General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Context and the Assange case. [View all]AikidoSoul
(2,150 posts)that the women were violated even though they say it was consensual.
Even the "penetration" while the woman was asleep was consensual because she awoke, as you well know, and they
continued.
You behave as though you don't think that would be a normal sexual activity, and that is really sad.
Many sensual beings get sensualized in the middle of the night and are grateful for the person next to them... who
if not too sleepy will play.
You seem a bit starchy.
And you keep REFUSING to see that there is more to this story than the women.
What do you think about Karl Rove's involvement.
Let's change the discussion a bit.
What about one of the women being involved with a Cuban women's group funded by our government?
What about her CIA connections?
Are you unable to open up the lens of you mind, or do you just see "women, rape, misogyny, hate, penetration, asleep." etc., etc.