Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
15. I watched the videos on CNN
Fri Apr 7, 2017, 11:02 AM
Apr 2017

from Russian sources. It appears they are plausibly taken at Shayrat AB.

Here is what I noted:
-runways intact, small catering this is what I would expect to see, runways are tough targets to seriously damage and Tomahawks are not a good choice.
-damage to several runway access points better target, it keeps the planes from getting to the runway. downside is the same as runways, without specialized weapons damage is light and easily repairable
-superficial damage to aircraft shelters again expected given weapon used. the shelters are designed to protect against such an attack and worked as advertised
-aircraft parked in open untouched in was difficult to tell from the drone video but is appeared they were older aircraft. while not prime targets, they could be used in attacks and as they were unprotected were freebies. I would have hit them

What I did not see on the video was any images of control, repair, refueling or weapon storage sites. Unsurprising that this footage is not shown as that is where the real damage can be done and would help determine how long the base may be at reduced capability.

Overall I wold say this was a symbolic strike, not an effort to inhibit Syria's ability to use chemical weapons except via a potential threat of future strikes.

CNN on line has some video. Extremely unimpressive. rzemanfl Apr 2017 #1
What was the original source of the video? n/t janx Apr 2017 #5
Apparently Russian and/or Syrian TV. n/t rzemanfl Apr 2017 #9
They would be interested in downplaying it, I think. janx Apr 2017 #18
How would we get video from Syria? n/t rzemanfl Apr 2017 #19
Return on Investment was a nice little distraction for Trump. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #2
That's a very good question. Unless the $84 million worth of high tech flash-bang caused real... WoonTars Apr 2017 #3
I have heard the runways are intact exboyfil Apr 2017 #7
The whole 'advanced warning' thing kind of gave it away... WoonTars Apr 2017 #8
Unless 50 jets were destroyed, it was worthless HAB911 Apr 2017 #4
Russia was given prior warning, so Assad would have been informed. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2017 #6
possibly as many as 6 were destroyed lapfog_1 Apr 2017 #12
I saw the number 6 on some international news womanofthehills Apr 2017 #16
Probably any airbase has some partially dismantled aircraft JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2017 #20
+1000. Javaman Apr 2017 #14
Not much runway damage - a lot of debris on runway womanofthehills Apr 2017 #17
Didn't crater either runway from what I've read at foreign press main runway intact. onecaliberal Apr 2017 #10
RT Showed vids of 1. Main Runway intact, 2.) Aircraft still intact, 3.) Empty bunkers hit uponit7771 Apr 2017 #11
Whatever it is, we'll send $10 Billion over there to replace it. Of course, $7B will go missing. TheBlackAdder Apr 2017 #13
I watched the videos on CNN sarisataka Apr 2017 #15
I guess it wasn't too bad LeftInTX Apr 2017 #21
Is suspect minimal damage. That's why Russia never deployed interceptors. oasis Apr 2017 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has anyone seen or heard ...»Reply #15