Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could this be the birth of Free Republic 2.0? [View all]
Squinch
(52,196 posts)196. Are you trying to censor conversation here?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
1224 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Of course they're similar -they both revile and work against the Dem nominee
Rose Siding
Jul 2016
#455
Well be sure you complain to Skinner about his moderation - while not complaining about
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#470
No friend of mine uses b--, c--, and t-- to describe any woman, much less the Dem nominee.
Hekate
Jul 2016
#485
What has been said about Hillary Clinton at that site that hasn't been said at Free Republic?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#604
Please read this Luminous Animal post. She's been banned for objecting to use of C*nt against women
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#616
I have always had a thing for Luminous Animal. Too many people I respect were on the other side.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#777
That's excellent of her, and good to see. I'll replace that image with one of the vile wretches
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#820
That's what I'm wondering ... I posted the question to the Computer Group but haven't gotten a reply
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#1209
Jackass Delusionals make Freepers look good by comparison, and we all know what
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#65
Some of the JPR discussions on the various lawsuits and the Clinton e-mail do not support your view
Gothmog
Jul 2016
#154
That site deserves to have the lid cracked open and sunlight shone upon them,
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#117
Shut down free speech? They are FREE to post their stupid shit and we are FREE to
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#143
They are actually one of the most censorious places I've ever seen, as they congratulate themselves
Squinch
Jul 2016
#153
Given you think asking someone to stop saying something is an attempt at censorship...
Violet_Crumble
Jul 2016
#400
The problem is that on that site people are not free to post what they want.
George II
Jul 2016
#530
Until recently they had an entire forum dedicated to trashing DU. I am thinking the
Squinch
Jul 2016
#158
It would be hypocritical to attack that site and not Free Republic.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#614
A comment like that on DU would have been removed and very likely the poster banned.
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#548
Looking at his posting history makes it clear he would never be a Trump voter.
Lord Magus
Jul 2016
#1151
+1. It seems some here are still grinding on with primary bullshit, just as Skinner asked us
silvershadow
Jul 2016
#507
Indeed, it would be nice if people would stop defending sites that attack our nominee
synergie
Jul 2016
#670
That might have something to do with your views, which per your posts do not seem
synergie
Jul 2016
#669
I have personally criticized Rahm on DU many times and promoted Garcia here when he ran
Person 2713
Jul 2016
#751
"Democrats" who vow to vote for Trump and who castigate anyone who might vote for the Democratic
Squinch
Jul 2016
#758
Thank you for the kind words, but I just can't believe they have the gall to say that
Squinch
Jul 2016
#921
We had a lot of RW Trolls here during the primaries. They can no longer post their Hillary Hate
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#559
Hmmm Squinch, it does look as if that poster is attempting to stop discussion
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#318
oh you could x-post from here to infinity between Jackass Delusionals and Freeperville
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#505
"no dissent allowed"? Have you read the home page in the last six months? It got so bad...
George II
Jul 2016
#531
probably are the ones ponying up $$'s to the old wretched con man owner Robinson
AntiBank
Jul 2016
#421
I never thoought I would find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy than FreeRepiublic
MohRokTah
Jul 2016
#61
I've had a troll account at FR for 15 years. Generally, the Freepers are more in
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#274
Well looking at today's posts it appears they believe guns are for killing cops
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#118
No, and they are as proud as nine-year-old boys at their ability to use sexist language.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#20
I think it's because it has become mostly unacceptable here, after years of arguments about it.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#30
It is really very tightly censored. No one is allowed to post anything that suggests
Squinch
Jul 2016
#95
wow. . . some serious projection going on there. all I did was observe that there are
niyad
Jul 2016
#181
Nor, did I see a Civil Rights or LGBT group ... But I'm not surprised.
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#206
Actually Skinner has the information and made comments more than once. I am not going to hunt the
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#783
I don't go over there often. Morbid curiosity only hits me rarely. But if it is there next time
Squinch
Jul 2016
#189
Exactly, and I also haven't seen any umbrage to Trump's rampant anti-semitism, but
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#284
Well, here is their first reaction to our posts. "We have 2 women admins...
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#418
Wow- they immediately go on about how Manny must be fucking the two female moderators?
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#674
Put me in mind of the Fox and Friends reel of sexist comments about Gretchen Carlson.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#745
And they credit the women for "how tidy" the site is? Embarrassed for those women who put up with
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#748
Just so bizarre that they can't help salivating over the two female mods as if that was a compliment
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#836
One begets the other. Allow women to be referenced in a vulgar misogynist manner,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#847
No such thing as respectful boundaries - the dudes there are convinced it's too authoritarian to be
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1048
The can respect the n word boundary. They are saying, like my rw family, they are allowed to be
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1058
They do pretend they might allow it too, and are losing members for that bullshit...
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1067
Same people spent 7 yrs tearing up Obama and Democrats. They will just do that for the next however
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1071
Hell yes they will. I spent 7 years virtually hiding out in the BOG and a year in the HRC group....
Hekate
Jul 2016
#1082
Because they think it means the boys like them. You remember high school, right? nt
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#1093
I think some people are so desperate for attention they'll put up with anything, it's sad to see.
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1104
I commented on how demeaning the men's attitudes toward the women mods are there....
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1047
The demeaning is happening over there. If they can't compliment a woman on a skill
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1170
Many women do go along with sexist patriarchal bullshit - is this news to you? What it has to do
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1169
Better yet, use your time standing up for the two mod women that are being subjugated.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1059
As I said, I hadnt been on the site, and going locked up computer, but saw the names
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#790
Ya. But we already knew it. And got hides calling it. Validation for our perception. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#818
Those name seem familiar and reading that Chaffetz was on point makes me sick.
hrmjustin
Jul 2016
#4
Ah, and there it is. The personal attack! The final resting place of the argument utterly lost.
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#225
"Helter skelter," only with political parties instead of races. Doesn't reflect well on those
Squinch
Jul 2016
#770
none so blind... Siding with the republicans to wish that Hillary had gotten indicted
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#22
Wow. That is f@cked up. If I didn't know better, I would have thought it was FR. YIKES.
AgadorSparticus
Jul 2016
#436
there is a thread on bill clinton and AIDS. they are already in freeper land
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#25
I looked at the site. Saw a lot of my du ignore list there. I voted for Sanders and will now
Person 2713
Jul 2016
#771
"...And the n-word isn't part of my vocabulary." This after the poster insisted on using the c-word
Squinch
Jul 2016
#309
Well, think of the two biggest racist trolls(thankfully shown the door), DU had here for years...
zappaman
Jul 2016
#76
Most of those people still post here. It's nice to realize that we are not nuts when we read their
Squinch
Jul 2016
#105
But what they post here and what they post there are worlds apart. Here, many of them troll.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#167
I haven't been to the site much yet, but I remember the DUer it's named for..
jack_krass
Jul 2016
#458
I actually don't remember him. I have heard he was great. What was he legend for?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#572
He was always kind, even in disagreement. I don't think he would have liked the way many are acting
PeaceNikki
Jul 2016
#594
Jackpine Radical was indeed a legend. A great poster and DU misses him everyday
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#574
It's relevant because them leaving is an important moment in the history of DU.
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#177
That's true. I think the new TOS has a lot to do with some of the worst leaving here. It isn't
Squinch
Jul 2016
#202
The new TOS has shut down most of the worst, most divisive, and toxic behavior here, thankfully.
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2016
#449
Why would you vote for someone you vehemently disagree with? Does nothing guide you beyond a "D"?
Gene Debs
Jul 2016
#624
Well, you said "No matter how much I disagree with a democrat, I'd still vote for that person", so I
Gene Debs
Jul 2016
#679
One can question the validity of "D" if there's that huge an issue with a progressive like Clinton.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#795
Make sure you let Skinner know about your problems with his moderation of HIS site.
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#134
Hey, I will always call out bigotry where it exists, denial of such things is toxic.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#160
I didn't see that. But they were banned, you say? It doesn't seem like that amounts to
Squinch
Jul 2016
#776
So stubborn about allowing sexism they claim they might find a context where ni**er is acceptable?
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#743
welcome to du. well, they can use it as a slur, and we can point out that they are
niyad
Jul 2016
#671
that, and many others that were originally titles of honour. patriarchy does that.
niyad
Jul 2016
#814
Yup, just a sad little blogspot with one "writer" dressed in a costume she probably
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#1126
You and me both, auntpurl. Astonished I was. The sloppy syntax, lazy spelling, gobbledygook grammar,
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#569
Yes ... I haven't spent much time there; but, yes ... quite amusing, they are.
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#223
Did you know that you are a consumer if you give money to the Sanders campaign
Gothmog
Jul 2016
#424
but that person was NOT an anti-Clinton partisan, despite their insistence Hillary was going to jail
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#200
Ooooh My. With that encyclopedic wealth of knowledge, I am sure she is a great asset to the site.
Hekate
Jul 2016
#495
I remember her "tick tock, tick tock, the indictment is coming" She just knew!
lunamagica
Jul 2016
#976
Good lord! These people are truly insane! Seriously, I am SO happy this site exists.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#1156
I saw a cockroach in my apartment the other day. Summer. Bought roach motels.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#1159
In a month or two, I predict an influx here of new posters who have a suspiciously good grasp
Squinch
Jul 2016
#1160
Absolutely. The caterpillars will crawl around and then turn into something else.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#1161
Here's one from Just Plain Republicans: "God Bless our loyal opposition (Republican Party)!"
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#195
they've taken as the gospel truth every single last crazy thing said about Clinton.
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#220
I agree, some of the things people are saying about HRC are just unfuckingbelievable.
Rex
Jul 2016
#226
they believe all the stuff from The Arkansas Project, Clinton Body Count, Vince Foster etc
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#230
At the end, before she left here, she was working very hard to be supportive and to be a uniter.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#229
she'll probably get herself banned there, that place is going to be Lord of the Flies
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#234
She's pushing back on nonsense over there. And of course some insinuate she's a Hillary Troll.
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#256
Respect here, too. But, also wonder why she's chosen to do battle with those flagrant fanatics.
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#642
He did debunk some stuff, though, like Guccifer, even though he didn't want to.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#272
Me either. And it's actually been nice that most of those names have been siphoned off from here.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#267
If you have something to say, you should say it. Otherwise, it's just childish.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#244
Now I know I would have noticed that if I had one. My apartment isn't that big that I would have
Squinch
Jul 2016
#277
Remember the jerky kid in high school who would say cryptic things and think they made him
Squinch
Jul 2016
#246
And ten hairs on his upper lip that he had been growing all through Sophomore year.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#263
I just read some feckless shitwit admitting to reading Gary Byrne's masturbatory
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#224
Guess what? They think Hillary killed Vince Foster and pimp the Clinton Body Count stuff
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#228
"Hillary killed Vince Foster" is not a constructive discussion of HRC's flaws
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#292
Yes, it will be interesting to see how they react to Bernie endorsing Hillary.
Meldread
Jul 2016
#299
Such a troll. And so obviously so. I was always puzzled by the support he got here.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#442
Every OP was divisive pot-stirring flamebait. Never said a bad word about Republicans
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#602
Read the Elizabeth Warren thread. Just sub in Bernie's name and you get the gist of
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#324
For some, their longevity is the measure of the success of their trollery. Some of them are
Squinch
Jul 2016
#578
Except most of us true Bernie supporters are not "easily manipulated."
WIProgressive88
Jul 2016
#620
No one is smearing BS supporters. They are discussing the posters at JPR, who are a fringe group.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#787
Fair enough, and I suppose I should have picked up on that. Apologies for misinterpreting your post.
WIProgressive88
Jul 2016
#850
This is the reality of it. And I hope the 85% and beyond of Sanders supporters are gonna
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#806
This was the "tell" and what separated them from sincere Sanders people:
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#659
JPR is run by an Ann Coulter-fucker. Or, let me be precise....a wannabe-fucker.
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#529
The question isn't whether they have the 1st Amendment right to say stupid shit
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2016
#368
I'll see your squillion, and raise you a brazilian for your spot-on assessment!
opiate69
Jul 2016
#431
No not hardly. As usual you conflate things that don't relate to each other
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#522
Nobody here is promoting or voting for that Facist Trump. Can't say the same about JPR.
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#453
You think DU is a hate site, and you stay here because that amuses you? How sad for you.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#355
Seeing you've got time to ask questions, maybe you could answer the one I asked you in this thread..
Violet_Crumble
Jul 2016
#363
The other thing I would say is, other than you check out the threads of folks trying
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#524
A-friggin'-men! Thanks for stating what should be obvious, but apparently isn't.
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#545
You could paint a barn with that brush pretty quick. Maybe you should patent it....
think
Jul 2016
#356
Cosmicone's post was entirely about DU. You responded by saying he/she had painted with too
Squinch
Jul 2016
#367
Yes. I am not understanding why you are insisting on using them. If you have something to say
Squinch
Jul 2016
#378
I'm sorry if this is too complicated for you. An insinuation is when one compares a thing to another
think
Jul 2016
#388
So here's the thing. We can continue with this conversation in which you say silly and cryptic
Squinch
Jul 2016
#396
context: the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea,
think
Jul 2016
#397
I explained that the OP was making an insinuation based on the context of this thread.
think
Jul 2016
#404
Please show me the question in the OP's statement. While you're at it look for the insinuations
think
Jul 2016
#408
The OP, the original post, asks "Could this be the birth of Free Republic 2.0?"
Squinch
Jul 2016
#411
The OP is the original post. Post 1. That's what an OP is. If you are talking about post 352,
Squinch
Jul 2016
#427
I am fully aware what a broad brush is. What part of cosmicone's post about DU were you talking
Squinch
Jul 2016
#398
yes, we support the democratic nominee, don't claim bill clinton has aids, dont support republicans
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#612
Did you see that one of the most aggressive ones just got PPRed in this thread?
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#542
"Notice in particular how very concerned they are with down-ticket races." [sarc]
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#996
How about the ones planning to get banned on DU but somehow never get around to it
Renew Deal
Jul 2016
#550
I think it's also important because we all knew all along that the VAST majority of DU's Bernie
Squinch
Jul 2016
#1078
Yes, I agree. And I will say again, 12 yrs on this site, there are a lot of people... not a few,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1080
"Bringing those haters to light allows us to be allies again" OMG I fervently hope so
Hekate
Jul 2016
#1086
I am all like.... Damn, too. Lol. I have only made it to this point in the thread.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#810
It's more than a little exhausting at this point. But somehow I get the feeling this discussion...
Hekate
Jul 2016
#894
I am thinking of people I can actually invite to this site now. What a thought. Rules, rule. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#895
Yes! It took the new TOS to make it finally, finally sink in that this is a site for Democrats.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#532
Well, yeah, except for the fact that none of what you are saying about DU is true. You are
Squinch
Jul 2016
#590
Ahhh, I gotta always +1 this. So good to see you. I have not seen you forever. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#812
Jackpine Radical was a great DUer, but that toxic, putrid wingnut hate site
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#557
Disagreement with you equals "bowing down and giving reverence." Disagreement with you
Squinch
Jul 2016
#600
He was always kind, even in disagreement. I don't think he would have liked the way many are acting
PeaceNikki
Jul 2016
#596
That's what's so insane. All this time they've been telling us that we are such bad progressives
Squinch
Jul 2016
#735
A good point has been made that they are using the name of a well respected DUer
hrmjustin
Jul 2016
#587
I agree. He & I interacted a LOT. Wisconsin Democrats are a tight-knit group
PeaceNikki
Jul 2016
#599
What do you believe is the genesis of misogyny, especially the misogyny at jpr?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#626
Both--the underlying emotion is fear in a most cases, if I felt like being kind
ismnotwasm
Jul 2016
#637
Some of the female posters there seem to endorse the sexist and misogynistic language.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#640
Hatred is always the enemy of reason. In fact it's the first thing to go out the proverbial window.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#647
Oh, Cosmicone, when will you stop bashing fellow progressives? If I may insert a note of sarcasm:
Betty Karlson
Jul 2016
#601
Regards, Third Way "I want to be allowed to call Hillary the c-word" Manny (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jul 2016
#652
I had the same experience, and it saddened me too with respect to a few posters there,
Squinch
Jul 2016
#720
The raison d'etre of that site is to lambaste one woman. No good can came out of it.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#690
So quoting people is somehow misrepresenting them? These are people have set up
Squinch
Jul 2016
#733
And the justification for their torture of him was a single post where he was disparaging
Squinch
Jul 2016
#714
Nasty and grossly homophobic. And it passed a jury back then. But as you point out, NEVER AGAIN!
George II
Jul 2016
#792
Most consistent argument. So, you are ok with murdering women and children? WTF. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1030
A lot of the posts here are talking about the problem with "lying down with dogs."
Squinch
Jul 2016
#800
I am not a member there, but if a site supports Democrats I have no problems with it. nt
MADem
Jul 2016
#801
Mahalo for this, rbr! It's a wonderul site supporting Democrats and our Democratic
Cha
Jul 2016
#832
Let's see. They are full of Trump love, GOP high-fiving, Fox News and 4chan, sexism, racism,
Squinch
Jul 2016
#716
Looks pretty prevalent to me. You've got a bit of a "lying down with dogs" problem.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#739
Mark me down as "not at all surprised" that they all turned out to be Trump supporters.
DanTex
Jul 2016
#759
I don't want my post hidden but if you want I will send you a link of what I discovered there.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#768
DSB, my friend, that site is toxic, and I would NEVER flee from DU to it...
Cooley Hurd
Jul 2016
#772
I agree. I sympathize with CH about his insistence on concentrating on defeating Trump.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#797
To a large extent you absolutely right. However, as you know, this was not a very pleasant primary,
still_one
Jul 2016
#796
+1! It's as if all effort to conceal who they really are has been abandoned. nt
BobbyDrake
Jul 2016
#774
My theory is that many of them were never "Democrats" but only here to do what they could....
George II
Jul 2016
#809
I know! It's baffling that there are so many other boards who are obsessed with us
Rhiannon12866
Jul 2016
#782
How many of those sites were created by former members to mock us and excoriate our nominee?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#786
I think that hits the nail on the head. This provides an opportunity to blow of steam.
still_one
Jul 2016
#798
I think you are absolutely right. And from the looks of this thread, we had a lot of
Squinch
Jul 2016
#804
If you google my screen name I am mentioned there and not in a flattering way.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#815
I have seen the Bible dismissed as a manual for living in an agrarian society...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1057
I had a top Moron dude come to my house because twice I spent a half hour arguing with the
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1061
As I said I don't interpret the Bible literally and those who use it as a cudgel do it a disservice.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1063
I do not either. I even have an argument for that, the bible asking it not be literally interpreted,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1070
Personally, I am all for the Lilith, first woman, cut out because she was independent,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1081
What fascinates me are the pompous patronizing I'm-the-smartest-guy-in-the-room
betsuni
Jul 2016
#883
Ah. A meme of someone else's recycled thoughts! Except your meme doesn't apply even a little
Squinch
Jul 2016
#923
N word bad, lecturing your community bad, antisemitism bad. C word, .... meh?
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#824
I did. First you say no to the word, and I thought cool. Then you proceeded to give reasons it was
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#828
Also there doesn't seem to be any mention of the Trump support, GOP fawning and
Squinch
Jul 2016
#830
You think we're all ignorant, socially maladjusted and low-information types anyway
cosmicone
Jul 2016
#837
For a guy who "never comes to DU" and "only rarely stops in at LBN," he sure is here a lot.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#931
Okay, you brought it up.....where are all those "anti-Semitic" threads and, as you put it....
George II
Jul 2016
#848
This reminds me what was done to Obama, what they Republicans declared immediately. Do NOT let
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1032
One of the most strident anti Democratic former DU posters lets the cat out of the bag
redstateblues
Jul 2016
#919
Yeah, that has to be that guy who was a Ross Perot voter. He admitted he never
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#971
So Rex, what do you want to talk about? Meh... I am good with them having their site.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#858
"many seem to think the End of the World is every other weekend" That is just sad. Lol. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#861
On the other hand, I am totally being non productive with my Saturday. I apologize to no one for it
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#859
Didn't work for me though I am thinking of sauteing the mushrooms I have, now that they
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#871
Funny, for being FR2.0 I don't remember seeing anyone there propagating a transphobic stereotype
LostOne4Ever
Jul 2016
#872
That would be a call out and get my post hidden, but I will link to the overall thread
LostOne4Ever
Jul 2016
#882
And that is a call out on the transgendered, how can they not understand that?????
marble falls
Jul 2016
#896
I am glad to hear that you will still vote Democratic for very important reasons, that has nothing
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1036
I think so too. A very joyful individual. I think that's a frequency Piners can't hear.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#955
I am finding it fascinating to find my suspicions about some people so thoroughly confirmed.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#946
Is that your rapier-like wit we are seeing? At least you've moved on from your "OMG" phase. Now THAT
Squinch
Jul 2016
#950
Yup, I didn't go beyond one Op with over a 100 rec names on a list. That was all I wanted to see.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1039
Validation. All those hides. Validation. Being kicked off the board... validation. I agree. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1037
Finally! I've gotten this whole thing to load, my phone wasn't cooperating earlier.
herding cats
Jul 2016
#965
A lot of the people are friends I have known many years. I can compartmentalize 2016 primary
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1040
Renegade members who set up a site to mock Hillary Clinton and the denizens of this board.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1015
Do you feel the same way when the denizens of our board mock free republic?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1020
I felt it was sexist too, but hey. A site that embrace vulgar misogynist slurs isn't going to be
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1042
I love the sites that automatically do not allow. That is respect. That is getting it. What is not
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1045
It starts there. Another, They have considered it, and aware and know just what they are doing.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1068
Are you suggesting the proprietor is aware of the fact they are funding it?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1154
absolutely. Maybe we could try for a guinness book of world records, or have a guinness beer for
still_one
Jul 2016
#1124
We heard this crap from Nader and got Citizens United and the gutting of the Voting Rights Act
Gothmog
Jul 2016
#1142
I never read FR, but yesterday when I saw this I thought I should take a look.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#1149