consider Sweeping Social Security Proposals for Women, Caregivers and Same-Sex Couples

"The truth is -- as our nation ages and retirement income continues to decline for millions of Americans" Congress should be talking about the adequacy of Social Security’s benefits not cutting them. Congress should examine the inequities that have created a poverty rate for senior women and widows that is 50% higher than other retirees 65 and older. We can break this Social Security glass ceiling…in fact, we must do so to preserve the economic security of generations of American women and their families.” Max Richtman, NCPSSM President/CEO

The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare Foundation, the National Organization for Women Foundation and the Institute for Women’s Policy Research briefed Congressional staff today on their research examining the challenges facing America ’s elderly women and their families. Their report, Breaking the Social Security Glass Ceiling also proposes initiatives to ensure Social Security benefits are adequate for all Americans, particularly for women and women of color.

“Our proposals are designed to modernize the Social Security system and recognize particularly the changes that have occurred in women's lives and in family life, so that women will be rewarded more fairly for the full value of the work they do, both in the labor market and in raising the next generation. We can strengthen the Social Security system to address the gender gap in retirement that reveals many more older women in poverty than older men, while still addressing the financial needs of the program.” Dr. Heidi Hartmann, Institute for Women's Policy Research President

“If implemented, the recommendations we make in 'Breaking the Social Security Glass Ceiling' will go a long way toward creating a retirement and disability insurance program that recognizes the new reality of working women and men and values women's role in society as both breadwinners and primary caregivers. Crediting women's years out of the paid labor force is a long overdue feature that NOW strongly supports and urges lawmakers to support as well.” Terry O’Neill, NOW Foundation President

Here are just some of the recommendations in this groundbreaking report:

---Improving Survivor Benefits. Women living alone often are forced into poverty because of benefit reductions stemming from the death of a spouse. Providing a widow or widower with 75 percent of the couple's combined benefit treats one-earner and two-earner couples more fairly and reduces the likelihood of leaving the survivor in poverty.

---Providing Social Security Credits for Caregivers. We recommend imputed earnings for up to five family service years be granted to a worker who leaves or reduces his/her participation in the work force to provide care to children under the age of six or to elderly family members.

---Equal Benefits for Same-Sex Married Couples and Partners. Gay and lesbian same-sex couples, whether married or not, are denied a host of benefits under state and federal law that are routinely provided to heterosexual married couples. Social Security benefits should not be denied to qualified retirees because of their sexual orientation.

---Restoring Student Benefits. Social Security pays benefits to children until age 18, or 19 if they are still attending high school, if a working parent has died, become disabled or retired. In the past, those benefits continued until age 22 if the child was a full-time student in college or a vocational school. Congress ended post-secondary students’ benefits in 1981 which has disproportionately hurt children of parents in blue-collar jobs, African Americans, and lower income students.

“Social Security is a vital lifeline for all Americans, especially women and people of color. When you consider that Social Security provides 90% of seniors’ income for 58% of unmarried women of color, 53% of Hispanics and 47% of African Americans it’s hard to understand why benefit cuts are always the first answer for fiscal hawks hoping to use Social Security for deficit reduction. Building on what works, ‘Breaking the Social Security Glass Ceiling’ offers a modernization plan for Social Security that would strengthen benefits for women and their families while improving the equity and adequacy for generations of Americans.” Dr. Carroll Estes, NPCSSM Foundation Board Chair

While some suggest we can’t afford to provide even current level benefits to America ’s retirees, disabled and their families, we disagree. In fact, we believe our nation can’t afford not to provide fair and adequate benefits for future generations of working Americans. A number of funding options are included in this research, including:

---Eliminate the Cap on Social Security Payroll Contributions.
---Slowly Increase the Contribution Rate by 1/40th of One Percent over 20 years.
---Treat all Salary Reduction Plans like 401K’s.


Together, these proposals provide revenue increases equal to 3.99% of taxable payroll. They would close the actuarial deficit (2.67% of payroll) while also funding the modest program improvements recommended.

The full report, “Breaking the Social Security Glass Ceiling”, is available online at: http://www.ncpssmfoundation.org/breaking_ss_glass_ceiling.pdf.

You can watch the entire briefing on CSpan at: http://www.c-span.org/Events/NCPSSM-Releases-Report-on-Women-and-Social-Security/10737430628-1/

###

The National Committee, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the Board of Directors and professional staff. The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing better-informed citizens and voters.

Media Inquiries to:
Pamela Causey 202-216-8378/202-236-2123/ Kim Wright 202-216-8414


Kim Wright
Assistant Director of Communications
The National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare
(202) 216-8414 (o)
(202) 787-2701 (fax)
http://www.ncpssm.org
http://www.entitledtoknow.org



65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sounds like good policies to implement Autumn May 2012 #1
some really good ideas. hopefully, they will at least be considered. northoftheborder May 2012 #2
Uh uh danbeee46 May 2012 #3
Which amounts to a huge motivation for me to change that n/t eridani May 2012 #4
+1,000. Giving in to the GOP by not voting is voting for misery. freshwest May 2012 #6
I agree with that but will just add that it also matters what kind of Democrats we elect. limpyhobbler May 2012 #16
If you stop spending money and save half your income, invested not even aggressively RB TexLa May 2012 #5
Hard to do when your full time job pays you below the poverty line. Scuba May 2012 #7
Many California residents pay more than 1/3 of their income on rent varelse May 2012 #10
I don't know anybody who can do that. Everybody is struggling to make it to the next paycheck. limpyhobbler May 2012 #14
That may be, cheapdate May 2012 #15
Save half your income?? Really? That is impossible for most people. nt Cass May 2012 #19
You don't understand how the majority of people live, do you? Matariki May 2012 #20
That's an opinion, alright etherealtruth May 2012 #21
Yeah, I hear a lot of especially affluent people say that Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #24
Stop spending money on what? lunatica May 2012 #27
really dear annabanana May 2012 #35
Dear???? There is no reason to use a sexist term toward me. Using a racist or sexist term toward RB TexLa May 2012 #36
Yeah... Okey dokey. FogerRox May 2012 #41
Dude, my RENT is almost half my income. Hell Hath No Fury May 2012 #43
...said Mitt Romney to the homeless man CreekDog May 2012 #61
These are excellent ideas, and they need to be shouted from the rooftops. CaliforniaPeggy May 2012 #8
Ken Wright has some might fine ideas. Auntie Bush May 2012 #9
K&R varelse May 2012 #11
Is all this retroactive? For instance the survivor benefits. n/t vaberella May 2012 #12
If people advocating that are loud and visible during the process of negotiating the details-- eridani May 2012 #17
K&R....n/t unkachuck May 2012 #13
Eliminating the cap creates the first 16k monthly benefits check FogerRox May 2012 #18
Nope. There is a cap on benefits now eridani May 2012 #22
There is no benefit cap, that max of you cite is based on payments FogerRox May 2012 #23
There most assuredly is a benefit cap eridani May 2012 #25
And you know what, I'd be willing to raise the benefit cap Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #26
There's no need. Mariana May 2012 #29
just by raising the cap from 106,800 to 110k this year FogerRox May 2012 #32
"This figure is based on earnings" from the link you provided. FogerRox May 2012 #31
The cap on earnings leads to a de facto cap on benefits eridani May 2012 #33
The cap on earnings leads to a de facto max benefit FogerRox May 2012 #38
That would certainly be a good first step n/t eridani May 2012 #49
I should say a 5k increase for those who get the max benefit, FogerRox May 2012 #56
So write the legislation to include a maximum monthly benefit. Mariana May 2012 #28
If we cap benefits, we introduce a means test, administratively making SS welfare FogerRox May 2012 #40
It's only welfare if you refuse any payouts to those at the top eridani May 2012 #46
Raising survivor benefits has to be balanced out by cutting elsewhere. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #30
Not if you Scrap the Cap n/t eridani May 2012 #34
Absolutely untrue FogerRox May 2012 #39
Nothing you said negated anything I said. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #44
Since benefits are computed by an earnings formula (AIME) FogerRox May 2012 #45
the max benefit is immaterial to this topic. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #47
You don't have to cut if you increase or scrap the cap eridani May 2012 #48
Why not give that money to retirees? lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #51
You mean raising kids and taking care of sick elders is not work? eridani May 2012 #52
It's not employment, no. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #53
That is utterly trivial compared to the actual work of raising kids eridani May 2012 #54
You're confused. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #55
$265/month is not adequate, and puts you into the disposable human garbage category eridani May 2012 #57
It is certainly not enough for the work jwirr did. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #58
Look--most women who take time out for kids are not Ann Romney eridani May 2012 #59
Women who worked have their own SS earnings history. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #60
What I mean is that caring for kids and managing households is WORK eridani May 2012 #65
it's always a zero sum game for you Jeff CreekDog May 2012 #62
Inventing money isn't a very rational way to think. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #63
inventing money is what capitalism is all about CreekDog May 2012 #64
These very good ideas will NOT be broadcast. So we must annabanana May 2012 #37
Good provision. Especially the care providers issue. I took care of my daughter for 45 years saving jwirr May 2012 #42
Excellent--all good ideas librechik May 2012 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sweeping Social Security ...