Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
8. Signing executive orders does not mean effective
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 04:43 PM
Jan 2017

Especially when the orders are (a) outside the president's legal capacity to act; and/or (b) unconstitutional.

When President Obama signed executive orders, they were carefully thought out and within the realm of his jurisdiction. (Though he was crossed by the courts on a couple.) His were also done because the majority Republican Congress refused to even take up any of his initiatives.

Trump, by contrast, has the majority, and yet he's signing orders--like "build a wall" or "take away federal funds from sanctuary cities" over which he has no fiscal or legal authority.

So no. Not effective ... yet. God help us if they are.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump is showing signs of...»Reply #8