Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(40,823 posts)
78. Great info for the thread
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 10:39 PM
Jan 2015

Very interesting!

I think the US must be on the way to giving up Guantanamo. I heard those that live there are aware change is coming. However, the US may try to get some concessions to have a continuing presence there. We shall see.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's unfortunate - I don't see any scenario in which the US gives back Guantanamo Bay George II Jan 2015 #1
Isn't it only leased atm anyway? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2015 #2
It is leased. Cuba can break the lease, if it chooses to. Mika Jan 2015 #6
The lease was written so both parties have to agree to break it. EX500rider Jan 2015 #10
Care to show us the exact language that states that? Thanks. Mika Jan 2015 #15
Article I EX500rider Jan 2015 #17
And how does this prevent Cuba from terminating the lease? Mika Jan 2015 #20
As written as long as the US makes payments it is in effect. EX500rider Jan 2015 #21
Except that a lease may be terminated by the lessor. Mika Jan 2015 #25
"Except that a lease may be terminated by the lessor." if stipulated in the lease.. EX500rider Jan 2015 #43
Spoken like a true imperialist or a false historian. JackRiddler Jan 2015 #59
He's referring to the "gov't" that Teddy Roosevelt & his roughriders put in power. Mika Jan 2015 #73
If the US was "Imperlists" in 1903 Cuba would have been a US state after we.. EX500rider Jan 2015 #84
If your position was true, Castro did that in 1959 happyslug Jan 2015 #75
The lease doesn't say they have to cash the checks. EX500rider Jan 2015 #88
Cuba is certainly violating Article IV. former9thward Jan 2015 #93
The US is committing the same violation. Mika Jan 2015 #108
If they could break the lease by themselves, they would have decades ago Reter Jan 2015 #53
Yeah, they should just post an eviction notice on the door Orangepeel Jan 2015 #99
It is leased, until "no longer necessary", which isn't very specific. We paid roughly $200 a year.. George II Jan 2015 #19
True bullying at its finest. It was accomplished in 1903 with the "Provisional President." Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #60
Great info for the thread flamingdem Jan 2015 #78
I lived in the US Virgin Islands and a normalization of relations with Cuba QuestionAlways Jan 2015 #47
... or give up the Panama Canal, or turn its back on the Shah of Iran or turn over Subic Bay........ marble falls Jan 2015 #61
The Panama Canal was subject to a 99 year lease.... happyslug Jan 2015 #116
Either this is a negociating ploy or the deal is off FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #3
Why not? The base was created in what has since been discredited, a war years ago. freshwest Jan 2015 #23
+1 If anything, I think closing Guantanamo will help us in the prestige dept. nt snappyturtle Jan 2015 #49
See #47 above QuestionAlways Jan 2015 #51
Sorry, for some reason I can't see #47. So that doesn't answer my question. Who posted it, or who freshwest Jan 2015 #58
Giving up Gitmo is as much a political decision as practical one FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #67
The US rapprochement is a one way street. The US way, or the highway. Mika Jan 2015 #74
Cuba has more to gain than the US FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #77
Cuba's position is the goal full normalization - as it always has. Mika Jan 2015 #82
The USA needs to give Guantanamo back flamingdem Jan 2015 #76
This whole public demand means Kerry/Obama probably have made an error FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #79
I support what they did but have always noticed how STUPID the USA is regarding Cuba flamingdem Jan 2015 #81
I think this is the way Guantanamo will be closed without congress. Thanks to President O. Sunlei Jan 2015 #121
Hoping like hell you are right! n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #132
I think we SHOULD turn Gitmo over to the Cubans.... Adrahil Jan 2015 #111
We should and would probably be wiling to behind closed doors over time FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #114
I think they have the right to ask for it to be returned. Also, it's not about national pride. freshwest Jan 2015 #115
That doesn't change reality. Adrahil Jan 2015 #123
Odd-- the same thing was said about simply opening better relations with Cuba, too. LanternWaste Jan 2015 #107
Shit's gettin real BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #4
Or we can wait a few years until both Castros are dead hack89 Jan 2015 #5
Love your staunch position and bravery. Mika Jan 2015 #7
The second generation of Chinese leaders embraced capitalism hack89 Jan 2015 #22
The average age of the Cuban National Assembly is 49 yrs old. Mika Jan 2015 #26
Time will tell. hack89 Jan 2015 #29
Cuba has always sought normalization. Mika Jan 2015 #30
Don't blame them hack89 Jan 2015 #35
Who cannot make unilateral demands? Mika Jan 2015 #37
The U.S. will not give up Gitmo without concessions hack89 Jan 2015 #39
Spot on. outside Jan 2015 #102
Cuba's per capita debt is 1/30th of the US's. Mika Jan 2015 #109
China embracing capitalism will be the death of the USofA. nm rhett o rick Jan 2015 #40
That has been American policy for 56 years. former9thward Jan 2015 #8
Cuba has a lot more to gain than we do. hack89 Jan 2015 #24
Let us know when the US becomes "self sufficient". Mika Jan 2015 #27
We can feed our population without imports. They can't hack89 Jan 2015 #32
Mission accomplished. That's what the US sanctions intended to do. Impoverish the people of Cuba. Mika Jan 2015 #36
Bringing Cuba into the global economy is paramount hack89 Jan 2015 #38
We are an imperialistic country. We will do what makes money for our Oligarch Rulers. rhett o rick Jan 2015 #46
I think its the opposite. Cuba doesn't have sweatshops making Nike shoes and Sony TVs. Mika Jan 2015 #50
And why do you think that is? nm rhett o rick Jan 2015 #52
Cubans overwhelmingly rejected it in the late 50's. Mika Jan 2015 #54
How do you get there? nm rhett o rick Jan 2015 #87
I buy a ticket and fly out of Ft Lauderdale airport. Mika Jan 2015 #112
My wife and I would like to visit someday. nm rhett o rick Jan 2015 #117
can also fly to cuba from canada/mexico no passport is needed. people do this all the time. Sunlei Jan 2015 #122
FYI, if you don't qualify under the new regs, it is still illegal for you to go. eom Mika Jan 2015 #124
Nope, they don't make much of anything, and the average wage Adrahil Jan 2015 #130
And you were there when? Mika Jan 2015 #131
Just do it. Owl Jan 2015 #9
To give back Gitmo, US would have to disinter and dispose of all their murder victims Demeter Jan 2015 #11
I don't see the US giving Guantanamo back any time soon, but the lifting of the embargo will hughee99 Jan 2015 #12
Oh yeah? DeSwiss Jan 2015 #64
You think Cuba will hold up normalized relations with one of the largest economies in the world hughee99 Jan 2015 #80
That's not ALL of what they said, nor I.... DeSwiss Jan 2015 #95
Did they mention the 6,000 American owned properties they seized? (and never paid for) EX500rider Jan 2015 #13
Did you mention compensation was offered decades ago and people in other countries, Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #14
The payment was to be made in Cuban bonds—an idea that was not taken seriously by the United States EX500rider Jan 2015 #16
The payments made by Cuba were accepted by all other non-US entities. Mika Jan 2015 #31
Sure: EX500rider Jan 2015 #41
Thanks for the op/ed link. Mika Jan 2015 #44
So U.S. owners, like the George H. W. Bush relatives decided the arrangements taken by others Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #45
They knew that the US long game plan was to impoverish Cuba. Of course they wanted cash. Mika Jan 2015 #56
That's accurate to the core. Glad you mentioned it. n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #66
Just 'cause Cuba makes a offer doesn't mean we have to take. EX500rider Jan 2015 #85
You seem to have forgotten US-supported monster Fulgencio Batista took the Cuban Treasury Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #55
"after everyone knows it offered compensation" EX500rider Jan 2015 #86
By the design of the country that refused payment. Mika Jan 2015 #110
Cuban bonds would be next to worthless anyway. EX500rider Jan 2015 #118
And exactly who where those 6,000 Americans that "owned" property in Cuba? rhett o rick Jan 2015 #48
The Treaty of Paris (1783) compensated the British property owners. former9thward Jan 2015 #94
Interesting thing about the 1%. When they gamble on stocks or derivitives or rhett o rick Jan 2015 #103
Interesting trivia fact about Cuban compensation. former9thward Jan 2015 #105
I don't think the USofA should use their bully powers to see that corporations like that rhett o rick Jan 2015 #106
Unless they brought it with them, nobody owns shit on this planet. DeSwiss Jan 2015 #65
Cool...so you don't own your house then? EX500rider Jan 2015 #83
''Tibi non potest accipies tecum'' DeSwiss Jan 2015 #96
Cuba might be better off negotiating for the US to turn atleast part of Guantanamo cstanleytech Jan 2015 #18
Negotiations will continue, much better a war of words than a.....war. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #28
A war? Cuba's ANNUAL military budget = less than 4 hours US military budget. Mika Jan 2015 #34
Makes sense though I mean why have a large military when you are on an island that doesnt really cstanleytech Jan 2015 #42
No Cuban neighbors are likely to invade Cuba? Really? Does "Bay of Pigs" Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #57
Yes and since that stupidity they have not tried and why should they? Cuba doesnt hold any real cstanleytech Jan 2015 #63
If the people who run the U.S. have no interests in invading Cuba, why did Pres. Dwight Eisenhower Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #69
You are talking from decades ago but I am talking currently and currently barring anything cstanleytech Jan 2015 #72
I guess you have forgotten about Cuban military intervention overseas. former9thward Jan 2015 #127
Shame on you for bringing up those pesky facts! Zorro Jan 2015 #129
Plan! libodem Jan 2015 #33
K&R DeSwiss Jan 2015 #62
Yeowwwwch! Looks dangerous! n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #70
It's like those Clearinghouse Sweepstakes letters...... DeSwiss Jan 2015 #97
Sad to see the defense of sociopath imperialists n/t JonLP24 Jan 2015 #68
Isn't it, though! Not so democratic. n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #71
So sad to see the defense of communists dictators too. EX500rider Jan 2015 #89
How do you feel about US - Saudi Arabia relations? JonLP24 Jan 2015 #90
I didn't defend any actions. EX500rider Jan 2015 #119
Jurisdiction is in Cuba. Mika Jan 2015 #125
Yeah but sociopathic imperialists are much, much worse. DeSwiss Jan 2015 #126
No when it comes to sociopaths the Stalin's and Mao's win the race by far. EX500rider Jan 2015 #128
Tough talk before the impending increased privatizations. joshcryer Jan 2015 #91
Time for Obama to pull back and let Raul and Fidel stew for a while Zorro Jan 2015 #92
Why? For having the audacity to ask us to give up our hub of villainy on their island? TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #98
Simple negotioation strategy Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2015 #100
Well, that's one way to close Guantanamo. no_hypocrisy Jan 2015 #101
The U.S. should accede to these demands, promptly. Paladin Jan 2015 #104
+ infinity Mika Jan 2015 #113
Thats what I have always suggested, give back Guantanamo, get out. That land belongs to Cuba. Sunlei Jan 2015 #120
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cuban President Raul Cast...»Reply #78