Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
221. Actually, the 300,000 would be a 10th of 300,000,000,
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:58 PM
Oct 2015

Last edited Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:41 PM - Edit history (1)

in this case, he's saying that only 1/10 of 1% use their firearms illegally, which would add up to 30,000 people.

What is the function of a gun? [View all] boston bean Oct 2015 OP
Competitive target shooting. hack89 Oct 2015 #1
Could you live without your target shooting? boston bean Oct 2015 #3
If it represents no threat to you hack89 Oct 2015 #8
Actually, lots of these mass murderer spent a lot of time on the range. boston bean Oct 2015 #12
I am talking about competing in organized shooting competitions hack89 Oct 2015 #31
you will get nowhere without the support of Democratic gun owners. +1 [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #37
+1000 n/t Kang Colby Oct 2015 #251
So true Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #60
Why not? They conflate... meaculpa2011 Oct 2015 #104
Why do we always see pictures of human beings as targets in shooting competitions.. madinmaryland Oct 2015 #227
No you don't. n/t Kang Colby Oct 2015 #247
What about the obstacle course, urban warfare, type shooting that is becoming popular Hoyt Oct 2015 #259
I would say IDPA and IPSC lead that format, I know of no others. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #262
It's brown! DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #269
Factory standard cardboard. n/t oneshooter Oct 2015 #291
Damn! another good narrative blown away. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #304
What about it? eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #266
Bull shit hack89 Oct 2015 #255
Not true. JonathanRackham Oct 2015 #265
Really? GGJohn Oct 2015 #268
You should retract this statement, GGJohn Oct 2015 #274
You mean like these? oneshooter Oct 2015 #293
Where do you get this stuff? Straw Man Oct 2015 #317
Do tell? Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #329
You act like there is absolutely nothing to fear with the conditions we face now. boston bean Oct 2015 #39
I understand that I have never been safer from violent crime my entire life hack89 Oct 2015 #46
Mass shootings rank very low on my list of safety concerns. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #52
Thats what the parents/family and friends of the latest victims of mass murder thought too workinclasszero Oct 2015 #78
A whole lot more families and friends lost people to garden variety murders. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #155
I have nothing to fear Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #61
Statisically, about 30 people die every day in the U.S. in alcohol related car crashes. Adrahil Oct 2015 #188
Could you live without voting? [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #35
There is surprisingly no guarantee for voting in the Constitution... Human101948 Oct 2015 #132
Now imagine Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #171
Where have you been? Human101948 Oct 2015 #203
Not funny, but the repubs are making voting far more harder to do than getting a gun. So thanks madinmaryland Oct 2015 #230
Of course, but you can also live without eating meat but that's kind of silly. ileus Oct 2015 #124
because you don't kill with your gun handmade34 Oct 2015 #20
It is what people choose to with inanimate objects that is significant hack89 Oct 2015 #33
People aren't conflating legal gun owners with murderers kcr Oct 2015 #166
If it's the intent of the designer that matters, lots of guns were made with no such purpose in mind Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #75
Very true Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #84
That would work, if only intent mattered kcr Oct 2015 #172
You can target shoot with bow and arrows, crossbows riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #34
Catering to your irrational fears is not necessary either hack89 Oct 2015 #36
Then it is actually about guns for you and not target shooting. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #43
Again, what threat do I represent to you? hack89 Oct 2015 #48
The guns are the threat. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #58
So they have magical powers that turn me into a killer? hack89 Oct 2015 #65
You do not need a gun to target shoot. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #70
Until you show how my choice represents a threat to the public hack89 Oct 2015 #76
Nope, you can target shoot with other weapons. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #87
Ok nt hack89 Oct 2015 #92
Firearms aren't the threat, GGJohn Oct 2015 #81
Ah, the NRA's favorite talking point riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #90
Just because something is a point raised by the NRA, doesn't make it false. branford Oct 2015 #113
Because that phrase precisely ignores the complex pathology riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #129
And lumping suicides and homicides into the catchall 'gun violence' doesn't? beevul Oct 2015 #192
"Complex pathology" reduced to prohibition? Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #307
Ah, when you can't refute the statement, GGJohn Oct 2015 #215
There are too many bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #150
I actually agree with you that there are too many irresponsible humans GGJohn Oct 2015 #216
Due to my health problems I couldn't use a bow and arrow Boudica the Lyoness Oct 2015 #195
Do you keep that weapon locked away at the shooting range? madinmaryland Oct 2015 #232
Do you keep securityy locks on your kitchrn knives? oneshooter Oct 2015 #243
Actually I do. I am concerned that the cats will grow opposable thumbs and come madinmaryland Oct 2015 #318
I have two safes in my home hack89 Oct 2015 #257
In my case, guns for me ARE for target shooting. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #56
Nope, you can competitively target shoot with other weapons. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #66
By saying "nope," what statement of mine are you attempting to refute? Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #69
That your guns are nobody's business but yours riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #79
But it is true. GGJohn Oct 2015 #83
At the moment that's true riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #94
Why do you feel you have a right or a need to know what firearms I own? eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #218
I would need to see proof that eliminating said hobby has a direct relationship Rex Oct 2015 #114
But it has brought down bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #152
They do that, but how do we convince people to give up their assault weapons Rex Oct 2015 #173
Not everywhere. aikoaiko Oct 2015 #180
I think you replied to the wrong post Rex. GGJohn Oct 2015 #276
Moral judgement? JonathanRackham Oct 2015 #264
Did you perhaps reply to the wrong post? eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #275
"Every gun owner is up for scrutiny now imo. Why a person owns them cannot simply go unremarked." Brickbat Oct 2015 #85
Okay, that doesn't exactly follow from your actual statement, but fine. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #105
What you "buy" is totally irrelevant. branford Oct 2015 #121
I would bet its near 100% of the mass shooters practiced target shooting. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #137
I never suggested that mass shooters don't go to the target range. branford Oct 2015 #145
Pepper spray is useful against an assailant riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #153
Not really. Straw Man Oct 2015 #315
I have a safer bet. Straw Man Oct 2015 #302
Please complete the following sentence for me... cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #88
Food? riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #91
They have a high nutritional value do they? cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #108
Ok. Let me clarify, their sole purpose is to help obtain food riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #112
Why do you avoid using the word KILLING? "Obtain food"? cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #119
*shrug* ok. Used to kill for food. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #140
Yeah, that's why they have never been used dumbcat Oct 2015 #127
The nature of warfare changed dramatically with the intro of guns riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #143
And it will change again dumbcat Oct 2015 #175
The nature of warfare ... Straw Man Oct 2015 #300
In the 12th century they were weapons of mass destruction and were owned by the 1%'ers of the time.. madinmaryland Oct 2015 #233
Maybe go read the OP. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #235
Oh. Ok. Then you agree with the OP. I misinterpreted what you said, then. I'm sorry. nt madinmaryland Oct 2015 #237
You can also target shoot with muzzle loaders. ileus Oct 2015 #128
Muzzle loaders fall into the gun category nt riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #158
target shooting is nothing more than improving one's ability to kill more accurately DrDan Oct 2015 #103
So why do so few gun owners actually shoot someone hack89 Oct 2015 #107
no one is claiming all gunowners kill something/someone - only that the purpose of a gun is to kill DrDan Oct 2015 #111
What matters is the purpose to which the owner applies the gun hack89 Oct 2015 #116
you may put a piece of paper on the butt of a gun and write a note - DrDan Oct 2015 #131
So the actions of the owner are completely irrelevant? hack89 Oct 2015 #133
Thats where they want to take it. beevul Oct 2015 #197
no Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #135
what is duck hunting? DrDan Oct 2015 #138
a nickname Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #139
neither do I - but I do not find it repugnant if the bird is eaten DrDan Oct 2015 #147
Love turkey, not so much duck Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #154
His screen name refers to an Anti Aircraft unit. GGJohn Oct 2015 #220
Those "few gun owners" who "shoot someone" are the problem riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #118
Conflating legal gun owners with mass murderers? hack89 Oct 2015 #120
If the 99.9x percent are suspect in your eyes, due to the actions of .0x percent... beevul Oct 2015 #198
Cause many are fine with just intimidating people, and profiting from gunz. Hoyt Oct 2015 #260
That's nice. Nt hack89 Oct 2015 #263
Like a robber who locks the door? DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #271
And horseshoes is even more insidious and evil: It's practice for killing people with skinny necks. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #242
A tool competently designed to tear thru paper targets... stone space Oct 2015 #156
There are many things in life that one can be fearful of hack89 Oct 2015 #160
That's because your rifles can only tear thru papar. stone space Oct 2015 #163
No. It is because rifles are rarely used to kill people hack89 Oct 2015 #164
How do you kill somebody with a tool... stone space Oct 2015 #169
I know you think you are being witty hack89 Oct 2015 #170
I suppose ... Straw Man Oct 2015 #303
So, sort of like playing lawn darts? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #204
Lawn darts are too damn dangerous hack89 Oct 2015 #206
Keep going on this train of thought Scootaloo Oct 2015 #207
Sure - toys should not be dangerous hack89 Oct 2015 #209
How seriously should they be treated? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #210
Very. hack89 Oct 2015 #211
Two things... TipTok Oct 2015 #2
So, the use even in self defense is to kill. boston bean Oct 2015 #5
As stated before... TipTok Oct 2015 #15
Killing another person with a gun pointed at you I presume, right? boston bean Oct 2015 #21
Someone or something with the means and intent to cause harm.. TipTok Oct 2015 #53
Assailants need not always possess a firearm to be extremely dangerous. branford Oct 2015 #134
In my case... Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #159
Sort of. The use is to STOP the attacker. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #62
A person has the right to kill in self defense if he is facing an attacker who ... spin Oct 2015 #277
You guys really think seeming rational will trump reality don't you? onehandle Oct 2015 #27
Appeal to emotion... TipTok Oct 2015 #28
One of the controllers Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #63
Bookmarked for later. This has potential to be epic. You have hit the nail on the head. nt Electric Monk Oct 2015 #4
kick (nt) Electric Monk Oct 2015 #327
Hack has a point: I shoot at paper targets Recursion Oct 2015 #6
Why do people need to use a gun explicitly made for killing others boston bean Oct 2015 #7
Are there guns not "explicitly made for killing others"? Recursion Oct 2015 #9
Why don't you tell me? boston bean Oct 2015 #13
Because I'm trying to listen to your argument? Recursion Oct 2015 #16
Guns are made for killing. boston bean Oct 2015 #17
OK, that's what I was asking Recursion Oct 2015 #18
Stone-cold ... Straw Man Oct 2015 #306
If you are looking for a connection between "all of these mass murderers" pipoman Oct 2015 #38
You can't say that Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #64
If you want to absolve yourself of having to talk about gun violence.... Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #74
Except that isn't the conversation is it.. pipoman Oct 2015 #80
Really? Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #95
The numbers indicate that it isn't a 'gun problem'. beevul Oct 2015 #208
Do you realize Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #219
Actually, the 300,000 would be a 10th of 300,000,000, GGJohn Oct 2015 #221
Just did some looking and... Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #229
You're attempting to shift the debate. beevul Oct 2015 #238
According to some Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #248
Bad guys aren't the problem? beevul Oct 2015 #252
Bad guys Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #258
Then obviously going after them is the right thing to do. beevul Oct 2015 #261
Who is them? Ford F-150 Oct 2015 #270
Them: Bad guys. N/T beevul Oct 2015 #273
The numbers most certainly do indicate we have a problem. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #283
Nobody here claims we don't have 'a problem'. beevul Oct 2015 #286
But you're clearly saying that there isn't a gun problem. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #287
in fairness, I added to the post you're responding to. beevul Oct 2015 #288
You're splitting hairs now. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #295
What you call splitting hairs, I call clearing the muddy waters. beevul Oct 2015 #298
The problem is you're putting white hats and black hats on people..... Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #308
And you're pretending that there are no white hats. beevul Oct 2015 #309
Zero summing it into white hate/black hat is a foolish way of thinking of it. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #313
Only when one disagrees with the figures in question. beevul Oct 2015 #316
You're spinning the numbers to avoid talking about the issue. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #320
No. Just no. beevul Oct 2015 #321
The problem is still guns, no matter how you want to move away from it. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #322
The problem can not be guns. beevul Oct 2015 #323
The problem with your "99.9%" claim is that it's fatally fluid. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #324
So you say. beevul Oct 2015 #325
Mental illness is, at best, 50% of the connection. flamin lib Oct 2015 #110
Only if you are intentionally ignoring the elephant in the corner... pipoman Oct 2015 #178
Shooting at paper targets could reasonably be considered practice killing. MillennialDem Oct 2015 #10
I guess? I also fence. Recursion Oct 2015 #14
The purpose of all weapons is to injury or kill. Hence the name "weapon". I find that the gun Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #19
Shrug Recursion Oct 2015 #23
My fishing gear is a 'weapon' so why don't you focus on that too? [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #44
Yeah, fencing is a real problem here in New Haven! All these fencers are going around CTyankee Oct 2015 #331
How about skeet, or trap? oneshooter Oct 2015 #196
Shooting at the target is rehearsal treestar Oct 2015 #40
Target practice makes the difference Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #45
+1000. eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #47
Hunting doesn't bother me treestar Oct 2015 #54
Respectfully, if you do not believe the risks are worth the fun, branford Oct 2015 #142
To put little holes in things. bemildred Oct 2015 #11
That reminds me, I've got to file some papers away in a three ring binder. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #71
Heh. Now that's some target practice. bemildred Oct 2015 #97
The purpose of a firearm is to GGJohn Oct 2015 #22
Exactly correct. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #68
Primarily to kill people. Secondarily to instill fear in a terroristic manner. onehandle Oct 2015 #24
The second only works because of the primary purpose of the design loyalsister Oct 2015 #181
What's wrong with shooting a rapist, home invader, stalker or other violent criminal? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #25
Not much. But then what is the likelihood? treestar Oct 2015 #41
Rights aren't subject to precentages or wild speculation about being disarmed by ninja burglars. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #77
or your little brother, a random shoplifter, or that guy who just got car jacked.... and that bettyellen Oct 2015 #267
If you believe you can prohibit a thing to all based on the misues or abuse of a scant minority then Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #279
It's not the gun's fault. It's the gun-culture's fault. DetlefK Oct 2015 #26
No country has similar levels of gun ownership pipoman Oct 2015 #42
And no country has similar levels of gun violence. flamin lib Oct 2015 #115
Eliminate black cars and eliminate accidents or just black car accidents? pipoman Oct 2015 #179
"And no country has similar levels of gun violence" Not the least bit true.. EX500rider Oct 2015 #186
Here is one question I have for people that own guns for protection world wide wally Oct 2015 #29
Ask the criminals who might break into my house. [nt] Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #49
How often has that happened? world wide wally Oct 2015 #55
None of that Ichigo Kurosaki Oct 2015 #72
How many fires do you expect? Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #67
Everyone that's attacked had it coming??? ileus Oct 2015 #130
gives way too many people a sense of self-worth. KG Oct 2015 #30
History is your friend pipoman Oct 2015 #32
It was invented as an offensive weapon... Javaman Oct 2015 #51
And knives started as rocks...who gives a shit? pipoman Oct 2015 #57
nice non-sequitor. Javaman Oct 2015 #86
For those of you bringing up target shooting, please keep this in mind: Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #50
+1000 nt riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #99
John Prine said it very well in a song about the death and destruction of a small town loyalsister Oct 2015 #182
Crossbows, compound bows Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #59
Alert us, the next time some maniac uses a crossbow to turn a classroom into a slaughterhouse. (nt) Paladin Oct 2015 #73
Just answered the question Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #82
Naw the mass killers favor military type assault weapons like workinclasszero Oct 2015 #89
Very true, unfortunately. (nt) Paladin Oct 2015 #101
acually no Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #117
Food. You don't even need a gun to catch food really riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #100
Who cares? GGJohn Oct 2015 #223
What if Predator was a documentary? Facility Inspector Oct 2015 #93
Actually the Predator kills himself. geomon666 Oct 2015 #98
What if Terminator was a documentary Facility Inspector Oct 2015 #102
They kill the Terminator with a hydraulic press. geomon666 Oct 2015 #106
I'm in Minnesota sarisataka Oct 2015 #123
There's no reasoning with people who have gun fetishes. hunter Oct 2015 #96
Where is "Gun Fetishist" in DSM? Facility Inspector Oct 2015 #109
made up Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #136
I'm a great stew of OCD behaviors. hunter Oct 2015 #151
Not even remotely the same thing. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #126
three functions... ileus Oct 2015 #122
To propel projectiles at high speeds. Act_of_Reparation Oct 2015 #125
Security blanket for those who are mentally still children frizzled Oct 2015 #141
You just accused 80-100+ million of your fellow Americans, branford Oct 2015 #148
Demonizing the mentally ill isn't helpful, and abouta third of people will have it in their lifetime frizzled Oct 2015 #149
You can't prove that firearm ownership is dropping. eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #226
nytimes.com/2013/03/10/us/rate-of-gun-ownership-is-down-survey-shows.html frizzled Oct 2015 #278
It's far more likely that with the ongoing attempt to stigmatize gun owners, GGJohn Oct 2015 #280
When all else fails, deny the facts - the NRA's never been more powerful frizzled Oct 2015 #299
WTF!!!! GGJohn Oct 2015 #225
I own one to shoot and possibly kill an intruder who intends to harm my family. Throd Oct 2015 #144
Personally, I have no objection to that; however... Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #161
I have considered all your points and more. Throd Oct 2015 #165
Buy a quality weapon, then. Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #168
"a panic button is effective in summoning the police quickly" EX500rider Oct 2015 #193
Didn't you get the memo? beevul Oct 2015 #199
Not a lot of armed home invasions in unincorporated counties out in the middle of nowhere Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #282
Not alot? Thats true, however... beevul Oct 2015 #284
Generally, the cops are at my house in a minute or less Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #281
I don't live where you do. Police response time tends to be much longer. Throd Oct 2015 #292
I live about 150 steps from a Starbucks. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #294
..and that's fine Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #297
Who's obsessed? EX500rider Oct 2015 #305
I have a smoke detector, and i have a fire extinguisher Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #310
In 30 years of firearm ownership none of mine have done those things either. EX500rider Oct 2015 #311
That's great! Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #312
To end life. zappaman Oct 2015 #146
A gun - like a sling, bow, or throwing arm - delivers a projectile to a target Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2015 #157
Kill! Kill! Kill! HassleCat Oct 2015 #162
Penile extension? KamaAina Oct 2015 #167
Hasn't worked yet... cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #174
Over your cold.... workinclasszero Oct 2015 #176
The function of a gun is to shoot, not kill LittleBlue Oct 2015 #177
For the first time ever, I agree with you completely. hifiguy Oct 2015 #183
The function of a gun is sarisataka Oct 2015 #184
Can haz pew nau? Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #185
Ok... sarisataka Oct 2015 #187
... Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #189
When the chips are down sarisataka Oct 2015 #191
I'm with you there, Sarisataka. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #194
The moral of the story sarisataka Oct 2015 #200
Aye. But sometimes, the problem requires a gun. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #205
You gallifreyans and your guns... beevul Oct 2015 #236
Go home Magneto, you're drunk. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #241
. sarisataka Oct 2015 #244
I'm a rascal... beevul Oct 2015 #250
... WAT Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #253
You should see what I turned up on ancestry.com!! beevul Oct 2015 #254
Photo of the grandkids...? Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #256
Thats easy. beevul Oct 2015 #190
Killing something/someone is often a legitimate purpose. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2015 #201
The function of a gun is to send a projectile out of its muzzle at a high rate of speed Waldorf Oct 2015 #202
Vial. REP Oct 2015 #212
Ever heard of a flare gun? OakCliffDem Oct 2015 #213
Ever heard of a line throwing gun? OakCliffDem Oct 2015 #214
I want my 2nd amendment right. PowerToThePeople Oct 2015 #217
Food. Blue_In_AK Oct 2015 #222
Nope: Make gun makers and sellers rich. lindysalsagal Oct 2015 #224
I agree 100% me b zola Oct 2015 #228
What about alcohol? hack89 Oct 2015 #285
To intoxicate, in and of itself, is non-lethal me b zola Oct 2015 #289
But guns cannot have a positive social action? hack89 Oct 2015 #290
FACT: A gun is a weapon liberal N proud Oct 2015 #231
^^ This ^^ madinmaryland Oct 2015 #234
Did it ever occur to you that it's obviously a weapon, so why refute it? n/t Decoy of Fenris Oct 2015 #239
And a knife is a weapon. n/t oneshooter Oct 2015 #245
When was the last time you heard of a mass knife attack? liberal N proud Oct 2015 #319
They happen... Marengo Oct 2015 #328
Fact check sarisataka Oct 2015 #246
If guns are designed solely to kill, then are the majority of them somehow defective? X_Digger Oct 2015 #240
A sporting instrument... Kang Colby Oct 2015 #249
A question ma'am DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #272
To shoot holes in a trash burning barrel? B Calm Oct 2015 #296
This is one of the funniest threads deathrind Oct 2015 #301
You can take this from me from my cold, dead hands. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #314
STOP IT TOMMY_CARCETTI Skittles Oct 2015 #333
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #326
It is a weapon. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #330
2nd amendment Daninmo Oct 2015 #332
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is the function of a...»Reply #221