Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders Voted for the Most Reprehensible Pro-Gun Legislation in Recent Memory [View all]William769
(59,147 posts)355. Well I guess you just gave everybody your answer.
Good to know about your postings.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
371 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders Voted for the Most Reprehensible Pro-Gun Legislation in Recent Memory [View all]
sheshe2
Jun 2015
OP
I really hate hearing this. I know a Senator must cater to their constituents but.......
leftofcool
Jun 2015
#1
Hillary was hoodwinked by Dubya's cunning wiles, faced with a smooth talker like that who wouldn't?
Fumesucker
Jun 2015
#10
Either she's modern history's biggest dupe -- right up there with George Romney in the
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#238
lol! Nah, she was DLC. They pushed for war. Lots of quick, easy money for war profiteers, banksters,
Zorra
Jun 2015
#261
I wonder which vote resulted in the largest body count. Bernie's gun vote or:
NewSystemNeeded
Jun 2015
#3
That should headline every Sanders spot heading into Iowa and New Hampshire. If the
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#241
"The Bernie supporters tell me he attended a rally 50 years ago for MLK."
WorseBeforeBetter
Jun 2015
#150
Oh, I heard the equivalent on here not long ago after I posted about Sanders having marched
cui bono
Jun 2015
#204
Well, it's certainly not going to custom-tailored suits and $600 haircuts!
WorseBeforeBetter
Jun 2015
#172
"They get paid per post?" That's what you say when you have nothing to offer but ignorance.
Cha
Jun 2015
#226
Just look through the HC group. You'll find an OP about jury block lists for sure.
cui bono
Jun 2015
#275
There's a thread in there now calling Sanders supporters a "mob" and "dangerous and unbalanced".
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#346
I'm just glad I don't see that sort of thing in the Bernie Sanders group.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#352
Nope. The honourable thing to do is not post shitty threads like that to begin with.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#354
Like I said, I'm just glad I don't have to read stuff like that in the Sanders group.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#362
Maybe because classy people realize when they're being offensive and self delete?
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#365
Also because the host said that they didn't want threads like that in the group.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#367
I had just read her posts in the other thread when I noticed this dupe.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#103
"Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue." - La Rochefoucauld - nt
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#245
sheshe you shouldn't even ever talk about Bernie ever after that vile OP of yours.
cui bono
Jun 2015
#184
She actually said the children of Sandy Hook died because of Bernie:
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#185
"If you should decide you care what some people of color think about these discussions"
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#341
Bernie's supporters are "dangerous and unbalanced" according to one thread.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#347
If the only reason you know that Bernie has been fighting for PoC for DECADES
cui bono
Jun 2015
#206
To their credit other Hillary supporters were all over her for that.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#104
That was the one I meant, associating him with racist cops and slavery.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#193
I was alerted on for referring to it as "associating him with racism".
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#237
That is some serious fucking slime and reflects so well on the person who
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#242
Like Ford, gun manufacturers are held liable for defective products.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#33
This was all explained in the first thread, they're being deliberately obtuse.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#58
It works a treat on those unfamiliar with consumer law and/or guns...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#76
You've ruined a perfectly good appeal to emotion with some inconvenient truth
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#55
The Pinto was a defective model. They are not held responsible for all deaths caused
cui bono
Jun 2015
#189
And in relation to other cars made at the same time the Pinto fell in the upper third.
GoneOffShore
Jun 2015
#264
Because GUNS, that's why. Inquire further and you'll be insulted again:
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#42
No because a car's sole purpose isn't to harm or kill, while that is the only purpose of a gun.
Fla Dem
Jun 2015
#271
Then Hillary should answer to the families of our military men and women who died in Iraq
Autumn
Jun 2015
#81
Voting on the side of the gun manufacturers and dealers is not voting for his constituents, it would
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#9
Why are you making shit up? The PLCAA exempts lawsuits for defective products.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#17
Nice desperation OP. Over 50% of DU members own a gun according to the last DU poll on the subject.
L0oniX
Jun 2015
#16
He was correct to support the PLCAA: manufacturers (of any product) should not he held
petronius
Jun 2015
#19
Agree 100% and Howerd Dean understood this perfectly. With a name like Quixote you would think I
Quixote1818
Jun 2015
#221
Tough to win in Vermont if you vote for the Brady Bill. Sometimes pragmatism is needed (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jun 2015
#57
You claimed that Bernie's vote was responsible for the dead children of Sandy Hook,
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#155
Nope, lied again. You actually said: "Sandy Hook Children died because of his vote."
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#183
Maybe I'm remembering it wrong, but the guy who killed those children didn't buy a gun.
ladyVet
Jun 2015
#315
You are correct, he murdered his mother, stole 3 of her legally purchased firearms
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#364
Gun manufacturers have a responsibility to make sure their products stay out of criminal hands.
NuclearDem
Jun 2015
#69
Firearms manufacturers are by federal law, forbidden to sell directly to the public,
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#74
It's the ATF's job to supervise the dealers, not the manufacturers'
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#91
Had nothing to do with us, it was a self induced kneecapping through the program,
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#106
Dead is dead. Should cutlery and cookware manufacturers be held as responsible?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#127
Posession of cookware and sporting goods isn't Constitutionally protected
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#158
Speech invoking imminent lawless action isn't protected by the Constitution.
NuclearDem
Jun 2015
#167
Um, no- it's you trying to plant the "let violent criminals have guns" flag on *me*
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#170
Uh, speech inciting imminent lawless action is illegal before the person even opens their mouth.
NuclearDem
Jun 2015
#174
We don't try to restrain what people say beforehand, or tape their mouths shut.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#177
"All of these are perfectly acceptable compromises between the Bill of Rights ..."
beevul
Jun 2015
#291
If "destructive" is your new criteria, you're gonna have to add a lot more activities.
jeff47
Jun 2015
#265
I take it all these Remington 700 lawsuits didn't happen in your world?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#75
It's not so much that some post deceitful hit pieces like this, it's that the same posters
Marr
Jun 2015
#70
Same crew posting the same shit. Then complain when it gets handed back to them.
Katashi_itto
Jun 2015
#73
Sen Sanders is not just running in the Dem Primary on DU, either. These are facts that the OP is
Cha
Jun 2015
#225
Interesting how many poster who posted in this thread have no problem dishing out criticism of
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#164
"legit criticism"? The op called Sanders a "gun nut" and lied about the PLCAA legislation.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#169
You're complaining about hit pieces on Hillary in one you posted about Sanders?
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#195
Hit pieces like, "Why did none of these deeply held core beliefs show up in 2008"
jeff47
Jun 2015
#210
"This law doesn’t protect gun owners; it protects gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and
Ghost in the Machine
Jun 2015
#190
Only posters who are Loco keep count so there's the answer to your 'who's counting eh?
Autumn
Jun 2015
#259
Tsk, she! Isn't GD suppose to be all positive Sen Sanders and negative Hillary all the time!?
Cha
Jun 2015
#227
This is the 5th time this 5 week old "Gun Nut" hit piece has been posted on DU.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#229
Remember when Obama called her 'Annie Oakley' for pandering to gun owners?
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#293
If your goal is to make yourself look ridiculous, I agree, this thread worked out well for you
Scootaloo
Jun 2015
#314
+1, none of these candidates can throw a stone no matter how much we'd like them....
uponit7771
Jun 2015
#335
Helped me establish the fact that NONE of the dem candidates can throw stones...
uponit7771
Jun 2015
#333