Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: University of Calif considering recognizing a “right” to be “free from expressions of intolerance. [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)50. I don't want you to shut up, I want you to post quotes to back up your claim, rug.
And dispense with the strawman, he's not going to save you:
Are you now claiming you do not believe the Catholic Church is a criminal orgaaaaaaaniztion or hate group.
Nice attempt at deflection too:
Just say you do not believe the RCC is a hate group or a criminal organization
but I'm not taking the bait.
Still waiting for you to post examples of my bigoted hate speech towards religious people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
University of Calif considering recognizing a “right” to be “free from expressions of intolerance. [View all]
philosslayer
Sep 2015
OP
I'll vote for freedom of speech over thought police. All of us would be offenders of this new
CAG
Sep 2015
#1
Agree. These policies are born of frustration, that things don't seem to be getting better.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#96
Says the person who thinks criticizing the RCC is bigoted hate speech.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#16
Where is the evidence that I used bigoted hate speech towards Catholics?
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#30
Did I say they should fund abortions? I was referring to birth control.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#34
I don't want you to shut up, I want you to post quotes to back up your claim, rug.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#50
Are you unable to admit or deny you think the RCC is a hate group and a criminal organization?
rug
Sep 2015
#52
Stick with your innuendo, not-so-veiled hatred of a religious group and ipur internet parlor games.
rug
Sep 2015
#64
You refusal to post evidence of your claims is what makes this subthread "simpering and cowardly".
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#71
Then you should not have the slightest difficlty in stating what those "true colars" are.
rug
Sep 2015
#48
They should ban evangelical religious activity then, if they're going down that path.
Arugula Latte
Sep 2015
#21
Yeah. I remember V.E.Y.C.s (Very Earnest Young Christians) targeting me on Sproul Plaza at Cal.
Arugula Latte
Sep 2015
#47
What happened to universities being hotbeds of vigorous debate and controversy?
Nye Bevan
Sep 2015
#27
I think expressions of intolerance---not from an authority, not from the govt---come under "Freedom
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#86
Except it wouldn't be "hate speech" that goes away it will be speech, period.
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2015
#43
The is no utopia than is without any "hate speech," however you choose to define the term.
branford
Sep 2015
#93
So if I said that blind persons shouldn't be truckdrivers, I'd be in violation!!!
Yo_Mama
Sep 2015
#46
Eugene Volokh is trolling again: the policy doesn't say what he claims it does.
struggle4progress
Sep 2015
#55
Exactly. It is where you decide If what you were taught to believe is what you believe.
alphafemale
Sep 2015
#77