Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
34. there were 2700 separate studies published in 2009
Mon Dec 26, 2011, 03:16 AM
Dec 2011

and something like 20k published studies noted in PubMed.

In the 1990s, the World Health Organization asked a team of experts to study the medical/health and social consequences of cannabis in relation to alcohol, nicotine, and opiates. These experts found “Overall, most of these risks (associated with marijuana) are small to moderate in size. In aggregate they are unlikely to produce public health problems comparable in scale to those currently produced by alcohol and tobacco. On existing patterns of use, cannabis poses a much less serious public health problem than is currently posed by alcohol and tobacco in Western societies.”

An interesting book about the comparison between legal alcohol and illegal cannabis is Marijuana Is Safer.

In terms of harm reduction, cannabis seems far more benign than legal substances - you note it is a soft drug but I think it's a plant. Marinol is a drug.

iow, I don't think cannabis is a drug at all. I think it should be removed entirely from the drug schedule. I realize that's not going to happen any time soon and I support an incremental approach as more feasible - to move cannabis to schedule II rather than I.

That rescheduling would be to bring the schedules in line with current medical knowledge and to acknowledge that cannabis, at the least, is no more dangerous than heroin or cocaine.

I don't know if coca leaves are designated as a drug or not. Poppies are definitely legal in the U.S., and not designated as a drug and not scheduled, even tho they are processed to make heroin. they are "illegal" in the U.S. if you grow them with the intent to turn them into a drug - which is craziness - how is law enforcement supposed to read people's minds?

This quote always amazes me - amazes me because it illustrates that the law has nothing to do with reality. That makes it bad law.

“In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume. For example, eating 10 raw potatoes can result in a toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough marijuana to induce death. Marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within the supervised routine of medical care.
Drug Enforcement Administration's [DEA] Chief Administrative Law Judge, Francis L. Young, 1988.

This followed, of course, Nixon's Commission that recommended decriminalization and found no rational reason for current (continuing) law either.

I find our current approach to cannabis is more akin to a mental illness than any use of the substance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I saw that too and my reaction was exactly the same. Xicano Dec 2011 #1
Only a doctor can tell you how to live. cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #2
From my first taste fifty years ago, WHEN CRABS ROAR Dec 2011 #3
Woodward and Bernstein suggest that we follow the money Kennah Dec 2011 #4
Interesting that all of his staff use and he and his brother use and MindMover Dec 2011 #5
I have smoked pot on an almost daily basis for over 35 years. roody Dec 2011 #6
It is a myth. nt Mojorabbit Dec 2011 #7
Your experience is definitely your own as is everyone who uses substances of any kind..... MindMover Dec 2011 #10
Gosh That's an interesting site you have there. hootinholler Dec 2011 #14
About that NIH funding... boppers Dec 2011 #19
thank you for the link....... MindMover Dec 2011 #32
I think the main problem MMJ discussions have are factual distortions. boppers Dec 2011 #35
Maybe because the goals of NIH are not what people think they are.....or MindMover Dec 2011 #39
I know that you read every link and substantive study on marijuana on the link I provided.....in 1hr MindMover Dec 2011 #21
let's look at the stats for those who go into treatment for cannabis RainDog Dec 2011 #24
I totally agree with your summation about treatment for marijuana and avoidance of jail time...... MindMover Dec 2011 #26
your link notes cannabis is no more addictive than caffeine RainDog Dec 2011 #20
oh yea boatloads of money, the average hourly wage is around 11 bucks....for drug counseling.... MindMover Dec 2011 #23
I'm not talking about you RainDog Dec 2011 #27
Yes, certain people are making a shitload of money off of prohibition.... MindMover Dec 2011 #29
I suppose I don't quite understand this statement, then RainDog Dec 2011 #33
I have already explained myself in other replies..... MindMover Dec 2011 #37
Indeed!! CanSocDem Dec 2011 #42
There is no habituation effect to THC. GliderGuider Dec 2011 #8
The stuff you smoked in Nam had a THC content of 7-8%...... MindMover Dec 2011 #11
Users quickly learn to titrate for the desired dose. GliderGuider Dec 2011 #12
I am not arguing your point of recreational substance use for various individual reasons..... MindMover Dec 2011 #13
OK, we have no major disagreements GliderGuider Dec 2011 #15
My experience has been that I have seen many clients/patients that have some minor MindMover Dec 2011 #41
it is totally disingenuous to compare cannabis to huffing gasoline RainDog Dec 2011 #18
Comparing substances is what I do to learn about them so that I can be more MindMover Dec 2011 #25
Because the govt doesn't want to study those who are regular users RainDog Dec 2011 #28
Thank you for these links, I have some good reading to do over these holidays..... MindMover Dec 2011 #31
there were 2700 separate studies published in 2009 RainDog Dec 2011 #34
I agree with everything you wrote with this exception..... MindMover Dec 2011 #36
something that is processed would qualify as a drug, imo RainDog Dec 2011 #40
a study of patients with MS found no increase in dosage - i.e. no tolerance RainDog Dec 2011 #16
When you can't get high anymore, it's time to take a break. DCKit Dec 2011 #30
I didn't watch this series but, it is fredamae Dec 2011 #9
didn't see this RainDog Dec 2011 #17
Total legalization of it would destroy his business model. boppers Dec 2011 #22
Money trumps doing the right thing - yet again - as always under capitalism slay Dec 2011 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The "F*CK YOU" ...»Reply #34