Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)

6. I have never heard a key public official basically denounce the ground soldiers that we are

Reply to Damansarajaya (Original post)

Fri Jun 12, 2015, 02:07 PM

Jun 2015

partnered with as cowards who won't fight. And then a week later suggest to the President that we partner up some more with these cowards who won't fight. The fact that Ass Carter is still SecDef after that astounds me, but then he's the Neocon Chickenhawk in residence (presumably the MIC lurves him) plus it may have been Obama who trotted him out to say that. Either way, the man is a disaster who shot a hole through the entire war effort, demoralized the ground forces whom we rely upon, and yet signed deployment orders to put more of our ground soldiers next to the very cowards he denounces--he obviously doesn't give a shit about them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The real reason "cowardly" Iraqi troops cave before ISIS . . . [View all] Damansarajaya Jun 2015 OP

Three other reasons... Scootaloo Jun 2015 #1

So why hasn't ISIL taken Tehran? Damansarajaya Jun 2015 #3

Iranians would defend their country from non-Iranian invaders. dawg Jun 2015 #7

Exactly my point in the OP! Damansarajaya Jun 2015 #9

I'll add: they'll get executed, probably painfully, if captured muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #8

Gotta bust up that place. dawg Jun 2015 #2

Is that the role of the US? To determine the borders of soverign Damansarajaya Jun 2015 #4

They are choosing to do that by popular decree right now. dawg Jun 2015 #5

Sounds about right . . . nt Damansarajaya Jun 2015 #11

I have never heard a key public official basically denounce the ground soldiers that we are TwilightGardener Jun 2015 #6

Excellent analysis. nt Damansarajaya Jun 2015 #10

When this latest mess started it was suggested that the country be broken up into three sections. jwirr Jun 2015 #12

Imagine how destabilizing that would be, if they were given the time and space to be successful at TwilightGardener Jun 2015 #13

You may be right but then we are in an eternal war. And I have some doubt that the ME can get jwirr Jun 2015 #14

Watch the kingdoms start going up in flames. Or a multi-sided nuclear arms race. TwilightGardener Jun 2015 #15

I agree on the nuclear issue. At this time there are very few countries that are not already up in jwirr Jun 2015 #16