Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, if violence with guns has fallen so much and we should all be so proud about it... [View all]aikoaiko
(34,213 posts)12. Even if its true that we currently don't need guns for protection at all
it doesn't mean that won't change. Historically, we've seen crime rates go up and down. Gun laws that restrict or reduce accessibility to guns aren't easy to change because they are wrapped in culture wars.
Further more, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Which means, the people are allowed to keep and bear arms so that a militia can be drawn from the people if needed.
You asked, "Isn't there an argument to be made they aren't needed for protection based on the facts they like to spout about gun crime being down?
My answer is yes, but its not a very good one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, if violence with guns has fallen so much and we should all be so proud about it... [View all]
boston bean
Jan 2016
OP
There appears to be no reasoning with these extremists--like suggesting (to Linus) we take his
hlthe2b
Jan 2016
#4
Given the "gun grabbing" meme is such a myth, I think you can figure it out... unless
hlthe2b
Jan 2016
#17
Honestly, I'd be satisfied with U.K. style gun control, seems reasonable. n/t
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#23
Well, that's just not true, I'll agree with you there, but I certainly don't view my view as...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#25
According to the stats, you are more likely to be a victim of gun violence by possessing a gun...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#21
Yep - that is an interesting stat. It's right up there with the stat that those who own swimming
jonno99
Jan 2016
#30
Actually, you bring up a pertinent point, I wonder how many studies controlled for that...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#34
Let me know when law enforcement officers go unarmed - then I'll take your stat to heart. nt
jonno99
Jan 2016
#28
Not sure how that is relevant, they are usually, or I should say hopefully well trained in how...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#35
It is relevant in that law enforcement officers are most often the 2nd or 3rd party to arrive
jonno99
Jan 2016
#37
If fences keep trespassers out and trespassers stay out why do we need fences?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#10
Unless you put signs up saying you are armed and dangerous in your front yard...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#33
And maybe the cause of the drop in violence is more of the right people with guns
Lee-Lee
Jan 2016
#40