Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(8,776 posts)
24. "Organic" farming can fill an economic and food quality niche.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:59 PM
Oct 2015

Until 2006 I leased (as lessor) an 8 acre organic farm in Humboldt county, CA (a local who shops at the Arcata or Eureka farmers markets would recognize various tenants from the 1980s to 2006). Prior to the coming of the "organic farmers" the site had been used by my family (since 1869) for family garden, irrigated pasture, and in the 70s to mid 80s part was in alfalfa. The alfalfa was for our own calves and horses and the excess sold locally. The alfalfa was not viable in and of itself.

The last tenant specialized in "heirloom" varieties of perishables (tomatoes, peppers, summer squash, herbs, greens, etc.) and sold at the coastal farmers markets, restaurants (local and San Francisco Bay Area), and bulk to non-corporate groceries (Arcata Coop).

In 2003 I had reason for a real estate appraisal and the tenant provided me his Schedule C tax form. In 2002 the small farm and marketing by the tenant netted $103,000 to the tenant farmer. The product was unprocessed fresh vegetables retail at the farmers markets or wholesale to the restaurants and groceries. Costs included wages, insurance, water (irrigation and sanitary), tractor, irrigation equipment, refrigerator truck, waxed boxes, seeds, manure and compost, bookkeeping, portapotty, and, of course, payment to the landlord. I would guess 5-6 FTE employees (more individuals but seasonal) besides the proprietor.

The "heirloom" vegetables are more perishable and flavorful that run of the mill corporate product. They also sold for a considerable higher price. Because of the intensity of farming, the per acre production was comparable or exceeded that of corporate farming with pesticides The vegetables were more perishable and also more attractive and flavorful than fresh vegetables available at the typical markets. The "heirloom" vegetables were also seasonal. There was a considerable wastage in produce that was flawed in appearance for market or returned unsold from farmers markets and this was used by the farmer and employees or given away locally and was in an amount that most ended up as compost.

One issue I had with the tenant was that he was by contract required to get the farm certified and maintain certification by the California Certified Organic Farmers Association and never did.

http://www.ccof.org/

Yet during part of his tenancy he was an officer in the North Coast Growers Association. Some of the farmers at this site and another farm owned by my family were founding members of NCGA.

http://humfarm.org/

It wouldn't be such a huge issue IF mucifer Oct 2015 #1
then again pasture/grass fed beef is less intensive ag than growing grain, even for humans. Kali Oct 2015 #4
If all the humans ate the same amount of cows they are eating now mucifer Oct 2015 #5
perhaps true, but its not always so simple Travis_0004 Oct 2015 #12
yields aren't the full measure of the impacts of various methods Kali Oct 2015 #2
Yes! hunter Oct 2015 #16
We already grow more food than is ever eaten. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3
Mostly grain for cows and livestock... JCMach1 Oct 2015 #9
It's odd to see this as a response to information that shows organic's inefficiency. HuckleB Oct 2015 #19
I may be a bit off topic here but I believe what is more important is food that is wasted tencats Oct 2015 #6
We have more than enough acreage to feed Americans XemaSab Oct 2015 #7
Symptom katsy Oct 2015 #8
Organic can only be sustainable if we are talking vegetables JCMach1 Oct 2015 #10
Well, if there seems to be one organic crop that doesn't have this problem NuclearDem Oct 2015 #11
This is a rebuttal. Igel Oct 2015 #13
Irrelevant! What about the NUTRITIONAL yield? Peace Patriot Oct 2015 #14
Do the stats LWolf Oct 2015 #15
We throw away massive amounts of produce Marrah_G Oct 2015 #17
Recommended. Considering that organic farming would also be on the wrong side of... HuckleB Oct 2015 #18
At some point we are just going to have to eat algae and yeast. yellowcanine Oct 2015 #20
And crickets. progressoid Oct 2015 #23
I prefer my crickets roasted..... yellowcanine Oct 2015 #25
Organic farming is 00.6% of US farming so it's hard to see what "big implications" GreatGazoo Oct 2015 #21
I'd like to see a similar analysis done by someone who isn't a big ag shill. Gormy Cuss Oct 2015 #22
"Organic" farming can fill an economic and food quality niche. PufPuf23 Oct 2015 #24
Lower yields but healthier food. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Lower Productivity Of...»Reply #24