Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,208 posts)
9. There is no possible definition of imminent threat that applies to the doctor.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 10:13 AM
Apr 2017

Every single report I've seen says that he was behaving perfectly well till he was illegally man-handled by these airport thugs.

Also, the Dean of Cornell University explains why UA shares legal culpability here:

http://www.newsweek.com/why-united-were-legally-wrong-deplane-dr-dao-583535

Although this depends on the facts, news reports suggest that Dao was not upset, and was minding his own business until he was told that he was being involuntarily removed and he was dragged kicking and screaming from the aircraft.

SNIP

In contrast, the object and purpose of the contract of carriage is, among other things, to require the airline to transport the passenger from location A to location B aboard aircraft C. Being on the aircraft is the whole point of the contract, and it specifically lists the situations when the airline may deny transport to a ticketed customer.

Since the airline did not comply with those requirements, it should be liable for the damages associated with their breach.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chicago aviation security...»Reply #9