Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Curious about your thoughts [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)39. I personally believe Clintons position is more strong. She addressed the unlevel playing field those
oppressed have to navigate, while Sanders plans ignored the unlevel playing field, showing us how his policies would not be better for economic equality that Clinton's policies. That is actuality, Clinton's economic plans were more progressive.
So, I disagree that conversation has not been had and that HRC people are not concerned with economic inequality.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who got the vote first? Who got the Presidency first. Privilege of white as we walk in the world. Nt
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#13
"Which will influence the current election cycle more" is an entirely different question from
Squinch
Jul 2016
#23
Racism is overt, sexism not as much, but prevelant. A dead black man is pretty profound.
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#5
And yet it is structured so that the responder must pick a "winner." Perhaps the problem is
Squinch
Jul 2016
#25
I believe that if you are one you are likely to not believe in other forms of equality..
chknltl
Jul 2016
#26