Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 10:07 AM Aug 2015

“Independent” GMO Researcher Forced to Release Emails Showing $25K Grant from Monsanto [View all]

(ANTIMEDIA) Oakland, CA – In January of 2015, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Oakland organization U.S. Right to Know requested email records between academics, scientists, and representatives of Big Agriculture.


The FOIA requests were sent to 14 scientists at four public universities, requesting information on communications and email records.
The FOIA findings included communications of well-known, staunch proponents of GM crops like Kevin Folta, a professor and chairman of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Gainesville, who received a $25,000 grant from Monsanto. The emails reveal the funds could “be used at [his] discretion in support of [his] research and outreach projects”.

About 4,600 pages of emails, among other records, were obtained from Folta.

According to the communications, the ties between allegedly objective scientists and Big Agriculture run deep. According to Nature Magazine,
“The documents show that Monsanto paid for Folta’s travel to speak to US students, farmers, politicians and the media. Other industry contacts occasionally sent him suggested responses to common questions about GM organisms.”


While it’s not uncommon for scientists to receive corporate funding through grants, these revelations are troublesome because Folta is regularly sold to the public as an “independent” authority on GMOs. In fact, the biotech industry-funded site, GMOanswers.com — which seeks to dispel myths about the dangers of GM foods and pesticides — has still not disclosed Folta’s financial ties to Monsanto.


According to an article from Nature Magazine, U.S. Right to Know is “probing what it sees as collusion between the agricultural biotechnology industry and academics who study science, economics and communication.”
In layman’s terms, t


he organization is made up of ordinary people who seek to make corruption transparent and obliterate illusions of objectivity.
Executive director of U.S. Right to Know, Gary Ruskin, said one of the reasons the organization made the requests is that “The agri-chemical industry has spent $100 million dollars in a massive public relations campaign.The public has the right to know the dynamics.”
It looks like the FOIA targets are doing everything they can to avoid revealing information. According to Wired, “Legal teams at the universities—Nebraska, University of Florida, UC Davis, and the University of Illinois—are currently evaluating the situation, but some scientists have already spoken out against the FOIA request.”



FOIA requests might be one of the greatest threats to corruption and revolving door politics, which explains why those who oppose transparency are doing everything they can to prevent them.



“Open records requests are increasingly being used to harass and intimidate scientists and other academic researchers, or to disrupt and delay their work,” a report from The Union of Concerned Scientists claims.
“Academic institutions and other involved parties need to be prepared to respond to these requests in a way that protects the privacy and academic freedom of researchers while complying with the law and respecting the public’s right to information.”



Kevin Folta did what he could to avoid blame, saying, “I’m just a teacher, trying to distill a controversial literature for the general public.”
“I turned over everything [requested by the FOIAs] immediately,” he said.
There is no such thing as objective science when a researcher receives tens of thousands of dollars from the GM producers themselves, then goes on to promote their financiers’ products. Corporate collusion between government bureaucracies and educational institutions has become a serious issue in the U.S. that has corrupted objectivity in nearly every sector of American life.


If there is corruption in our society that you wish to make transparent, you can file your own Freedom of Information Act request, just like U.S. Right to Know did.


This article (“Independent” GMO Researcher Forced to Release Emails Showing $25K Grant from Monsanto) is free and open source.


http://theantimedia.org/independent-gmo-researcher-forced-to-release-emails-showing-25k-grant-from-monsanto/






Quote from article:


“The documents show that Monsanto paid for Folta’s travel to speak to US students, farmers, politicians and the media. Other industry contacts occasionally sent him suggested responses to common questions about GM organisms.”

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I want to know if it's GMO - Labeling should be mandatory. tecelote Aug 2015 #1
In California, Monsanto and others succeeding in obfuscating and confusing voters about labeling 4lbs Aug 2015 #13
What's amazing (and depressing) is that Prop. 37 started out with overwhelming approval RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #14
It is frightening that people are so easily manipulated by anti-GMO fearmongering. HuckleB Sep 2015 #23
Yet, if we relaxed the laws enough to allow them to add "organic" to a product... tecelote Aug 2015 #17
Kevin Folta's appearance on Joe Rogan podcast from June 4, 2015. Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #2
Joe Rogan - isn't that the Fear Factor host, in which bug-eating and bungee-jumping closeupready Aug 2015 #8
You must watch TV a lot which is so yesterday Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #9
I do need to get out more, lol. closeupready Aug 2015 #10
So you watched it on youtube?......... nope.........He's not right wing or republican Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #11
I watched it first-run. I'm old. closeupready Aug 2015 #12
Joe Rogan Experience #686 - Jeff Ross and Joe talk about Bernie Sanders Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #20
Sounds like the Tabaco industry back in azmom Aug 2015 #3
FUNNY you should say that ('cuz guess where the Tobacco Institute types went after the Master MisterP Aug 2015 #16
Big Pharma can afford to buy all the ''science'' it needs to make its point. Octafish Aug 2015 #4
Scientists don't have conflicts of interest. Science itself tells us they are above all that! Romulox Aug 2015 #5
This is a job for the *think tanks!* immoderate Aug 2015 #6
Union of Concern Scientists says Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #7
there is another way KT2000 Aug 2015 #15
Kick and R BeanMusical Aug 2015 #18
To be fair alcibiades_mystery Aug 2015 #19
To be fair that's what I live on for two years Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #21
Well heck you can't expect Monsanto to buy independent scientists. bemildred Aug 2015 #22
Your source is unethical to the core. HuckleB Sep 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“Independent” GMO Researc...