Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: University of Calif considering recognizing a “right” to be “free from expressions of intolerance. [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)70. Yup, same old bmus.
Same old bullshit.
My sympathies if this statement of yours is true:
"all I hear is ARGLE BARGLE STOP PICKING ON THE RCC YOU UPPITY ATHEIST!!1! "
But since no rational person would take that from this simpering, cowardly subthread, I think I'll just hold on to it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
University of Calif considering recognizing a “right” to be “free from expressions of intolerance. [View all]
philosslayer
Sep 2015
OP
I'll vote for freedom of speech over thought police. All of us would be offenders of this new
CAG
Sep 2015
#1
Agree. These policies are born of frustration, that things don't seem to be getting better.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#96
Says the person who thinks criticizing the RCC is bigoted hate speech.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#16
Where is the evidence that I used bigoted hate speech towards Catholics?
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#30
Did I say they should fund abortions? I was referring to birth control.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#34
I don't want you to shut up, I want you to post quotes to back up your claim, rug.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#50
Are you unable to admit or deny you think the RCC is a hate group and a criminal organization?
rug
Sep 2015
#52
Stick with your innuendo, not-so-veiled hatred of a religious group and ipur internet parlor games.
rug
Sep 2015
#64
You refusal to post evidence of your claims is what makes this subthread "simpering and cowardly".
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#71
Then you should not have the slightest difficlty in stating what those "true colars" are.
rug
Sep 2015
#48
They should ban evangelical religious activity then, if they're going down that path.
Arugula Latte
Sep 2015
#21
Yeah. I remember V.E.Y.C.s (Very Earnest Young Christians) targeting me on Sproul Plaza at Cal.
Arugula Latte
Sep 2015
#47
What happened to universities being hotbeds of vigorous debate and controversy?
Nye Bevan
Sep 2015
#27
I think expressions of intolerance---not from an authority, not from the govt---come under "Freedom
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#86
Except it wouldn't be "hate speech" that goes away it will be speech, period.
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2015
#43
The is no utopia than is without any "hate speech," however you choose to define the term.
branford
Sep 2015
#93
So if I said that blind persons shouldn't be truckdrivers, I'd be in violation!!!
Yo_Mama
Sep 2015
#46
Eugene Volokh is trolling again: the policy doesn't say what he claims it does.
struggle4progress
Sep 2015
#55
Exactly. It is where you decide If what you were taught to believe is what you believe.
alphafemale
Sep 2015
#77