Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
43. Then it is actually about guns for you and not target shooting.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:50 AM
Oct 2015

Since you can shoot targets with other weapons but won't.

That has nothing to do with me.

Its all about you and your gun.

What is the function of a gun? [View all] boston bean Oct 2015 OP
Competitive target shooting. hack89 Oct 2015 #1
Could you live without your target shooting? boston bean Oct 2015 #3
If it represents no threat to you hack89 Oct 2015 #8
Actually, lots of these mass murderer spent a lot of time on the range. boston bean Oct 2015 #12
I am talking about competing in organized shooting competitions hack89 Oct 2015 #31
you will get nowhere without the support of Democratic gun owners. +1 [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #37
+1000 n/t Kang Colby Oct 2015 #251
So true Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #60
Why not? They conflate... meaculpa2011 Oct 2015 #104
Why do we always see pictures of human beings as targets in shooting competitions.. madinmaryland Oct 2015 #227
No you don't. n/t Kang Colby Oct 2015 #247
What about the obstacle course, urban warfare, type shooting that is becoming popular Hoyt Oct 2015 #259
I would say IDPA and IPSC lead that format, I know of no others. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #262
It's brown! DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #269
Factory standard cardboard. n/t oneshooter Oct 2015 #291
Damn! another good narrative blown away. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #304
What about it? eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #266
Bull shit hack89 Oct 2015 #255
Not true. JonathanRackham Oct 2015 #265
Really? GGJohn Oct 2015 #268
You should retract this statement, GGJohn Oct 2015 #274
You mean like these? oneshooter Oct 2015 #293
Where do you get this stuff? Straw Man Oct 2015 #317
Do tell? Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #329
You act like there is absolutely nothing to fear with the conditions we face now. boston bean Oct 2015 #39
I understand that I have never been safer from violent crime my entire life hack89 Oct 2015 #46
Mass shootings rank very low on my list of safety concerns. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #52
Thats what the parents/family and friends of the latest victims of mass murder thought too workinclasszero Oct 2015 #78
A whole lot more families and friends lost people to garden variety murders. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #155
I have nothing to fear Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #61
Statisically, about 30 people die every day in the U.S. in alcohol related car crashes. Adrahil Oct 2015 #188
Could you live without voting? [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #35
There is surprisingly no guarantee for voting in the Constitution... Human101948 Oct 2015 #132
Now imagine Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #171
Where have you been? Human101948 Oct 2015 #203
Not funny, but the repubs are making voting far more harder to do than getting a gun. So thanks madinmaryland Oct 2015 #230
Of course, but you can also live without eating meat but that's kind of silly. ileus Oct 2015 #124
because you don't kill with your gun handmade34 Oct 2015 #20
It is what people choose to with inanimate objects that is significant hack89 Oct 2015 #33
People aren't conflating legal gun owners with murderers kcr Oct 2015 #166
If it's the intent of the designer that matters, lots of guns were made with no such purpose in mind Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #75
Very true Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #84
That would work, if only intent mattered kcr Oct 2015 #172
You can target shoot with bow and arrows, crossbows riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #34
Catering to your irrational fears is not necessary either hack89 Oct 2015 #36
Then it is actually about guns for you and not target shooting. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #43
Again, what threat do I represent to you? hack89 Oct 2015 #48
The guns are the threat. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #58
So they have magical powers that turn me into a killer? hack89 Oct 2015 #65
You do not need a gun to target shoot. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #70
Until you show how my choice represents a threat to the public hack89 Oct 2015 #76
Nope, you can target shoot with other weapons. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #87
Ok nt hack89 Oct 2015 #92
Firearms aren't the threat, GGJohn Oct 2015 #81
Ah, the NRA's favorite talking point riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #90
Just because something is a point raised by the NRA, doesn't make it false. branford Oct 2015 #113
Because that phrase precisely ignores the complex pathology riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #129
And lumping suicides and homicides into the catchall 'gun violence' doesn't? beevul Oct 2015 #192
"Complex pathology" reduced to prohibition? Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #307
Ah, when you can't refute the statement, GGJohn Oct 2015 #215
There are too many bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #150
I actually agree with you that there are too many irresponsible humans GGJohn Oct 2015 #216
Due to my health problems I couldn't use a bow and arrow Boudica the Lyoness Oct 2015 #195
Do you keep that weapon locked away at the shooting range? madinmaryland Oct 2015 #232
Do you keep securityy locks on your kitchrn knives? oneshooter Oct 2015 #243
Actually I do. I am concerned that the cats will grow opposable thumbs and come madinmaryland Oct 2015 #318
I have two safes in my home hack89 Oct 2015 #257
In my case, guns for me ARE for target shooting. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #56
Nope, you can competitively target shoot with other weapons. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #66
By saying "nope," what statement of mine are you attempting to refute? Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #69
That your guns are nobody's business but yours riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #79
But it is true. GGJohn Oct 2015 #83
At the moment that's true riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #94
Why do you feel you have a right or a need to know what firearms I own? eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #218
I would need to see proof that eliminating said hobby has a direct relationship Rex Oct 2015 #114
But it has brought down bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #152
They do that, but how do we convince people to give up their assault weapons Rex Oct 2015 #173
Not everywhere. aikoaiko Oct 2015 #180
I think you replied to the wrong post Rex. GGJohn Oct 2015 #276
Moral judgement? JonathanRackham Oct 2015 #264
Did you perhaps reply to the wrong post? eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #275
"Every gun owner is up for scrutiny now imo. Why a person owns them cannot simply go unremarked." Brickbat Oct 2015 #85
Okay, that doesn't exactly follow from your actual statement, but fine. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #105
What you "buy" is totally irrelevant. branford Oct 2015 #121
I would bet its near 100% of the mass shooters practiced target shooting. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #137
I never suggested that mass shooters don't go to the target range. branford Oct 2015 #145
Pepper spray is useful against an assailant riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #153
Not really. Straw Man Oct 2015 #315
I have a safer bet. Straw Man Oct 2015 #302
Please complete the following sentence for me... cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #88
Food? riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #91
They have a high nutritional value do they? cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #108
Ok. Let me clarify, their sole purpose is to help obtain food riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #112
Why do you avoid using the word KILLING? "Obtain food"? cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #119
*shrug* ok. Used to kill for food. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #140
Yeah, that's why they have never been used dumbcat Oct 2015 #127
The nature of warfare changed dramatically with the intro of guns riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #143
And it will change again dumbcat Oct 2015 #175
The nature of warfare ... Straw Man Oct 2015 #300
In the 12th century they were weapons of mass destruction and were owned by the 1%'ers of the time.. madinmaryland Oct 2015 #233
Maybe go read the OP. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #235
Oh. Ok. Then you agree with the OP. I misinterpreted what you said, then. I'm sorry. nt madinmaryland Oct 2015 #237
You can also target shoot with muzzle loaders. ileus Oct 2015 #128
Muzzle loaders fall into the gun category nt riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #158
target shooting is nothing more than improving one's ability to kill more accurately DrDan Oct 2015 #103
So why do so few gun owners actually shoot someone hack89 Oct 2015 #107
no one is claiming all gunowners kill something/someone - only that the purpose of a gun is to kill DrDan Oct 2015 #111
What matters is the purpose to which the owner applies the gun hack89 Oct 2015 #116
you may put a piece of paper on the butt of a gun and write a note - DrDan Oct 2015 #131
So the actions of the owner are completely irrelevant? hack89 Oct 2015 #133
Thats where they want to take it. beevul Oct 2015 #197
no Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #135
what is duck hunting? DrDan Oct 2015 #138
a nickname Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #139
neither do I - but I do not find it repugnant if the bird is eaten DrDan Oct 2015 #147
Love turkey, not so much duck Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #154
His screen name refers to an Anti Aircraft unit. GGJohn Oct 2015 #220
Those "few gun owners" who "shoot someone" are the problem riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #118
Conflating legal gun owners with mass murderers? hack89 Oct 2015 #120
If the 99.9x percent are suspect in your eyes, due to the actions of .0x percent... beevul Oct 2015 #198
Cause many are fine with just intimidating people, and profiting from gunz. Hoyt Oct 2015 #260
That's nice. Nt hack89 Oct 2015 #263
Like a robber who locks the door? DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #271
And horseshoes is even more insidious and evil: It's practice for killing people with skinny necks. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #242
A tool competently designed to tear thru paper targets... stone space Oct 2015 #156
There are many things in life that one can be fearful of hack89 Oct 2015 #160
That's because your rifles can only tear thru papar. stone space Oct 2015 #163
No. It is because rifles are rarely used to kill people hack89 Oct 2015 #164
How do you kill somebody with a tool... stone space Oct 2015 #169
I know you think you are being witty hack89 Oct 2015 #170
I suppose ... Straw Man Oct 2015 #303
So, sort of like playing lawn darts? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #204
Lawn darts are too damn dangerous hack89 Oct 2015 #206
Keep going on this train of thought Scootaloo Oct 2015 #207
Sure - toys should not be dangerous hack89 Oct 2015 #209
How seriously should they be treated? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #210
Very. hack89 Oct 2015 #211
Two things... TipTok Oct 2015 #2
So, the use even in self defense is to kill. boston bean Oct 2015 #5
As stated before... TipTok Oct 2015 #15
Killing another person with a gun pointed at you I presume, right? boston bean Oct 2015 #21
Someone or something with the means and intent to cause harm.. TipTok Oct 2015 #53
Assailants need not always possess a firearm to be extremely dangerous. branford Oct 2015 #134
In my case... Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #159
Sort of. The use is to STOP the attacker. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #62
A person has the right to kill in self defense if he is facing an attacker who ... spin Oct 2015 #277
You guys really think seeming rational will trump reality don't you? onehandle Oct 2015 #27
Appeal to emotion... TipTok Oct 2015 #28
One of the controllers Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #63
Bookmarked for later. This has potential to be epic. You have hit the nail on the head. nt Electric Monk Oct 2015 #4
kick (nt) Electric Monk Oct 2015 #327
Hack has a point: I shoot at paper targets Recursion Oct 2015 #6
Why do people need to use a gun explicitly made for killing others boston bean Oct 2015 #7
Are there guns not "explicitly made for killing others"? Recursion Oct 2015 #9
Why don't you tell me? boston bean Oct 2015 #13
Because I'm trying to listen to your argument? Recursion Oct 2015 #16
Guns are made for killing. boston bean Oct 2015 #17
OK, that's what I was asking Recursion Oct 2015 #18
Stone-cold ... Straw Man Oct 2015 #306
If you are looking for a connection between "all of these mass murderers" pipoman Oct 2015 #38
You can't say that Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #64
If you want to absolve yourself of having to talk about gun violence.... Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #74
Except that isn't the conversation is it.. pipoman Oct 2015 #80
Really? Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #95
The numbers indicate that it isn't a 'gun problem'. beevul Oct 2015 #208
Do you realize Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #219
Actually, the 300,000 would be a 10th of 300,000,000, GGJohn Oct 2015 #221
Just did some looking and... Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #229
You're attempting to shift the debate. beevul Oct 2015 #238
According to some Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #248
Bad guys aren't the problem? beevul Oct 2015 #252
Bad guys Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #258
Then obviously going after them is the right thing to do. beevul Oct 2015 #261
Who is them? Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #270
Them: Bad guys. N/T beevul Oct 2015 #273
The numbers most certainly do indicate we have a problem. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #283
Nobody here claims we don't have 'a problem'. beevul Oct 2015 #286
But you're clearly saying that there isn't a gun problem. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #287
in fairness, I added to the post you're responding to. beevul Oct 2015 #288
You're splitting hairs now. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #295
What you call splitting hairs, I call clearing the muddy waters. beevul Oct 2015 #298
The problem is you're putting white hats and black hats on people..... Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #308
And you're pretending that there are no white hats. beevul Oct 2015 #309
Zero summing it into white hate/black hat is a foolish way of thinking of it. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #313
Only when one disagrees with the figures in question. beevul Oct 2015 #316
You're spinning the numbers to avoid talking about the issue. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #320
No. Just no. beevul Oct 2015 #321
The problem is still guns, no matter how you want to move away from it. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #322
The problem can not be guns. beevul Oct 2015 #323
The problem with your "99.9%" claim is that it's fatally fluid. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #324
So you say. beevul Oct 2015 #325
Mental illness is, at best, 50% of the connection. flamin lib Oct 2015 #110
Only if you are intentionally ignoring the elephant in the corner... pipoman Oct 2015 #178
Shooting at paper targets could reasonably be considered practice killing. MillennialDem Oct 2015 #10
I guess? I also fence. Recursion Oct 2015 #14
The purpose of all weapons is to injury or kill. Hence the name "weapon". I find that the gun Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #19
Shrug Recursion Oct 2015 #23
My fishing gear is a 'weapon' so why don't you focus on that too? [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #44
Yeah, fencing is a real problem here in New Haven! All these fencers are going around CTyankee Oct 2015 #331
How about skeet, or trap? oneshooter Oct 2015 #196
Shooting at the target is rehearsal treestar Oct 2015 #40
Target practice makes the difference Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #45
+1000. eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #47
Hunting doesn't bother me treestar Oct 2015 #54
Respectfully, if you do not believe the risks are worth the fun, branford Oct 2015 #142
To put little holes in things. bemildred Oct 2015 #11
That reminds me, I've got to file some papers away in a three ring binder. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #71
Heh. Now that's some target practice. bemildred Oct 2015 #97
The purpose of a firearm is to GGJohn Oct 2015 #22
Exactly correct. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #68
Primarily to kill people. Secondarily to instill fear in a terroristic manner. onehandle Oct 2015 #24
The second only works because of the primary purpose of the design loyalsister Oct 2015 #181
What's wrong with shooting a rapist, home invader, stalker or other violent criminal? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #25
Not much. But then what is the likelihood? treestar Oct 2015 #41
Rights aren't subject to precentages or wild speculation about being disarmed by ninja burglars. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #77
or your little brother, a random shoplifter, or that guy who just got car jacked.... and that bettyellen Oct 2015 #267
If you believe you can prohibit a thing to all based on the misues or abuse of a scant minority then Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #279
It's not the gun's fault. It's the gun-culture's fault. DetlefK Oct 2015 #26
No country has similar levels of gun ownership pipoman Oct 2015 #42
And no country has similar levels of gun violence. flamin lib Oct 2015 #115
Eliminate black cars and eliminate accidents or just black car accidents? pipoman Oct 2015 #179
"And no country has similar levels of gun violence" Not the least bit true.. EX500rider Oct 2015 #186
Here is one question I have for people that own guns for protection world wide wally Oct 2015 #29
Ask the criminals who might break into my house. [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #49
How often has that happened? world wide wally Oct 2015 #55
None of that Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #72
How many fires do you expect? Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #67
Everyone that's attacked had it coming??? ileus Oct 2015 #130
gives way too many people a sense of self-worth. KG Oct 2015 #30
History is your friend pipoman Oct 2015 #32
It was invented as an offensive weapon... Javaman Oct 2015 #51
And knives started as rocks...who gives a shit? pipoman Oct 2015 #57
nice non-sequitor. Javaman Oct 2015 #86
For those of you bringing up target shooting, please keep this in mind: Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #50
+1000 nt riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #99
John Prine said it very well in a song about the death and destruction of a small town loyalsister Oct 2015 #182
Crossbows, compound bows Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #59
Alert us, the next time some maniac uses a crossbow to turn a classroom into a slaughterhouse. (nt) Paladin Oct 2015 #73
Just answered the question Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #82
Naw the mass killers favor military type assault weapons like workinclasszero Oct 2015 #89
Very true, unfortunately. (nt) Paladin Oct 2015 #101
acually no Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #117
Food. You don't even need a gun to catch food really riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #100
Who cares? GGJohn Oct 2015 #223
What if Predator was a documentary? Facility Inspector Oct 2015 #93
Actually the Predator kills himself. geomon666 Oct 2015 #98
What if Terminator was a documentary Facility Inspector Oct 2015 #102
They kill the Terminator with a hydraulic press. geomon666 Oct 2015 #106
I'm in Minnesota sarisataka Oct 2015 #123
There's no reasoning with people who have gun fetishes. hunter Oct 2015 #96
Where is "Gun Fetishist" in DSM? Facility Inspector Oct 2015 #109
made up Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #136
I'm a great stew of OCD behaviors. hunter Oct 2015 #151
Not even remotely the same thing. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #126
three functions... ileus Oct 2015 #122
To propel projectiles at high speeds. Act_of_Reparation Oct 2015 #125
Security blanket for those who are mentally still children frizzled Oct 2015 #141
You just accused 80-100+ million of your fellow Americans, branford Oct 2015 #148
Demonizing the mentally ill isn't helpful, and abouta third of people will have it in their lifetime frizzled Oct 2015 #149
You can't prove that firearm ownership is dropping. eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #226
nytimes.com/2013/03/10/us/rate-of-gun-ownership-is-down-survey-shows.html frizzled Oct 2015 #278
It's far more likely that with the ongoing attempt to stigmatize gun owners, GGJohn Oct 2015 #280
When all else fails, deny the facts - the NRA's never been more powerful frizzled Oct 2015 #299
WTF!!!! GGJohn Oct 2015 #225
I own one to shoot and possibly kill an intruder who intends to harm my family. Throd Oct 2015 #144
Personally, I have no objection to that; however... Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #161
I have considered all your points and more. Throd Oct 2015 #165
Buy a quality weapon, then. Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #168
"a panic button is effective in summoning the police quickly" EX500rider Oct 2015 #193
Didn't you get the memo? beevul Oct 2015 #199
Not a lot of armed home invasions in unincorporated counties out in the middle of nowhere Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #282
Not alot? Thats true, however... beevul Oct 2015 #284
Generally, the cops are at my house in a minute or less Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #281
I don't live where you do. Police response time tends to be much longer. Throd Oct 2015 #292
I live about 150 steps from a Starbucks. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #294
..and that's fine Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #297
Who's obsessed? EX500rider Oct 2015 #305
I have a smoke detector, and i have a fire extinguisher Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #310
In 30 years of firearm ownership none of mine have done those things either. EX500rider Oct 2015 #311
That's great! Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #312
To end life. zappaman Oct 2015 #146
A gun - like a sling, bow, or throwing arm - delivers a projectile to a target Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #157
Kill! Kill! Kill! HassleCat Oct 2015 #162
Penile extension? KamaAina Oct 2015 #167
Hasn't worked yet... cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #174
Over your cold.... workinclasszero Oct 2015 #176
The function of a gun is to shoot, not kill LittleBlue Oct 2015 #177
For the first time ever, I agree with you completely. hifiguy Oct 2015 #183
The function of a gun is sarisataka Oct 2015 #184
Can haz pew nau? Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #185
Ok... sarisataka Oct 2015 #187
... Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #189
When the chips are down sarisataka Oct 2015 #191
I'm with you there, Sarisataka. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #194
The moral of the story sarisataka Oct 2015 #200
Aye. But sometimes, the problem requires a gun. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #205
You gallifreyans and your guns... beevul Oct 2015 #236
Go home Magneto, you're drunk. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #241
. sarisataka Oct 2015 #244
I'm a rascal... beevul Oct 2015 #250
... WAT Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #253
You should see what I turned up on ancestry.com!! beevul Oct 2015 #254
Photo of the grandkids...? Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #256
Thats easy. beevul Oct 2015 #190
Killing something/someone is often a legitimate purpose. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2015 #201
The function of a gun is to send a projectile out of its muzzle at a high rate of speed Waldorf Oct 2015 #202
Vial. REP Oct 2015 #212
Ever heard of a flare gun? OakCliffDem Oct 2015 #213
Ever heard of a line throwing gun? OakCliffDem Oct 2015 #214
I want my 2nd amendment right. PowerToThePeople Oct 2015 #217
Food. Blue_In_AK Oct 2015 #222
Nope: Make gun makers and sellers rich. lindysalsagal Oct 2015 #224
I agree 100% me b zola Oct 2015 #228
What about alcohol? hack89 Oct 2015 #285
To intoxicate, in and of itself, is non-lethal me b zola Oct 2015 #289
But guns cannot have a positive social action? hack89 Oct 2015 #290
FACT: A gun is a weapon liberal N proud Oct 2015 #231
^^ This ^^ madinmaryland Oct 2015 #234
Did it ever occur to you that it's obviously a weapon, so why refute it? n/t Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #239
And a knife is a weapon. n/t oneshooter Oct 2015 #245
When was the last time you heard of a mass knife attack? liberal N proud Oct 2015 #319
They happen... Marengo Oct 2015 #328
Fact check sarisataka Oct 2015 #246
If guns are designed solely to kill, then are the majority of them somehow defective? X_Digger Oct 2015 #240
A sporting instrument... Kang Colby Oct 2015 #249
A question ma'am DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #272
To shoot holes in a trash burning barrel? B Calm Oct 2015 #296
This is one of the funniest threads deathrind Oct 2015 #301
You can take this from me from my cold, dead hands. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #314
STOP IT TOMMY_CARCETTI Skittles Oct 2015 #333
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #326
It is a weapon. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #330
2nd amendment Daninmo Oct 2015 #332
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is the function of a...»Reply #43