Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Russia shelled Ukrainians from within its own territory, says study [View all]
Source: Guardian
Tuesday 17 February 2015 09.00 EST
When Ukrainian forces came under withering attack in the east of the country last summer, soldiers were surprised as much as scared by the ferocity of the attack. The separatists they were up against had proven fierce and organised. But this was something else.
Now a group of British investigative journalists using digital detection techniques, satellite imagery and social media has provided near conclusive proof that the shelling came from across the border in Russia.
~more~
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/17/russia-shelled-ukrainians-from-within-its-own-territory-says-study
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
67 replies, 5372 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And of course the American government commissions it's own propaganda network cleverly disguised
Major Nikon
Feb 2015
#19
If you are speaking of ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN, then yesss. They would tell us there were WMD's
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#21
Your post is ridiculous, but I guess that's what you do when you have nothing.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#24
So RT is biased 'JUST LIKE' CNN, but I'm the one that has a bazaar way of looking at things
Major Nikon
Feb 2015
#55
I am not arguing whether Russia is better than the USofA, I am arguing against censorship on a
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#64
So you have nothing of substance to add except that Sesame Street is like the Hitler Youth?
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#45
If it was an attempt at sarcasm I think you failed. I didn't say that "RT is worthy of equal trust
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#47
Right.. it's from the Guardian so it can't possibly be accurate.. and this has nothing to do with
Cha
Feb 2015
#49
The Guardian has probably been by far the greatest source regarding this conflict
JonLP24
Feb 2015
#52
Same psych-ops group, same con game, same war mongering, same guillable targets.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#6
Exactly. This is not a "Study", which is the first thing that should make people realize this
newthinking
Feb 2015
#31
"falsely blaming chemical weapons attack on Assad" sorry the only parties guilty of falsehoods
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#7
"the evidence was soundly refuted and rejected" by no one with any credibility
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#11
Thinking war was a bad idea is not the same thing as thinking that the Assad regime was
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#15
The UN and Human Rights Watch reports have all established facts pointing the finger
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#28
People are ignorant that this is a continuation of PAX Americana and the International Republican
newthinking
Feb 2015
#32
He's saying that the ground markings on the Russian side were evidence of artillery use
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#13
Right.. according to the Usual Suspects.. Assad and Putin are blameless homophobic despots..
Cha
Feb 2015
#50
yeah, let's take Assad's word for it that the rebels used them even though they didn't have CW. LOL!
Bill USA
Feb 2015
#12
So the U.S. Military is incapable of also discovering this "truth"? Some journalists can?
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#5
"doing so could expose the secret intelligence operations involved in making such claims."
jakeXT
Feb 2015
#8
Coincidence is not evidence. Speculation is not fact. Wishes are not horses.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#35
VIDEO from the link, imagine being on the recieving end. Beautiful countryside:
freshwest
Feb 2015
#27