Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Igel

(37,546 posts)

6. Nor would Senate (D) abide by their moral dicta.

Reply to PoliticAverse (Reply #4)

Fri Apr 7, 2017, 09:41 PM

Apr 2017

If they claim on moral grounds that the filibuster is proper when faced with Gorsuch, no matter if they have somebody as partisan.

The polarization is such that intentionally abrogating one's publicly stated values for partisanship and revenge is now deemed the moral high ground.

The (R) do it, so the (D) have to do it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Supreme Court. [View all] nkpolitics1212 Apr 2017 OP

In fairness, while Roberts is conservative, he is not an idealouge like Alito, and Thomas still_one Apr 2017 #1

How would the Republicans field if Clarence Thomas were to be impeached? nkpolitics1212 Apr 2017 #2

After today, there is no filibuster option. So if any justice leaves before 2018, Trump will get Yo_Mama Apr 2017 #3

The filibuster is dead for Supreme Court nominees. Democrats wouldn't require... PoliticAverse Apr 2017 #4

Nor would Senate (D) abide by their moral dicta. Igel Apr 2017 #6

Don't get me wrong, the repukes refused to give Garland a hearing. That and the still_one Apr 2017 #5

Kennedy is socially somewhat moderate FBaggins Apr 2017 #7

this, Kennedy is still a republican Amishman Apr 2017 #8