Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We've maybe not seen it simplified like this: Comparing Car purchases and Gun Purchases [View all]Mira
(22,685 posts)3. I neither know about guns or cars,
not how many HP my Ford Ranger or my Ford Fiesta have. But I don't think either can do willful taking of lives the way assault rifles can.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We've maybe not seen it simplified like this: Comparing Car purchases and Gun Purchases [View all]
Mira
Oct 2015
OP
And mandate that no vehicle be capable of going faster than the national speed limit, of course.
Decoy of Fenris
Oct 2015
#2
And mandate that no vehicle be capable of going faster than the national speed limit, of course.
The CCC
Oct 2015
#26
A-yup. Lots of people willing to legislate when it won't affect them. n/t
Decoy of Fenris
Oct 2015
#59
Perfectly legal to speed at the drag strip. Plus there are instances, albeit rare ones, where
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#79
When has an assault rifle EVER *willfully* taken a life on its own?? Just ONE LINK where one of
Ghost in the Machine
Oct 2015
#17
Maybe you didn't read the exact wording that I responded to.. here they are...
Ghost in the Machine
Oct 2015
#86
I'll give up my 240HP **4 CYLINDER** built out Acura Integra when they pry my cold, dead hands
Ghost in the Machine
Oct 2015
#16
It's a gift... or a curse... I haven't decided yet, but sometimes these things just pop in my head
Ghost in the Machine
Oct 2015
#87
Actually I don't like 60s/70s cars. I like late 80s - early 2000s cars. And as a bonus, my 383
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#98
If no CC then I agree, but i think CC holders need some instruction. The 2 idiots....
Logical
Oct 2015
#117
Guns aren't the issue. We're waiting on the Gun Control side to catch on.
Decoy of Fenris
Oct 2015
#11
Posting a graphic in a discussion group usually results in discussion of said graphic
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#12
It would be cheap, not cover criminal acts (no insurance does), and probably provided by the NRA...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#39
people who cannot admit there is a problem, there's no point even talking to them
Skittles
Oct 2015
#23
This simplification has been seen countless times. It is not a valid comparison.
Snobblevitch
Oct 2015
#13
Pointing out that one can drive pretty much anywhere after getting a license, nor...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#14
Controllers forget that the NRA is a major insuror of gun owners, and would love the new business
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#40
"not once has a private citizen CC gun owner...stopped or even attempted to stop...a killer" Wrong:
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#44
The NRA is one of the largest, if not *the* largest, underwriters of gun insurance in the US...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#42
We should require all owners of guns to have insurance to cover any losses, whether due
JDPriestly
Oct 2015
#55
No insurance will pay for criminal acts, nor will it pay for the actions of third parties...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#56
That is why I point out that this "insurance" would be more of an indemnification fund
JDPriestly
Oct 2015
#57
You do realize that financial penalties to discourage exercising a enumerated right is a no-no...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#64
The insurance companies should be required to include all the risk of damages by guns
JDPriestly
Oct 2015
#62
"(In my view), all gun owners should pay to indemnify the losses of those hurt by guns."
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#66
Did you read? I said they weren't CREATED for that purpose. Oh boy. It just never stops.
C Moon
Oct 2015
#72
Your analogy implies anyone could own unregistered machine guns on private property; even felons
aikoaiko
Oct 2015
#33
There is no enumerated right to own cigarettes or alcohol. There *is* one to own guns
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#67
No, that's really just what lobbyists say is an enumerated right. Now, before you
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#82
I heard you out. I'll leave estimates of your mental health to others.
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#92
Or regulate gun manufacturers like the Repubs have regulated women's health care facilities
LonePirate
Oct 2015
#54
The taxpayers pay hundreds of billions to pay for the damage guns cause
ThoughtCriminal
Oct 2015
#70
Doesn't matter. You still propose financial penalties in order to limit an enumerated right
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#91
Do you really suppose that gun owners will merely sit on their hands while you gouge them?
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#95
Drivers don't vote at nearly the rate of gun owners, who turn out when motivated
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#115
With people with your mindset opposing them, they'll never have to...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#65
10 years ago: "gays lobbying for gay marriage instead of civil unions are going to make it
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#84
Change enough people's minds and vote enough progressives into office (and put enough judges on
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#99
And licenses are "shall-issue" if you pass the test and background check and pay the fee
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#94