Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could this be the birth of Free Republic 2.0? [View all]
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)785. Actually personality is found to be genetically linked, and
whether a person is liberal or conservative, the 2 main types definitively identified last time I read about it, can often be surmised by viewing the brain on CT scan. Liberals and conservatives use different parts of the brain more. They also process information in different orders/"directions."
Enjoy checking this out. Lots of fascinating findings, with more, and more complex understandings, layers upon layers, developing all the time. Peoples in more challenging climates tend to have evolved somewhat more conservative, with notably large numbers of those in hotter climates, something that can be verified by looking at any political world map. (I've always been a big geography fan and enjoy its immense influence being rediscovered in multiple disciplines after a long period of eclipse.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
1224 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Of course they're similar -they both revile and work against the Dem nominee
Rose Siding
Jul 2016
#455
Well be sure you complain to Skinner about his moderation - while not complaining about
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#470
No friend of mine uses b--, c--, and t-- to describe any woman, much less the Dem nominee.
Hekate
Jul 2016
#485
What has been said about Hillary Clinton at that site that hasn't been said at Free Republic?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#604
Please read this Luminous Animal post. She's been banned for objecting to use of C*nt against women
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#616
I have always had a thing for Luminous Animal. Too many people I respect were on the other side.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#777
That's excellent of her, and good to see. I'll replace that image with one of the vile wretches
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#820
That's what I'm wondering ... I posted the question to the Computer Group but haven't gotten a reply
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#1209
Jackass Delusionals make Freepers look good by comparison, and we all know what
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#65
Some of the JPR discussions on the various lawsuits and the Clinton e-mail do not support your view
Gothmog
Jul 2016
#154
That site deserves to have the lid cracked open and sunlight shone upon them,
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#117
Shut down free speech? They are FREE to post their stupid shit and we are FREE to
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#143
They are actually one of the most censorious places I've ever seen, as they congratulate themselves
Squinch
Jul 2016
#153
Given you think asking someone to stop saying something is an attempt at censorship...
Violet_Crumble
Jul 2016
#400
The problem is that on that site people are not free to post what they want.
George II
Jul 2016
#530
Until recently they had an entire forum dedicated to trashing DU. I am thinking the
Squinch
Jul 2016
#158
It would be hypocritical to attack that site and not Free Republic.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#614
A comment like that on DU would have been removed and very likely the poster banned.
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#548
Looking at his posting history makes it clear he would never be a Trump voter.
Lord Magus
Jul 2016
#1151
+1. It seems some here are still grinding on with primary bullshit, just as Skinner asked us
silvershadow
Jul 2016
#507
Indeed, it would be nice if people would stop defending sites that attack our nominee
synergie
Jul 2016
#670
That might have something to do with your views, which per your posts do not seem
synergie
Jul 2016
#669
I have personally criticized Rahm on DU many times and promoted Garcia here when he ran
Person 2713
Jul 2016
#751
"Democrats" who vow to vote for Trump and who castigate anyone who might vote for the Democratic
Squinch
Jul 2016
#758
Thank you for the kind words, but I just can't believe they have the gall to say that
Squinch
Jul 2016
#921
We had a lot of RW Trolls here during the primaries. They can no longer post their Hillary Hate
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#559
Hmmm Squinch, it does look as if that poster is attempting to stop discussion
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#318
oh you could x-post from here to infinity between Jackass Delusionals and Freeperville
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#505
"no dissent allowed"? Have you read the home page in the last six months? It got so bad...
George II
Jul 2016
#531
probably are the ones ponying up $$'s to the old wretched con man owner Robinson
AntiBank
Jul 2016
#421
I never thoought I would find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy than FreeRepiublic
MohRokTah
Jul 2016
#61
I've had a troll account at FR for 15 years. Generally, the Freepers are more in
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#274
Well looking at today's posts it appears they believe guns are for killing cops
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#118
No, and they are as proud as nine-year-old boys at their ability to use sexist language.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#20
I think it's because it has become mostly unacceptable here, after years of arguments about it.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#30
It is really very tightly censored. No one is allowed to post anything that suggests
Squinch
Jul 2016
#95
wow. . . some serious projection going on there. all I did was observe that there are
niyad
Jul 2016
#181
Nor, did I see a Civil Rights or LGBT group ... But I'm not surprised.
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#206
Actually Skinner has the information and made comments more than once. I am not going to hunt the
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#783
I don't go over there often. Morbid curiosity only hits me rarely. But if it is there next time
Squinch
Jul 2016
#189
Exactly, and I also haven't seen any umbrage to Trump's rampant anti-semitism, but
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#284
Well, here is their first reaction to our posts. "We have 2 women admins...
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#418
Wow- they immediately go on about how Manny must be fucking the two female moderators?
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#674
Put me in mind of the Fox and Friends reel of sexist comments about Gretchen Carlson.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#745
And they credit the women for "how tidy" the site is? Embarrassed for those women who put up with
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#748
Just so bizarre that they can't help salivating over the two female mods as if that was a compliment
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#836
One begets the other. Allow women to be referenced in a vulgar misogynist manner,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#847
No such thing as respectful boundaries - the dudes there are convinced it's too authoritarian to be
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1048
The can respect the n word boundary. They are saying, like my rw family, they are allowed to be
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1058
They do pretend they might allow it too, and are losing members for that bullshit...
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1067
Same people spent 7 yrs tearing up Obama and Democrats. They will just do that for the next however
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1071
Hell yes they will. I spent 7 years virtually hiding out in the BOG and a year in the HRC group....
Hekate
Jul 2016
#1082
Because they think it means the boys like them. You remember high school, right? nt
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#1093
I think some people are so desperate for attention they'll put up with anything, it's sad to see.
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1104
I commented on how demeaning the men's attitudes toward the women mods are there....
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1047
The demeaning is happening over there. If they can't compliment a woman on a skill
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1170
Many women do go along with sexist patriarchal bullshit - is this news to you? What it has to do
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#1169
Better yet, use your time standing up for the two mod women that are being subjugated.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1059
As I said, I hadnt been on the site, and going locked up computer, but saw the names
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#790
Ya. But we already knew it. And got hides calling it. Validation for our perception. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#818
Those name seem familiar and reading that Chaffetz was on point makes me sick.
hrmjustin
Jul 2016
#4
Ah, and there it is. The personal attack! The final resting place of the argument utterly lost.
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#225
"Helter skelter," only with political parties instead of races. Doesn't reflect well on those
Squinch
Jul 2016
#770
none so blind... Siding with the republicans to wish that Hillary had gotten indicted
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#22
Wow. That is f@cked up. If I didn't know better, I would have thought it was FR. YIKES.
AgadorSparticus
Jul 2016
#436
there is a thread on bill clinton and AIDS. they are already in freeper land
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#25
I looked at the site. Saw a lot of my du ignore list there. I voted for Sanders and will now
Person 2713
Jul 2016
#771
"...And the n-word isn't part of my vocabulary." This after the poster insisted on using the c-word
Squinch
Jul 2016
#309
Well, think of the two biggest racist trolls(thankfully shown the door), DU had here for years...
zappaman
Jul 2016
#76
Most of those people still post here. It's nice to realize that we are not nuts when we read their
Squinch
Jul 2016
#105
But what they post here and what they post there are worlds apart. Here, many of them troll.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#167
I haven't been to the site much yet, but I remember the DUer it's named for..
jack_krass
Jul 2016
#458
I actually don't remember him. I have heard he was great. What was he legend for?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#572
He was always kind, even in disagreement. I don't think he would have liked the way many are acting
PeaceNikki
Jul 2016
#594
Jackpine Radical was indeed a legend. A great poster and DU misses him everyday
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#574
It's relevant because them leaving is an important moment in the history of DU.
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#177
That's true. I think the new TOS has a lot to do with some of the worst leaving here. It isn't
Squinch
Jul 2016
#202
The new TOS has shut down most of the worst, most divisive, and toxic behavior here, thankfully.
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2016
#449
Why would you vote for someone you vehemently disagree with? Does nothing guide you beyond a "D"?
Gene Debs
Jul 2016
#624
Well, you said "No matter how much I disagree with a democrat, I'd still vote for that person", so I
Gene Debs
Jul 2016
#679
One can question the validity of "D" if there's that huge an issue with a progressive like Clinton.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#795
Make sure you let Skinner know about your problems with his moderation of HIS site.
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#134
Hey, I will always call out bigotry where it exists, denial of such things is toxic.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#160
I didn't see that. But they were banned, you say? It doesn't seem like that amounts to
Squinch
Jul 2016
#776
So stubborn about allowing sexism they claim they might find a context where ni**er is acceptable?
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#743
welcome to du. well, they can use it as a slur, and we can point out that they are
niyad
Jul 2016
#671
that, and many others that were originally titles of honour. patriarchy does that.
niyad
Jul 2016
#814
Yup, just a sad little blogspot with one "writer" dressed in a costume she probably
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#1126
You and me both, auntpurl. Astonished I was. The sloppy syntax, lazy spelling, gobbledygook grammar,
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#569
Yes ... I haven't spent much time there; but, yes ... quite amusing, they are.
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#223
Did you know that you are a consumer if you give money to the Sanders campaign
Gothmog
Jul 2016
#424
but that person was NOT an anti-Clinton partisan, despite their insistence Hillary was going to jail
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#200
Ooooh My. With that encyclopedic wealth of knowledge, I am sure she is a great asset to the site.
Hekate
Jul 2016
#495
I remember her "tick tock, tick tock, the indictment is coming" She just knew!
lunamagica
Jul 2016
#976
Good lord! These people are truly insane! Seriously, I am SO happy this site exists.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#1156
I saw a cockroach in my apartment the other day. Summer. Bought roach motels.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#1159
In a month or two, I predict an influx here of new posters who have a suspiciously good grasp
Squinch
Jul 2016
#1160
Absolutely. The caterpillars will crawl around and then turn into something else.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#1161
Here's one from Just Plain Republicans: "God Bless our loyal opposition (Republican Party)!"
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#195
they've taken as the gospel truth every single last crazy thing said about Clinton.
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#220
I agree, some of the things people are saying about HRC are just unfuckingbelievable.
Rex
Jul 2016
#226
they believe all the stuff from The Arkansas Project, Clinton Body Count, Vince Foster etc
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#230
At the end, before she left here, she was working very hard to be supportive and to be a uniter.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#229
she'll probably get herself banned there, that place is going to be Lord of the Flies
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#234
She's pushing back on nonsense over there. And of course some insinuate she's a Hillary Troll.
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#256
Respect here, too. But, also wonder why she's chosen to do battle with those flagrant fanatics.
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#642
He did debunk some stuff, though, like Guccifer, even though he didn't want to.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#272
Me either. And it's actually been nice that most of those names have been siphoned off from here.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#267
If you have something to say, you should say it. Otherwise, it's just childish.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#244
Now I know I would have noticed that if I had one. My apartment isn't that big that I would have
Squinch
Jul 2016
#277
Remember the jerky kid in high school who would say cryptic things and think they made him
Squinch
Jul 2016
#246
And ten hairs on his upper lip that he had been growing all through Sophomore year.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#263
I just read some feckless shitwit admitting to reading Gary Byrne's masturbatory
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#224
Guess what? They think Hillary killed Vince Foster and pimp the Clinton Body Count stuff
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#228
"Hillary killed Vince Foster" is not a constructive discussion of HRC's flaws
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#292
Yes, it will be interesting to see how they react to Bernie endorsing Hillary.
Meldread
Jul 2016
#299
Such a troll. And so obviously so. I was always puzzled by the support he got here.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#442
Every OP was divisive pot-stirring flamebait. Never said a bad word about Republicans
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#602
Read the Elizabeth Warren thread. Just sub in Bernie's name and you get the gist of
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#324
For some, their longevity is the measure of the success of their trollery. Some of them are
Squinch
Jul 2016
#578
Except most of us true Bernie supporters are not "easily manipulated."
WIProgressive88
Jul 2016
#620
No one is smearing BS supporters. They are discussing the posters at JPR, who are a fringe group.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#787
Fair enough, and I suppose I should have picked up on that. Apologies for misinterpreting your post.
WIProgressive88
Jul 2016
#850
This is the reality of it. And I hope the 85% and beyond of Sanders supporters are gonna
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#806
This was the "tell" and what separated them from sincere Sanders people:
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#659
JPR is run by an Ann Coulter-fucker. Or, let me be precise....a wannabe-fucker.
msanthrope
Jul 2016
#529
The question isn't whether they have the 1st Amendment right to say stupid shit
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2016
#368
I'll see your squillion, and raise you a brazilian for your spot-on assessment!
opiate69
Jul 2016
#431
No not hardly. As usual you conflate things that don't relate to each other
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#522
Nobody here is promoting or voting for that Facist Trump. Can't say the same about JPR.
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#453
You think DU is a hate site, and you stay here because that amuses you? How sad for you.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#355
Seeing you've got time to ask questions, maybe you could answer the one I asked you in this thread..
Violet_Crumble
Jul 2016
#363
The other thing I would say is, other than you check out the threads of folks trying
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#524
A-friggin'-men! Thanks for stating what should be obvious, but apparently isn't.
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#545
You could paint a barn with that brush pretty quick. Maybe you should patent it....
think
Jul 2016
#356
Cosmicone's post was entirely about DU. You responded by saying he/she had painted with too
Squinch
Jul 2016
#367
Yes. I am not understanding why you are insisting on using them. If you have something to say
Squinch
Jul 2016
#378
I'm sorry if this is too complicated for you. An insinuation is when one compares a thing to another
think
Jul 2016
#388
So here's the thing. We can continue with this conversation in which you say silly and cryptic
Squinch
Jul 2016
#396
context: the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea,
think
Jul 2016
#397
I explained that the OP was making an insinuation based on the context of this thread.
think
Jul 2016
#404
Please show me the question in the OP's statement. While you're at it look for the insinuations
think
Jul 2016
#408
The OP, the original post, asks "Could this be the birth of Free Republic 2.0?"
Squinch
Jul 2016
#411
The OP is the original post. Post 1. That's what an OP is. If you are talking about post 352,
Squinch
Jul 2016
#427
I am fully aware what a broad brush is. What part of cosmicone's post about DU were you talking
Squinch
Jul 2016
#398
yes, we support the democratic nominee, don't claim bill clinton has aids, dont support republicans
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#612
Did you see that one of the most aggressive ones just got PPRed in this thread?
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#542
"Notice in particular how very concerned they are with down-ticket races." [sarc]
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#996
How about the ones planning to get banned on DU but somehow never get around to it
Renew Deal
Jul 2016
#550
I think it's also important because we all knew all along that the VAST majority of DU's Bernie
Squinch
Jul 2016
#1078
Yes, I agree. And I will say again, 12 yrs on this site, there are a lot of people... not a few,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1080
"Bringing those haters to light allows us to be allies again" OMG I fervently hope so
Hekate
Jul 2016
#1086
I am all like.... Damn, too. Lol. I have only made it to this point in the thread.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#810
It's more than a little exhausting at this point. But somehow I get the feeling this discussion...
Hekate
Jul 2016
#894
I am thinking of people I can actually invite to this site now. What a thought. Rules, rule. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#895
Yes! It took the new TOS to make it finally, finally sink in that this is a site for Democrats.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#532
Well, yeah, except for the fact that none of what you are saying about DU is true. You are
Squinch
Jul 2016
#590
Ahhh, I gotta always +1 this. So good to see you. I have not seen you forever. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#812
Jackpine Radical was a great DUer, but that toxic, putrid wingnut hate site
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#557
Disagreement with you equals "bowing down and giving reverence." Disagreement with you
Squinch
Jul 2016
#600
He was always kind, even in disagreement. I don't think he would have liked the way many are acting
PeaceNikki
Jul 2016
#596
That's what's so insane. All this time they've been telling us that we are such bad progressives
Squinch
Jul 2016
#735
A good point has been made that they are using the name of a well respected DUer
hrmjustin
Jul 2016
#587
I agree. He & I interacted a LOT. Wisconsin Democrats are a tight-knit group
PeaceNikki
Jul 2016
#599
What do you believe is the genesis of misogyny, especially the misogyny at jpr?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#626
Both--the underlying emotion is fear in a most cases, if I felt like being kind
ismnotwasm
Jul 2016
#637
Some of the female posters there seem to endorse the sexist and misogynistic language.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#640
Hatred is always the enemy of reason. In fact it's the first thing to go out the proverbial window.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#647
Oh, Cosmicone, when will you stop bashing fellow progressives? If I may insert a note of sarcasm:
Betty Karlson
Jul 2016
#601
Regards, Third Way "I want to be allowed to call Hillary the c-word" Manny (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jul 2016
#652
I had the same experience, and it saddened me too with respect to a few posters there,
Squinch
Jul 2016
#720
The raison d'etre of that site is to lambaste one woman. No good can came out of it.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#690
So quoting people is somehow misrepresenting them? These are people have set up
Squinch
Jul 2016
#733
And the justification for their torture of him was a single post where he was disparaging
Squinch
Jul 2016
#714
Nasty and grossly homophobic. And it passed a jury back then. But as you point out, NEVER AGAIN!
George II
Jul 2016
#792
Most consistent argument. So, you are ok with murdering women and children? WTF. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1030
A lot of the posts here are talking about the problem with "lying down with dogs."
Squinch
Jul 2016
#800
I am not a member there, but if a site supports Democrats I have no problems with it. nt
MADem
Jul 2016
#801
Mahalo for this, rbr! It's a wonderul site supporting Democrats and our Democratic
Cha
Jul 2016
#832
Let's see. They are full of Trump love, GOP high-fiving, Fox News and 4chan, sexism, racism,
Squinch
Jul 2016
#716
Looks pretty prevalent to me. You've got a bit of a "lying down with dogs" problem.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#739
Mark me down as "not at all surprised" that they all turned out to be Trump supporters.
DanTex
Jul 2016
#759
I don't want my post hidden but if you want I will send you a link of what I discovered there.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#768
DSB, my friend, that site is toxic, and I would NEVER flee from DU to it...
Cooley Hurd
Jul 2016
#772
I agree. I sympathize with CH about his insistence on concentrating on defeating Trump.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#797
To a large extent you absolutely right. However, as you know, this was not a very pleasant primary,
still_one
Jul 2016
#796
+1! It's as if all effort to conceal who they really are has been abandoned. nt
BobbyDrake
Jul 2016
#774
My theory is that many of them were never "Democrats" but only here to do what they could....
George II
Jul 2016
#809
I know! It's baffling that there are so many other boards who are obsessed with us
Rhiannon12866
Jul 2016
#782
How many of those sites were created by former members to mock us and excoriate our nominee?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#786
I think that hits the nail on the head. This provides an opportunity to blow of steam.
still_one
Jul 2016
#798
I think you are absolutely right. And from the looks of this thread, we had a lot of
Squinch
Jul 2016
#804
If you google my screen name I am mentioned there and not in a flattering way.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#815
I have seen the Bible dismissed as a manual for living in an agrarian society...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1057
I had a top Moron dude come to my house because twice I spent a half hour arguing with the
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1061
As I said I don't interpret the Bible literally and those who use it as a cudgel do it a disservice.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1063
I do not either. I even have an argument for that, the bible asking it not be literally interpreted,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1070
Personally, I am all for the Lilith, first woman, cut out because she was independent,
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1081
What fascinates me are the pompous patronizing I'm-the-smartest-guy-in-the-room
betsuni
Jul 2016
#883
Ah. A meme of someone else's recycled thoughts! Except your meme doesn't apply even a little
Squinch
Jul 2016
#923
N word bad, lecturing your community bad, antisemitism bad. C word, .... meh?
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#824
I did. First you say no to the word, and I thought cool. Then you proceeded to give reasons it was
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#828
Also there doesn't seem to be any mention of the Trump support, GOP fawning and
Squinch
Jul 2016
#830
You think we're all ignorant, socially maladjusted and low-information types anyway
cosmicone
Jul 2016
#837
For a guy who "never comes to DU" and "only rarely stops in at LBN," he sure is here a lot.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#931
Okay, you brought it up.....where are all those "anti-Semitic" threads and, as you put it....
George II
Jul 2016
#848
This reminds me what was done to Obama, what they Republicans declared immediately. Do NOT let
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1032
One of the most strident anti Democratic former DU posters lets the cat out of the bag
redstateblues
Jul 2016
#919
Yeah, that has to be that guy who was a Ross Perot voter. He admitted he never
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#971
So Rex, what do you want to talk about? Meh... I am good with them having their site.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#858
"many seem to think the End of the World is every other weekend" That is just sad. Lol. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#861
On the other hand, I am totally being non productive with my Saturday. I apologize to no one for it
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#859
Didn't work for me though I am thinking of sauteing the mushrooms I have, now that they
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#871
Funny, for being FR2.0 I don't remember seeing anyone there propagating a transphobic stereotype
LostOne4Ever
Jul 2016
#872
That would be a call out and get my post hidden, but I will link to the overall thread
LostOne4Ever
Jul 2016
#882
And that is a call out on the transgendered, how can they not understand that?????
marble falls
Jul 2016
#896
I am glad to hear that you will still vote Democratic for very important reasons, that has nothing
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1036
I think so too. A very joyful individual. I think that's a frequency Piners can't hear.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#955
I am finding it fascinating to find my suspicions about some people so thoroughly confirmed.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#946
Is that your rapier-like wit we are seeing? At least you've moved on from your "OMG" phase. Now THAT
Squinch
Jul 2016
#950
Yup, I didn't go beyond one Op with over a 100 rec names on a list. That was all I wanted to see.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1039
Validation. All those hides. Validation. Being kicked off the board... validation. I agree. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1037
Finally! I've gotten this whole thing to load, my phone wasn't cooperating earlier.
herding cats
Jul 2016
#965
A lot of the people are friends I have known many years. I can compartmentalize 2016 primary
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1040
Renegade members who set up a site to mock Hillary Clinton and the denizens of this board.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1015
Do you feel the same way when the denizens of our board mock free republic?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1020
I felt it was sexist too, but hey. A site that embrace vulgar misogynist slurs isn't going to be
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1042
I love the sites that automatically do not allow. That is respect. That is getting it. What is not
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1045
It starts there. Another, They have considered it, and aware and know just what they are doing.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1068
Are you suggesting the proprietor is aware of the fact they are funding it?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2016
#1154
absolutely. Maybe we could try for a guinness book of world records, or have a guinness beer for
still_one
Jul 2016
#1124
We heard this crap from Nader and got Citizens United and the gutting of the Voting Rights Act
Gothmog
Jul 2016
#1142
I never read FR, but yesterday when I saw this I thought I should take a look.
betsuni
Jul 2016
#1149