Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. You could be right.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 10:20 AM
Apr 2017

I would think that "imminent threat" could be expanded to include flying a plane with more passengers than legally allowed, which is the case since, with the addition of the 4 staff members, the plane was overloaded unless 4 passengers were removed.

At least I could see that kind of back-and-forth with a judge and jury.

But this is the only point I've seen so far that COULD be trouble for United. Everything else comes down to Dao purchased a ticket to get from one destination to another, he did not purchase a seat and plane-specific ticket.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)
[/center][/font][hr]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chicago aviation security...»Reply #10