Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia shelled Ukrainians from within its own territory, says study [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)43. Yep, right on. nm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And of course the American government commissions it's own propaganda network cleverly disguised
Major Nikon
Feb 2015
#19
If you are speaking of ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN, then yesss. They would tell us there were WMD's
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#21
Your post is ridiculous, but I guess that's what you do when you have nothing.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#24
So RT is biased 'JUST LIKE' CNN, but I'm the one that has a bazaar way of looking at things
Major Nikon
Feb 2015
#55
I am not arguing whether Russia is better than the USofA, I am arguing against censorship on a
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#64
So you have nothing of substance to add except that Sesame Street is like the Hitler Youth?
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#45
If it was an attempt at sarcasm I think you failed. I didn't say that "RT is worthy of equal trust
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#47
Right.. it's from the Guardian so it can't possibly be accurate.. and this has nothing to do with
Cha
Feb 2015
#49
The Guardian has probably been by far the greatest source regarding this conflict
JonLP24
Feb 2015
#52
Same psych-ops group, same con game, same war mongering, same guillable targets.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#6
Exactly. This is not a "Study", which is the first thing that should make people realize this
newthinking
Feb 2015
#31
"falsely blaming chemical weapons attack on Assad" sorry the only parties guilty of falsehoods
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#7
"the evidence was soundly refuted and rejected" by no one with any credibility
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#11
Thinking war was a bad idea is not the same thing as thinking that the Assad regime was
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#15
The UN and Human Rights Watch reports have all established facts pointing the finger
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#28
People are ignorant that this is a continuation of PAX Americana and the International Republican
newthinking
Feb 2015
#32
He's saying that the ground markings on the Russian side were evidence of artillery use
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#13
Right.. according to the Usual Suspects.. Assad and Putin are blameless homophobic despots..
Cha
Feb 2015
#50
yeah, let's take Assad's word for it that the rebels used them even though they didn't have CW. LOL!
Bill USA
Feb 2015
#12
So the U.S. Military is incapable of also discovering this "truth"? Some journalists can?
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#5
"doing so could expose the secret intelligence operations involved in making such claims."
jakeXT
Feb 2015
#8
Coincidence is not evidence. Speculation is not fact. Wishes are not horses.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#35
VIDEO from the link, imagine being on the recieving end. Beautiful countryside:
freshwest
Feb 2015
#27