Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

treestar

(82,383 posts)

44. All of those involve dumb people

Reply to mythology (Reply #32)

Thu Jul 28, 2016, 04:39 PM

Jul 2016

and the persons questioned were not arrested, etc. Also no government direct spying was involved as in the cartoon. It was some person dumb enough to be afraid by what they saw/heard. They were let go when the explanation became clear. It does not involve government misdeeds at all, which is the point of the cartoon, which apparently implies the NSA is listening and will haul people in for things that have nothing to do with terrorism whatsoever.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does this comic strip cross the line? Were the syndicate editors right to refuse to run it? [View all] FrodosPet Jul 2016 OP

No and no. CBGLuthier Jul 2016 #1

Same here. No and no. Scuba Jul 2016 #2

Calling Agent Mike Mendocino Jul 2016 #3

Cross what line? Iggo Jul 2016 #4

Supposedly, he was not allowed to run this cartoon in the newspapers FrodosPet Jul 2016 #22

No and no MrScorpio Jul 2016 #5

So that's why yesterday's Pearls was a rerun? Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2016 #6

maybe they refused to run it because it is so stupid? treestar Jul 2016 #7

You're right. Chiyo-chichi Jul 2016 #15

Kids would not be arrested for correcting grammar treestar Jul 2016 #18

Is not exaggeration one of the tools of Horatian satire? LanternWaste Jul 2016 #20

It would have to be mild enough treestar Jul 2016 #21

The pigs are kids? rusty fender Jul 2016 #30

anthropomorphized treestar Jul 2016 #43

wtf melman Jul 2016 #39

Let's see mythology Jul 2016 #32

Thank you for the truth. JEB Jul 2016 #33

Some folks never have a bad word for our government. Rex Jul 2016 #36

Not mention the guy in Ohio who got the 'SWAT' treatment for... Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2016 #40

All of those involve dumb people treestar Jul 2016 #44

Rah rah rah USA USA USA! Rex Jul 2016 #46

Irrelevant response. treestar Jul 2016 #47

Yes your very first response in this thread was irrelevant. Rex Jul 2016 #48

This message was self-deleted by its author Rex Jul 2016 #35

Now that's some well-crafted humor right there. BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #8

No to both questions. DawgHouse Jul 2016 #9

Oh good god Hissyspit Jul 2016 #10

No, no. GeorgeGist Jul 2016 #11

Fairly typical of Pearls Maeve Jul 2016 #12

Exactly. But maybe he did push it a little too far considering leftyladyfrommo Jul 2016 #14

Gone "too far" where? jberryhill Jul 2016 #16

push what too far? Dyedinthewoolliberal Jul 2016 #29

No, THIS is too far. Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2016 #42

No. n/t demmiblue Jul 2016 #13

No and no. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #17

Censorship FrodosPet Jul 2016 #25

I don't understand your point. nt LAS14 Jul 2016 #19

It seems he was not allowed to run it in the newspapers (there are newspapers left?) FrodosPet Jul 2016 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author BigDemVoter Jul 2016 #24

No. No. ghostsinthemachine Jul 2016 #26

I think it is the close resemblance of the NSA guy to 911liani rurallib Jul 2016 #27

No and no (nt) matt819 Jul 2016 #28

No and No rusty fender Jul 2016 #31

Ditto. RebelOne Jul 2016 #34

how the fuck does it "cross the line"? I can't believe anyone didn't run it. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #37

That is funny, the fact they didn't run it is pathetic. Rex Jul 2016 #38

WE NEED TO WATCH WHAT WE SAY Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #41

Well you know how important it is for the media to protect Big Brother. Rex Jul 2016 #45