Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is why millennials will never grow up [View all]PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)84. Your parents would be considered part of the 'Silent Generation'.
Mine are too.
Why Is it Called the Silent Generation?
The Silent Generation refers to people who were born between 1925 and 1945. There are several theories as to where the label 'Silent Generation' originated. The children who grew up during this time worked very hard and kept quiet. It was commonly understood that children should be seen and not heard.
During this time, the House Committee on Un-American Activities launched an assault on political freedom in America. This, in conjunction with Senator Joseph McCarthy's overzealous attempts to feed anti-communist sentiment in America, made it dangerous for people to speak freely about their opinions and beliefs. They became cautious about where they went and whom they were seen with. Therefore, the people were effectively 'silenced.'
In 1951, a Time magazine article was written in which the children of the generation were described as unimaginative, withdrawn, unadventurous, and cautious. Time magazine used the name 'Silent Generation' to refer to these individuals. The name has been there ever since.
http://study.com/academy/lesson/the-silent-generation-definition-characteristics-facts.html
The Silent Generation refers to people who were born between 1925 and 1945. There are several theories as to where the label 'Silent Generation' originated. The children who grew up during this time worked very hard and kept quiet. It was commonly understood that children should be seen and not heard.
During this time, the House Committee on Un-American Activities launched an assault on political freedom in America. This, in conjunction with Senator Joseph McCarthy's overzealous attempts to feed anti-communist sentiment in America, made it dangerous for people to speak freely about their opinions and beliefs. They became cautious about where they went and whom they were seen with. Therefore, the people were effectively 'silenced.'
In 1951, a Time magazine article was written in which the children of the generation were described as unimaginative, withdrawn, unadventurous, and cautious. Time magazine used the name 'Silent Generation' to refer to these individuals. The name has been there ever since.
http://study.com/academy/lesson/the-silent-generation-definition-characteristics-facts.html
If I had more time, I'd search for a better article. This one is a bit too simplistic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Says the guy quoting statistics showing Reagan losing by 1, tied or winning by 17.
jeff47
Aug 2015
#44
Sure, but without a major shift in boomer voting from 72 -80 reagan doesn't get elected.
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#66
No. The high cost of college is the result of easy credit and careerist administrators.
AngryAmish
Aug 2015
#81
I disagree. Those things didn't help, but the big driver is the loss of inexpensive state schools
n2doc
Aug 2015
#82
I was being generous 'cause when I just outright declare us a generation of assholes
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#9
Why forgive only a debt that affects mainly middle class people, while ignoring debt
gollygee
Aug 2015
#83
Our fearless leaders grab onto any statement they can as most are riding along by the seat of their
RKP5637
Aug 2015
#53
Student loans are not the problem, atrocious tuition fees and costs are the real problem
seveneyes
Aug 2015
#12
easy access to student loans is what enabled tuition and fees to spiral out of sight
magical thyme
Aug 2015
#21
Right, because banks and financial institutions NEVER lay people off . . .. .
HughBeaumont
Aug 2015
#50
they didn't equate home ownership with growing up. It's one of many milestones...
magical thyme
Aug 2015
#22
well I never married and don't have kids either. I bought a condo at 32; replaced it with
magical thyme
Aug 2015
#39
If the residential construction industry is raising hell about this, I sure don't ever hear about it
steve2470
Aug 2015
#33
Interesting. I saw a lot of information about it back when I was looking into it
ecstatic
Aug 2015
#75
The article refers "millenials" as if the only ones which count go to college
jberryhill
Aug 2015
#57