Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Ban on Banning Words [View all]
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
20. Do you feel the same way about conservative professors?
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:47 PM
Sep 2015

Are they also free to determine what constitutes "repressive terminology" in their classes and penalize students who don't adopt their preferred political and social language?

I would also note that given the extensive requirements in many colleges, students are indeed forced to take some classes. If the professor is teaching a required course, would this change your reasoning?

Ban on Banning Words [View all] n2doc Sep 2015 OP
Referring to women/men as females or males? Really? Chemisse Sep 2015 #1
There are gender neutral pronouns. Glassunion Sep 2015 #41
But why? Throd Sep 2015 #42
Mandating the use of such pronouns is no different legally than the bans branford Sep 2015 #43
Wouldn't thoughtful discussion include the use of gender neutral pronouns? Glassunion Sep 2015 #46
Like the gender neutral pronoun "It?" nt alphafemale Sep 2015 #57
No. Glassunion Sep 2015 #59
Nope. This is just silliness. nt alphafemale Sep 2015 #61
Except "they" is not always grammatically correct. Quantess Sep 2015 #99
As I indicated in my post, I certainly would happily use non-gender specific pronouns. branford Sep 2015 #63
Agreed. I hate the very idea of "banning" words. Glassunion Sep 2015 #66
I think the problem you run into there Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #83
Then that would be the problem of the "some people", and not the comedian. Glassunion Sep 2015 #87
Sometimes it is necessary to identify if someone is male or female. Chemisse Sep 2015 #76
Ah, but that discriminates against people who identify as intersexuals Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #85
That sounds easy enough Chemisse Sep 2015 #92
I would love for there to be gender neutral pronouns. Chemisse Sep 2015 #75
Male and female are not pronouns. Chemisse Sep 2015 #74
Because those are adjectives, not nouns REP Sep 2015 #47
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, kiva Sep 2015 #51
Unfortunately I don't have an OED on me REP Sep 2015 #55
"Jackie is a female." Noun. Jackie has female genitalia." Adjective. merrily Sep 2015 #78
You would have to hear it in regular use coming from those who use it regularly to understand. dogknob Sep 2015 #54
That may very well be true, but do you really believe that the only solution branford Sep 2015 #65
I honestly am not picking but Quackers Sep 2015 #72
No. gollygee Sep 2015 #86
The use of language to demean is a problem with an attitude, not a word. Chemisse Sep 2015 #93
Good! romanic Sep 2015 #2
Good. Censorship should never be an official policy, especially at a university Warpy Sep 2015 #3
Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #4
I'm for it. hifiguy Sep 2015 #10
You want to shut tumblr down entirely? Warren DeMontague Sep 2015 #49
This idea that no one must offend anyone, anywhere, at anytime Seeking Serenity Sep 2015 #5
+ a googolplex hifiguy Sep 2015 #8
You created multiple white males? GummyBearz Sep 2015 #21
That we did (my husband played a key role in it all) Seeking Serenity Sep 2015 #27
I hate to go there but GummyBearz Sep 2015 #30
Well, Hitler loved dogs too. Seeking Serenity Sep 2015 #58
=] GummyBearz Sep 2015 #62
I couldn't help but think ... lpbk2713 Sep 2015 #6
Or Washington dixiegrrrrl Sep 2015 #88
Long, Long, LONG overdue. hifiguy Sep 2015 #7
"The Man" and "referring to women/men as females or males"? arcane1 Sep 2015 #9
I was thinking the same thing Matariki Sep 2015 #12
This gives me a sad PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #11
How would we "put a stop" to real hate? Marengo Sep 2015 #13
Hate is socialized PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #14
It is socialized by parents and peers long before anyone gets to college. hifiguy Sep 2015 #15
True, but you must start somewhere PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #16
The banned words in that syllabus covered a FAR broader reach hifiguy Sep 2015 #17
I disagree PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #18
Do you feel the same way about conservative professors? branford Sep 2015 #20
It is all so ridiculously subjective hifiguy Sep 2015 #24
The conservatives are currently doing this exact thing PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #25
That really didn't answer my questions. branford Sep 2015 #28
We must, then, agree to disagree. hifiguy Sep 2015 #22
And who defines "repressive terminology?" TexasMommaWithAHat Sep 2015 #96
No, not "professor's class, professor's rules," particularly at a state institution. branford Sep 2015 #19
I do not agree PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #23
The goals of a college class are not to indoctrinate students or demand social compliance. branford Sep 2015 #34
I agree PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #36
I'm confident that if the professors are smart, dedicated, caring branford Sep 2015 #45
Is "I see your point" offensive to people who are blind? TexasMommaWithAHat Sep 2015 #95
There are some who would take it to lengths hifiguy Sep 2015 #97
+1 TexasMommaWithAHat Sep 2015 #98
As the husband of a professor.... Adrahil Sep 2015 #26
We are not really in disagreement. branford Sep 2015 #39
Disruptive and rude is one thing. Seeking Serenity Sep 2015 #56
I'm not genrally a fan of blanket bans.... Adrahil Sep 2015 #60
The administration acted to prevent the inevitable lawsuits once the syllabi became public. branford Sep 2015 #67
The First is not unlimited in a University... Adrahil Sep 2015 #69
Virtually all "civility policies" at public institutions cannot survive judicial scrutiny. branford Sep 2015 #70
I think that's completely ridiculous... Adrahil Sep 2015 #71
Again, in most instances, a professor can set rules to prevent legitimate disruption branford Sep 2015 #73
classroom discipline? this isn't grade school. cali Sep 2015 #79
No. romanic Sep 2015 #29
"The real world doesn't work like that" PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #31
I was referring to identity politics romanic Sep 2015 #33
And people are not obligated to deal with microagressors either PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #35
It doesn't matter either way. romanic Sep 2015 #37
/\ SO MUCH THIS /\ nt hifiguy Sep 2015 #32
Just how far are you willing to go to ensure that nobody "has a sad"? Throd Sep 2015 #38
I thought that was what the professor was doing? PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #40
Banning actual hate speech is one thing. Lizzie Poppet Sep 2015 #53
The difficulty in drawing the line at what constitutes "hate speech" branford Sep 2015 #68
I think that banning words is not the way to do that. LWolf Sep 2015 #100
So proud of our Cougar rivals LittleBlue Sep 2015 #44
The Man cant keep me from saying "The Man" Warren DeMontague Sep 2015 #48
I support this. bigwillq Sep 2015 #50
I know some academics who are pretty despondent Sen. Walter Sobchak Sep 2015 #52
I am existentially amazed that hifiguy Sep 2015 #64
Check Post #4 philosslayer Sep 2015 #90
That poster is not one of the ones I was thinking about. hifiguy Sep 2015 #91
Often, "offend" is used when "hurt" is what is meant. merrily Sep 2015 #77
I knew I'd finally find something we disagree on JackInGreen Sep 2015 #80
Well, you were bound to be wrong sometime! merrily Sep 2015 #81
Priceless! JackInGreen Sep 2015 #82
You've mentioned the leash. I think I'm getting the picture. merrily Sep 2015 #84
It is your choice to refrain from offending fat people with fat jokes. Chemisse Sep 2015 #94
Professors profess, not indoctrinate. Kurska Sep 2015 #89
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ban on Banning Words»Reply #20