General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Meet Bernie Sanders' 2018 challenger [View all]musette_sf
(10,208 posts)over some random anonymous dude's GoogleDoc junk that, shall we say, had zero provenance.
I find the first post linked to, to essentially state that although he does not personally agree, he defends the rights of gays to marry, and states a negative opinion on Kim Davis that I think most sane people at DU would also agree with. Rating: 5% fire, 95% smoke.
I find the third post linked to, refers to a specific, particularly odious and scummy hypocrite as the pejorative you cite. Not "black people". A very specific particularly odious and scummy hypocrite, who has behaved abhorrently in what I would consider a racist manner towards other African-Americans. Not wild about the descriptive term used, but DU was rife with criticism of that specific particularly odious and scummy hypocrite, and some posts here may even have used the same descriptive term. Rating: 5% fire, 95% smoke.
I find the second post linked to, to be problematic. Rating: 100% fire, all smoke is incidental to the fire.
From his posts and what I know about him otherwise, it looks to me like he's not terribly smart, has some views I do not agree with, and will probably be an insignificant challenger to Sen Sanders. Svitavsky's passion for helping the homeless is to be admired, but he's not Senatorial material.
Now see how easy that was? FACTS make everything better.