Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
14. non medical liability
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 11:15 AM
Sep 2016

Forget the fact they're cops for a second.

This has happened, a good samaritan trying to render aid at a traffic accident scene to stop a victims bleeding, but the victim still lost the limb. The victim sued the good samaritan because they held no health care certification or license and applied the tourniquet incorrectly, too long etc. Good samaritan loses his shirt in the lawsuit.

California’s Supreme Court has ruled that “the state’s ‘Good Samaritan’ law providing tort immunity for rescuers applies only to medical personnel providing medical help

http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/12/can-good-samaritans-be-sued-for.html


Kind of like this ruling, I don't know what Oklahoma law requires, but these types of laws don't help. Now if the cops didn't call medical as a shooting victim bleeds out then they're just murderers watching his lifeblood run down the road.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's with this police p...»Reply #14