Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

4lbs

(7,395 posts)
13. In California, Monsanto and others succeeding in obfuscating and confusing voters about labeling
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 10:40 AM
Aug 2015

GMOs so that a ballot measure that would have required labeling of GMOs was defeated. They made people fear that such labeling would actually cause the price of food to go up.

They always try to hit voters with such false statements. The only cost would have been a total of $1 million statewide to regulate such labeling.

http://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_37,_Mandatory_Labeling_of_Genetically_Engineered_Food_(2012)

The ballot measure was defeated by a very narrow vote of 51.5 to 48.5

If Proposition 37 had been approved, it would have:

Required labeling on raw or processed food offered for sale to consumers if the food is made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways.

Prohibited labeling or advertising such food as "natural."

Exempted from this requirement foods that are "certified organic; unintentionally produced with genetically engineered material; made from animals fed or injected with genetically engineered material but not genetically engineered themselves; processed with or containing only small amounts of genetically engineered ingredients; administered for treatment of medical conditions; sold for immediate consumption such as in a restaurant; or alcoholic beverages."


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I want to know if it's GMO - Labeling should be mandatory. tecelote Aug 2015 #1
In California, Monsanto and others succeeding in obfuscating and confusing voters about labeling 4lbs Aug 2015 #13
What's amazing (and depressing) is that Prop. 37 started out with overwhelming approval RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #14
It is frightening that people are so easily manipulated by anti-GMO fearmongering. HuckleB Sep 2015 #23
Yet, if we relaxed the laws enough to allow them to add "organic" to a product... tecelote Aug 2015 #17
Kevin Folta's appearance on Joe Rogan podcast from June 4, 2015. Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #2
Joe Rogan - isn't that the Fear Factor host, in which bug-eating and bungee-jumping closeupready Aug 2015 #8
You must watch TV a lot which is so yesterday Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #9
I do need to get out more, lol. closeupready Aug 2015 #10
So you watched it on youtube?......... nope.........He's not right wing or republican Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #11
I watched it first-run. I'm old. closeupready Aug 2015 #12
Joe Rogan Experience #686 - Jeff Ross and Joe talk about Bernie Sanders Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #20
Sounds like the Tabaco industry back in azmom Aug 2015 #3
FUNNY you should say that ('cuz guess where the Tobacco Institute types went after the Master MisterP Aug 2015 #16
Big Pharma can afford to buy all the ''science'' it needs to make its point. Octafish Aug 2015 #4
Scientists don't have conflicts of interest. Science itself tells us they are above all that! Romulox Aug 2015 #5
This is a job for the *think tanks!* immoderate Aug 2015 #6
Union of Concern Scientists says Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #7
there is another way KT2000 Aug 2015 #15
Kick and R BeanMusical Aug 2015 #18
To be fair alcibiades_mystery Aug 2015 #19
To be fair that's what I live on for two years Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #21
Well heck you can't expect Monsanto to buy independent scientists. bemildred Aug 2015 #22
Your source is unethical to the core. HuckleB Sep 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“Independent” GMO Researc...»Reply #13