Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Qutzupalotl

(15,827 posts)

4. Enough for two states but not the third

Reply to NCTraveler (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 05:07 PM

Nov 2016

yet. She is likely to hit her estimate for all three races soon. Whether a recount or audit will happen is not up to her once she files (it has to be approved) but that will keep her end of the bargain.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dueling conspiracy theories. [View all] HassleCat Nov 2016 OP

She has enough money for the count. NCTraveler Nov 2016 #1

Enough for two states but not the third Qutzupalotl Nov 2016 #4

I disagree about only having enough for two states. NCTraveler Nov 2016 #5

WI will not get a money count until next week and I think will only count her votes.. CK_John Nov 2016 #2

Why would they only count her votes? That makes no sense. kcr Nov 2016 #7

Also, 1 will be off the table when these guys announce robbedvoter Nov 2016 #3

Either one could be true. Archae Nov 2016 #6