Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LooseWilly

(4,477 posts)

13. Uhhmm, did you read your own title? How about- arson?

Reply to reACTIONary (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:43 PM

Jan 2016

n/t

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What exactly are the Oregon Arsonists guilty of? [View all] reACTIONary Jan 2016 OP

Apparently, the jury did not buy their defense jberryhill Jan 2016 #1

Unfortunately, news accounts are not .... reACTIONary Jan 2016 #3

Oregon has air quality laws and a low tolerance 4 idiots who abuse land roguevalley Jan 2016 #42

Thank you for posting this. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #2

This is the background ... sunnystarr Jan 2016 #8

$600,000 of taxpayer's money handmade34 Jan 2016 #4

I've read they did it to cover illegal poaching on federal grounds cali Jan 2016 #5

They intentionally set fire to federal property. cleanhippie Jan 2016 #6

K&R eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #7

It is the same thing I would be guilty of if I was burning my grass and it LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #9

Actually, they set the fires intentionally to cover up poaching on public land. OregonBlue Jan 2016 #11

It doesn't make that much different the act that they did to cover it up was arson on LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #12

Here's some history on the Hammonds... 2naSalit Jan 2016 #10

Uhhmm, did you read your own title? How about- arson? LooseWilly Jan 2016 #13

The point of my post us that.... reACTIONary Jan 2016 #22

Read more, get back to us. nt Logical Jan 2016 #14

The federal government has been entering "stewardship contracts" to restore PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #15

interesting hfojvt Jan 2016 #17

The "whiny babies" are obviously making excuses. PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #20

middle of nowhere? hfojvt Jan 2016 #25

I actually live where there are less people and services local PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #27

I was way off on the size hfojvt Jan 2016 #29

You are correct now. South Dakota is sparsely populated and so is eastern Oregon (and Montana). PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #31

A major claim of the militia is they believe they have a constitutional right to the land. PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #30

Thanks for the background information eom reACTIONary Jan 2016 #23

if you can start a 139 acre fire hfojvt Jan 2016 #16

You haven't spent much time in the west, have you? XemaSab Jan 2016 #18

Driving across the Colorado Rockies a few years back EL34x4 Jan 2016 #19

to some people hfojvt Jan 2016 #26

Nice try. Ohio is mid EAST. It is 2/3 of the way from the center of the country Ms. Toad Jan 2016 #43

I think it is insane too hfojvt Jan 2016 #44

Arson. (n/t) Iggo Jan 2016 #21

K and R. nt Quixote1818 Jan 2016 #24

Origionally,, poaching on the reserve larkrake Jan 2016 #28

Were they ever convicted of poaching? NobodyHere Jan 2016 #37

Does anybody besides me NobodyHere Jan 2016 #32

It doesn't sound right to me either. rtw Jan 2016 #33

Were they even convicted of poaching? NobodyHere Jan 2016 #34

Don't think so rtw Jan 2016 #36

the judge that gave the first reduced sentence was a wingnut who had no RIGHT to do so. JanMichael Jan 2016 #35

I'm not sure I'd equate rtw Jan 2016 #38

nit picking point. they are going and not playing cowfucking gunhumpers with the out of towners. nt JanMichael Jan 2016 #40

Well, the Bundy brothers are not out of towners rtw Jan 2016 #41

Nope. truebluegreen Jan 2016 #39