Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(15,061 posts)
7. The government would probably suppress that information.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:19 PM
Jun 2017

Informing the people that the announced election results are not necessarily accurate would undermine our democracy. I don’t believe the government would be very quick to share such information with the people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nope. You break it; you buy it. NT mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2017 #1
If we had definitive proof they flipped the votes, the deplorables would Eliot Rosewater Jun 2017 #2
Also interesting would be what will we do to Russia...anything more appropriate than sanctions? jmg257 Jun 2017 #3
Then the rationale for Trump's Presidency... dchill Jun 2017 #4
That is when politics and plea bargain come into play delisen Jun 2017 #5
How are we going to plea bargain with the mouthbreathing idiots who'd start rioting and shooting? trentwestcott Jun 2017 #14
Most of them are as gutless as the John Birchers of yesteryear delisen Jun 2017 #15
Hey now, Hannity is a tough guy trentwestcott Jun 2017 #22
I Don't Get The Feeling That's Being Looked Into SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #6
The government would probably suppress that information. Jim__ Jun 2017 #7
Agreed. Even if they already know, they'll always deny it. crazylikafox Jun 2017 #8
I think you are right...unfortunately! Auntie Bush Jun 2017 #9
Yep, you are right. They would never disclose this even if there was irrefutable proof. Dream Girl Jun 2017 #13
Yes, they're more into protecting image of perfection than doing something about it. After Florida YCHDT Jun 2017 #21
I think it would depend on who has more control at the time. karadax Jun 2017 #10
I think that allowing someone to benefit from gaining the presidency by confirmed cheating and doing politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2017 #16
I agree seems to be DC and media consensus but after Florida 2000 who thinks we're perfect !?!?! YCHDT Jun 2017 #20
There's really no mechanism in place to deal with it. The obvious remedy would be a new election, Vinca Jun 2017 #11
Don't think anything would change. Maybe we'll stop meddling in other countries elections in future. Hoyt Jun 2017 #12
Not sure. But some of the experts on FL voting seemed Thrill Jun 2017 #17
Nothing would change even if there was clear and convincing evidence of enough fraud. aikoaiko Jun 2017 #18
Why couldn't we have a special election? bresue Jun 2017 #19
My guess... cab67 Jun 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question - what i...»Reply #7