Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

still_one

(98,883 posts)

5. Don't get me wrong, the repukes refused to give Garland a hearing. That and the

Reply to nkpolitics1212 (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 7, 2017, 09:00 PM

Apr 2017

investigation of trump and his cohorts in possible collusion should be grounds that he should not be allowed to nominate any lifetime appointments until that investigation is cleared up, and if it means not allowing any lifetime judicial appointments until the next President, I am all for that. Unfortunately, the republicans insured that won't be the case

That is why 2018 is critical to stop this in its tracks

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Supreme Court. [View all] nkpolitics1212 Apr 2017 OP

In fairness, while Roberts is conservative, he is not an idealouge like Alito, and Thomas still_one Apr 2017 #1

How would the Republicans field if Clarence Thomas were to be impeached? nkpolitics1212 Apr 2017 #2

After today, there is no filibuster option. So if any justice leaves before 2018, Trump will get Yo_Mama Apr 2017 #3

The filibuster is dead for Supreme Court nominees. Democrats wouldn't require... PoliticAverse Apr 2017 #4

Nor would Senate (D) abide by their moral dicta. Igel Apr 2017 #6

Don't get me wrong, the repukes refused to give Garland a hearing. That and the still_one Apr 2017 #5

Kennedy is socially somewhat moderate FBaggins Apr 2017 #7

this, Kennedy is still a republican Amishman Apr 2017 #8