Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
34. A few things:
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 05:59 PM
Jun 2015

I notice that you're referencing only "extreme poverty," which is a technical definition subject to some dispute. If we're going to be thorough, we should also consider other measures - and you haven't commented on my observation that these statistics only reveal so much.

More importantly, I don't have access to the study I read years ago so I can't really comment on its methodology (my recollection is that it talked about caloric intake and access to medicine and the main takeaway included the short time frame during which conditions changed) and how that compares to the statistics you're quoting. So it's difficult for me to argue from it - and it would be rational of you to doubt it - but I do have reason to challenge the other poster's belief.

As a final thought, I think this subject is complex and involves too many interacting variables to draw the simple conclusion offered by the other person. Can we say whether industrial revolution happen because of capitalism? Are we making any attempt to include the downsides to all this - the rise of abject and relative poverty, accounting for external costs with impacts yet to be felt (e.g. climate change and other negative environmental impacts) - in our calculations? I find it both irresponsible and dishonest to say capitalism is the bestest and that people will never come up with a preferable alternative.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting! demmiblue Jun 2015 #1
I love this woman. LWolf Jun 2015 #2
She has been ahead of the curve for decades hifiguy Jun 2015 #3
LeGuin is an astute political writer. Thanks for bringing this in. nt Hekate Jun 2015 #4
I've been looking Fairgo Jun 2015 #5
The Dispossessed is a must-read. MH1 Jun 2015 #11
K&R! myrna minx Jun 2015 #6
I wonder how much money she has made from capitalism NobodyHere Jun 2015 #7
Better questions. PETRUS Jun 2015 #14
+1 LWolf Jun 2015 #19
That's a religious question, and the religion is capitalism. hunter Jun 2015 #18
Does it have to include heroes and dragons? I hope not. nt valerief Jun 2015 #8
Ursula Le Guin is a treasure. She has written some of the most amazing stories ever. scarletwoman Jun 2015 #9
The Left Hand of Darkness was so completely minimalist KamaAina Jun 2015 #12
Maybe not as overt a political message as "The Dispossed", however scarletwoman Jun 2015 #15
I completely missed that KamaAina Jun 2015 #20
Indeed Fritz Walter Jun 2015 #16
Tax the Rich seveneyes Jun 2015 #10
How about Augiedog Jun 2015 #13
She's had a rather large influence on my thinking about politics and the economy. hunter Jun 2015 #17
I don't think one exists LittleBlue Jun 2015 #21
Nothing in your post is true. nt PETRUS Jun 2015 #22
Everything I wrote is true. You don't know our own history LittleBlue Jun 2015 #23
You made two assertions. PETRUS Jun 2015 #24
The reduction in poverty in China happened after Mao muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #25
Both things are true. PETRUS Jun 2015 #28
How many were lifted out under Mao? muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #29
That's a fair question. PETRUS Jun 2015 #32
But the thing is that post-1981 China might be called 'capitalist' muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #33
A few things: PETRUS Jun 2015 #34
The greatest modern movement out of poverty came in the last 30 years LittleBlue Jun 2015 #26
Two things. PETRUS Jun 2015 #30
Might I suggest Democratic Socialism? We already have it with the schools, and libraries and libdem4life Jun 2015 #27
Tough sell Scootaloo Jun 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ursula K. Le Guin Calls o...»Reply #34