Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Cuban President Raul Castro: US Must Lift Embargo And Give Back Guantanamo To Normalize Relations [View all]flamingdem
(40,823 posts)78. Great info for the thread
Very interesting!
I think the US must be on the way to giving up Guantanamo. I heard those that live there are aware change is coming. However, the US may try to get some concessions to have a continuing presence there. We shall see.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cuban President Raul Castro: US Must Lift Embargo And Give Back Guantanamo To Normalize Relations [View all]
Judi Lynn
Jan 2015
OP
That's unfortunate - I don't see any scenario in which the US gives back Guantanamo Bay
George II
Jan 2015
#1
"Except that a lease may be terminated by the lessor." if stipulated in the lease..
EX500rider
Jan 2015
#43
He's referring to the "gov't" that Teddy Roosevelt & his roughriders put in power.
Mika
Jan 2015
#73
If the US was "Imperlists" in 1903 Cuba would have been a US state after we..
EX500rider
Jan 2015
#84
It is leased, until "no longer necessary", which isn't very specific. We paid roughly $200 a year..
George II
Jan 2015
#19
True bullying at its finest. It was accomplished in 1903 with the "Provisional President."
Judi Lynn
Jan 2015
#60
I lived in the US Virgin Islands and a normalization of relations with Cuba
QuestionAlways
Jan 2015
#47
... or give up the Panama Canal, or turn its back on the Shah of Iran or turn over Subic Bay........
marble falls
Jan 2015
#61
Why not? The base was created in what has since been discredited, a war years ago.
freshwest
Jan 2015
#23
+1 If anything, I think closing Guantanamo will help us in the prestige dept. nt
snappyturtle
Jan 2015
#49
Sorry, for some reason I can't see #47. So that doesn't answer my question. Who posted it, or who
freshwest
Jan 2015
#58
I support what they did but have always noticed how STUPID the USA is regarding Cuba
flamingdem
Jan 2015
#81
I think this is the way Guantanamo will be closed without congress. Thanks to President O.
Sunlei
Jan 2015
#121
I think they have the right to ask for it to be returned. Also, it's not about national pride.
freshwest
Jan 2015
#115
Odd-- the same thing was said about simply opening better relations with Cuba, too.
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#107
Mission accomplished. That's what the US sanctions intended to do. Impoverish the people of Cuba.
Mika
Jan 2015
#36
We are an imperialistic country. We will do what makes money for our Oligarch Rulers.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#46
I think its the opposite. Cuba doesn't have sweatshops making Nike shoes and Sony TVs.
Mika
Jan 2015
#50
can also fly to cuba from canada/mexico no passport is needed. people do this all the time.
Sunlei
Jan 2015
#122
FYI, if you don't qualify under the new regs, it is still illegal for you to go. eom
Mika
Jan 2015
#124
To give back Gitmo, US would have to disinter and dispose of all their murder victims
Demeter
Jan 2015
#11
I don't see the US giving Guantanamo back any time soon, but the lifting of the embargo will
hughee99
Jan 2015
#12
You think Cuba will hold up normalized relations with one of the largest economies in the world
hughee99
Jan 2015
#80
Did they mention the 6,000 American owned properties they seized? (and never paid for)
EX500rider
Jan 2015
#13
Did you mention compensation was offered decades ago and people in other countries,
Judi Lynn
Jan 2015
#14
The payment was to be made in Cuban bonds—an idea that was not taken seriously by the United States
EX500rider
Jan 2015
#16
So U.S. owners, like the George H. W. Bush relatives decided the arrangements taken by others
Judi Lynn
Jan 2015
#45
They knew that the US long game plan was to impoverish Cuba. Of course they wanted cash.
Mika
Jan 2015
#56
You seem to have forgotten US-supported monster Fulgencio Batista took the Cuban Treasury
Judi Lynn
Jan 2015
#55
And exactly who where those 6,000 Americans that "owned" property in Cuba?
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#48
Interesting thing about the 1%. When they gamble on stocks or derivitives or
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#103
I don't think the USofA should use their bully powers to see that corporations like that
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#106
Cuba might be better off negotiating for the US to turn atleast part of Guantanamo
cstanleytech
Jan 2015
#18
Makes sense though I mean why have a large military when you are on an island that doesnt really
cstanleytech
Jan 2015
#42
Yes and since that stupidity they have not tried and why should they? Cuba doesnt hold any real
cstanleytech
Jan 2015
#63
If the people who run the U.S. have no interests in invading Cuba, why did Pres. Dwight Eisenhower
Judi Lynn
Jan 2015
#69
You are talking from decades ago but I am talking currently and currently barring anything
cstanleytech
Jan 2015
#72
Why? For having the audacity to ask us to give up our hub of villainy on their island?
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#98