Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: With the destroyed power grid on the island of Puerto Rico... [View all]cbreezen
(694 posts)51. I note no mention of hydro-electric...
but, from the info you provide (I didn't go out to Wikipedia), that's just a drop in the bucket. Puerto Rico, clearly, has a manipulated energy scheme. In other words, they are being held in a sort of economic hostage situation.
Once again, I must ask the naysayers (not you, personally), how can this be changed other than through a collective grassroots effort?
I don't have answers, I'm just looking for them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am a Dr Who fan...as are many DUers...so a Tardis suggestion would have really been appropriate
Pachamama
Oct 2017
#6
I think you are hitting upon an even bigger concept that needs to be looked at...
Pachamama
Oct 2017
#5
Also wave energy should be explored. PR is in "the middle of an ocean...big water".
brush
Oct 2017
#33
Yes. It's wise to not rely on just one type of energy generation. Sort of like not putting all...
brush
Oct 2017
#40
I think that the massive debt and mismanagement of the power company there will scare away anyone
Lee-Lee
Oct 2017
#13
I'm guessing the people of Puerto Rico want the electricity turned on.
JustABozoOnThisBus
Oct 2017
#23
It could be done but DT45 is more concerned with paying the "bonds holders" first or
CK_John
Oct 2017
#43