Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
28. Because the govt doesn't want to study those who are regular users
Mon Dec 26, 2011, 03:37 AM
Dec 2011

that are in this program. It wasn't just Irv who showed no problems. All of the people Russo examined who were still in the program (for at least 4 different illnesses) showed no harm.

In one case, the person with glaucoma had improved while using mmj. Untreated, such people will go blind.

The problem, as I noted, is that the federal govt does not want to know that marijuana is no more dangerous than coffee. They don't.

However, there are mmj in CA who have used cannabis for more than a decade. I would welcome research into the effects on those patients.

There would be more people in the federal program but the U.S. stopped it during the Bush Sr. years.

You may also refer the study I noted with 167 users over more than a year who showed no tolerance and there are also studies on long-term users that show no long-term harm in other cases.

You can also read up on Portugal's experience with drug decriminalization over a ten-year period.

Here are some more studies on long-term effects that find no permanent harmful effects - even from long-term usage.

Biegon A, Kerman IA. Autoradiographic study of pre- and postnatal distribution of cannabinoid receptors in human brain. Neuroimage 2001;14(6):1463-8.

Fried P, Watkinson B, James D, Gray R. Current and former marijuana use: preliminary findings of a longitudinal study of effects on IQ in young adults. CMAJ 2002;166(7):887-91.

Gunderson EW, Vosburg SK, Hart CL. Does marijuana use cause long-term cognitive deficits? JAMA 2002;287(20):2652.

House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Cannabis. The scientific and medical evidence. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Therapeutic Uses of Cannabis. 2nd Report, Session 2000-2001, London 2001.

Inserm. Cannabis - quels effects sur le comportement et la santé ? Paris: Les éditions Inserm, 2001.

Jacobson SW, Chiodo LM, Sokol RJ, Jacobson JL. Validity of maternal report of prenatal alcohol, cocaine, and smoking in relation to neurobehavioral outcome. Pediatrics 2002;109(5):815-25.

Joy JE, Watson SJ, Benson JA, eds. Marijuana and medicine: Assessing the science base. Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

Lyketsos CG, Garrett E, Liang KY, Anthony JC. Cannabis use and cognitive decline in persons under 65 years of age. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149(9) 94-800.

Miller P, Plant M. Heavy cannabis use among UK teenagers: an exploration. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;65(3):235-42.

Morris MC, Evans DA, Hebert LE, Bienias JL. Methodological issues in the study of cognitive decline. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149(9) 89-93.

Nyquist JR. Does marijuana use cause long-term cognitive deficits? JAMA 2002;287(20):2652.

Pope HG Jr, Gruber AJ, Hudson JI, Huestis MA, Yurgelun-Todd D. Neuropsychological performance in long-term cannabis users. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58(10) 09-15.

Pope HG Jr. Cannabis, cognition, and residual confounding. JAMA 2002;287(9):1172-4.

Richardson GA, Ryan C, Willford J, Day NL, Goldschmidt L. Prenatal alcohol and marijuana exposure. Effects on neuropsychological outcomes at 10 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2002;24(3):309-20.

Russo E, Mathre ML, Byrne A, Velin R, Bach PJ, Sanchez-Ramos J, Kirlin KA. Chronic Cannabis Use in the Compassionate Investigational New Drug Program: An Examination of Benefits and Adverse Effects of Legal Clinical Cannabis. J Cannabis Ther 2002;2(1):3-58.

Solowij N, Stephens R, Roffman RA, Babor T. Does marijuana use cause long-term cognitive deficits? JAMA 2002;287(20):2653-4.

Watson M. Does marijuana use cause long-term cognitive deficits? JAMA 2002;287(20):2652.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I saw that too and my reaction was exactly the same. Xicano Dec 2011 #1
Only a doctor can tell you how to live. cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #2
From my first taste fifty years ago, WHEN CRABS ROAR Dec 2011 #3
Woodward and Bernstein suggest that we follow the money Kennah Dec 2011 #4
Interesting that all of his staff use and he and his brother use and MindMover Dec 2011 #5
I have smoked pot on an almost daily basis for over 35 years. roody Dec 2011 #6
It is a myth. nt Mojorabbit Dec 2011 #7
Your experience is definitely your own as is everyone who uses substances of any kind..... MindMover Dec 2011 #10
Gosh That's an interesting site you have there. hootinholler Dec 2011 #14
About that NIH funding... boppers Dec 2011 #19
thank you for the link....... MindMover Dec 2011 #32
I think the main problem MMJ discussions have are factual distortions. boppers Dec 2011 #35
Maybe because the goals of NIH are not what people think they are.....or MindMover Dec 2011 #39
I know that you read every link and substantive study on marijuana on the link I provided.....in 1hr MindMover Dec 2011 #21
let's look at the stats for those who go into treatment for cannabis RainDog Dec 2011 #24
I totally agree with your summation about treatment for marijuana and avoidance of jail time...... MindMover Dec 2011 #26
your link notes cannabis is no more addictive than caffeine RainDog Dec 2011 #20
oh yea boatloads of money, the average hourly wage is around 11 bucks....for drug counseling.... MindMover Dec 2011 #23
I'm not talking about you RainDog Dec 2011 #27
Yes, certain people are making a shitload of money off of prohibition.... MindMover Dec 2011 #29
I suppose I don't quite understand this statement, then RainDog Dec 2011 #33
I have already explained myself in other replies..... MindMover Dec 2011 #37
Indeed!! CanSocDem Dec 2011 #42
There is no habituation effect to THC. GliderGuider Dec 2011 #8
The stuff you smoked in Nam had a THC content of 7-8%...... MindMover Dec 2011 #11
Users quickly learn to titrate for the desired dose. GliderGuider Dec 2011 #12
I am not arguing your point of recreational substance use for various individual reasons..... MindMover Dec 2011 #13
OK, we have no major disagreements GliderGuider Dec 2011 #15
My experience has been that I have seen many clients/patients that have some minor MindMover Dec 2011 #41
it is totally disingenuous to compare cannabis to huffing gasoline RainDog Dec 2011 #18
Comparing substances is what I do to learn about them so that I can be more MindMover Dec 2011 #25
Because the govt doesn't want to study those who are regular users RainDog Dec 2011 #28
Thank you for these links, I have some good reading to do over these holidays..... MindMover Dec 2011 #31
there were 2700 separate studies published in 2009 RainDog Dec 2011 #34
I agree with everything you wrote with this exception..... MindMover Dec 2011 #36
something that is processed would qualify as a drug, imo RainDog Dec 2011 #40
a study of patients with MS found no increase in dosage - i.e. no tolerance RainDog Dec 2011 #16
When you can't get high anymore, it's time to take a break. DCKit Dec 2011 #30
I didn't watch this series but, it is fredamae Dec 2011 #9
didn't see this RainDog Dec 2011 #17
Total legalization of it would destroy his business model. boppers Dec 2011 #22
Money trumps doing the right thing - yet again - as always under capitalism slay Dec 2011 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The "F*CK YOU" ...»Reply #28