General Discussion

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)

16. Says the person who thinks criticizing the RCC is bigoted hate speech.

Reply to rug (Reply #15)

Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:20 PM

Sep 2015

Because they're the real victims whenever a woman or lgbt person calls out their misogynistic, homophobic policies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

96 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

University of Calif considering recognizing a “right” to be “free from expressions of intolerance. [View all] philosslayer Sep 2015 OP

I'll vote for freedom of speech over thought police. All of us would be offenders of this new CAG Sep 2015 #1

Agree. These policies are born of frustration, that things don't seem to be getting better. reformist2 Sep 2015 #96

Terrible idea. potone Sep 2015 #2

Right, elleng Sep 2015 #4

Would this protect me from being proselatized thereismore Sep 2015 #3

Would they be protected from being called intolerant? rug Sep 2015 #5

That would be very intolerant, therefore prohibited? nt thereismore Sep 2015 #6

Seems to be the case. rug Sep 2015 #8

Fuck religion. PoutrageFatigue Sep 2015 #11

Hear hear! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #13

No bigoted hate speech. rug Sep 2015 #15

Says the person who thinks criticizing the RCC is bigoted hate speech. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #16

That isn't. But what you do is. rug Sep 2015 #17

Post examples of my bigoted hate speech towards religious people. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #18

Yup, deloberate false paraphrase. rug Sep 2015 #19

No, it's put up or shut up time, rug. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #23

That is your example? rug Sep 2015 #28

Where is the evidence that I used bigoted hate speech towards Catholics? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #30

who foxface666 Sep 2015 #31

Seriously? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #32

why foxface666 Sep 2015 #33

Did I say they should fund abortions? I was referring to birth control. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #34

most foxface666 Sep 2015 #36

What does that have to do with what I posted? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #37

In each of those posts. rug Sep 2015 #49

I don't want you to shut up, I want you to post quotes to back up your claim, rug. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #50

Are you unable to admit or deny you think the RCC is a hate group and a criminal organization? rug Sep 2015 #52

Why is this so difficult for you? It's really very simple: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #53

Option 2, evasion. rug Sep 2015 #56

Couldn't do it, eh? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #58

Afraid it's you, bmus, who can't. rug Sep 2015 #60

Post your evidence first and I'll play your game. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #62

Stick with your innuendo, not-so-veiled hatred of a religious group and ipur internet parlor games. rug Sep 2015 #64

Mmmm hmmmmm. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #67

Yup, same old bmus. rug Sep 2015 #70

You refusal to post evidence of your claims is what makes this subthread "simpering and cowardly". beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #71

Your refusal to answer a direct question is more than ample evidence. rug Sep 2015 #72

My my, you are touchy today. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #74

QED rug Sep 2015 #75

" You will not answer a simple direct question" Lordquinton Sep 2015 #94

Looks like he chose the "shut up" option. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #44

Then you should not have the slightest difficlty in stating what those "true colars" are. rug Sep 2015 #48

He probably should have. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #59

I'm praying for a cave-in. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #87

I prayed for hardwood floors and the FSM provided! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #88

What you need now is a cheap rug to throw down cleanhippie Sep 2015 #91

Great idea, they come in handy for puppy training too. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #92

Feel better? rug Sep 2015 #14

or religion. AlbertCat Sep 2015 #22

Oh, I don't know, Albert, just a hunch. rug Sep 2015 #24

In my experience, there are few groups of individuals more useless Warren DeMontague Sep 2015 #7

You haven't met my in-laws. Fla_Democrat Sep 2015 #9

I'd like to nominate the Board of Regents of Nevada kiva Sep 2015 #20

this proposal is intolerant and should be disallowed. nt msongs Sep 2015 #10

Show me on this eraser board where the bad ideas touched you Prism Sep 2015 #12

They should ban evangelical religious activity then, if they're going down that path. Arugula Latte Sep 2015 #21

Can't do that hardluck Sep 2015 #26

Yeah. I remember V.E.Y.C.s (Very Earnest Young Christians) targeting me on Sproul Plaza at Cal. Arugula Latte Sep 2015 #47

You ever run in to Brother Jed and Sister Cindy? hifiguy Sep 2015 #65

I remember them sarisataka Sep 2015 #78

I will always remember, and laugh every time I remember,, hifiguy Sep 2015 #80

Oh, wow, I forgot about them! Arugula Latte Sep 2015 #82

Those characters never turned up at the U of MN hifiguy Sep 2015 #83

Oh, whoops. I missed the UofMN part. Arugula Latte Sep 2015 #84

That sounds pretty intolerant of you (nt) Recursion Sep 2015 #69

There is no right to sheltered from shitty opinions nt arely staircase Sep 2015 #25

Must coddle those minds. Igel Sep 2015 #29

What happened to universities being hotbeds of vigorous debate and controversy? Nye Bevan Sep 2015 #27

Oh fer fuck's sake. X_Digger Sep 2015 #35

No. romanic Sep 2015 #38

I concur in every last word. hifiguy Sep 2015 #66

No one has a right to be "free from … expressions of intolerance," branford Sep 2015 #39

We do not tolerate intolerance. PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #40

I think expressions of intolerance---not from an authority, not from the govt---come under "Freedom WinkyDink Sep 2015 #86

The proposal isn't just stupid, it's dangerous mythology Sep 2015 #41

Interesting. mmonk Sep 2015 #42

Except it wouldn't be "hate speech" that goes away it will be speech, period. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #43

The is no utopia than is without any "hate speech," however you choose to define the term. branford Sep 2015 #93

That's gonna backfire... ileus Sep 2015 #45

So if I said that blind persons shouldn't be truckdrivers, I'd be in violation!!! Yo_Mama Sep 2015 #46

The liberal university myth HassleCat Sep 2015 #51

Well, that does rather depend on the university. hifiguy Sep 2015 #68

By all means let's criminalize political incorrectness! tularetom Sep 2015 #54

Eugene Volokh is trolling again: the policy doesn't say what he claims it does. struggle4progress Sep 2015 #55

Yep. This is the same guy kcr Sep 2015 #73

I'm intolerant of intolerance lunatica Sep 2015 #57

I can think of few things more antithetical hifiguy Sep 2015 #61

The policy statement seems reasonable to me: struggle4progress Sep 2015 #76

Exactly. It is where you decide If what you were taught to believe is what you believe. alphafemale Sep 2015 #77

Eeyup. hifiguy Sep 2015 #79

It's astounding how easy it is kcr Sep 2015 #63

When the founders wrote the 1A they foresaw your post. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #90

Really? Wow! n/t kcr Sep 2015 #95

The long and short, is that these little authoritarians want to ban their opponents, not debate them tritsofme Sep 2015 #81

So I couldn't call Kim Davis a moron on that campus? ("Or religion.") WinkyDink Sep 2015 #85

Terrible idea. College is where you are supposed to learn to critically examine belief systems. Coventina Sep 2015 #89