Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
If the shelling truly came from Russia sakabatou Feb 2015 #1
... uhnope Feb 2015 #67
It can't possibly be true. RT says no. Major Nikon Feb 2015 #2
And of course the American government never lies to it's people. rhett o rick Feb 2015 #18
And of course the American government commissions it's own propaganda network cleverly disguised Major Nikon Feb 2015 #19
If you are speaking of ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN, then yesss. They would tell us there were WMD's rhett o rick Feb 2015 #21
Well there you go, EXACTLY the same Major Nikon Feb 2015 #22
Your post is ridiculous, but I guess that's what you do when you have nothing. rhett o rick Feb 2015 #24
You stole my line! Major Nikon Feb 2015 #33
Ridiculous. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #65
Your post says it all and thereof is Cha Feb 2015 #48
The US actually does JonLP24 Feb 2015 #23
Some don't want to hear anything except goodness about our government. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #25
Project Censored - What is modern censorship? newthinking Feb 2015 #30
Yep, right on. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #43
You said it brother Major Nikon Feb 2015 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Feb 2015 #44
So RT is biased 'JUST LIKE' CNN, but I'm the one that has a bazaar way of looking at things Major Nikon Feb 2015 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Feb 2015 #59
"...I recognize that RT is biased just like CNN is." Major Nikon Feb 2015 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Feb 2015 #63
Next time try making more sense and you might have better luck Major Nikon Feb 2015 #66
Well it's a lot better than the Russian one treestar Feb 2015 #56
I am not arguing whether Russia is better than the USofA, I am arguing against censorship on a rhett o rick Feb 2015 #64
You forgot to mention the Propaganda Broadcasting Service (PBS) Major Nikon Feb 2015 #37
RT really isn't like that JonLP24 Feb 2015 #39
RT really is like that Major Nikon Feb 2015 #40
RT covers the criticism JonLP24 Feb 2015 #51
So you have nothing of substance to add except that Sesame Street is like the Hitler Youth? rhett o rick Feb 2015 #45
Sarchasm Major Nikon Feb 2015 #46
If it was an attempt at sarcasm I think you failed. I didn't say that "RT is worthy of equal trust rhett o rick Feb 2015 #47
Who said anything about censor? Major Nikon Feb 2015 #54
Right.. it's from the Guardian so it can't possibly be accurate.. and this has nothing to do with Cha Feb 2015 #49
The Guardian has probably been by far the greatest source regarding this conflict JonLP24 Feb 2015 #52
Interesting "investigative journalism group" Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #3
Same psych-ops group, same con game, same war mongering, same guillable targets. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #6
Exactly. This is not a "Study", which is the first thing that should make people realize this newthinking Feb 2015 #31
"falsely blaming chemical weapons attack on Assad" sorry the only parties guilty of falsehoods geek tragedy Feb 2015 #7
That "evidence" was soundly refuted and rejected Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #9
"the evidence was soundly refuted and rejected" by no one with any credibility geek tragedy Feb 2015 #11
The American people have credibility Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #14
Thinking war was a bad idea is not the same thing as thinking that the Assad regime was geek tragedy Feb 2015 #15
They go hand-in-hand Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #20
The UN and Human Rights Watch reports have all established facts pointing the finger geek tragedy Feb 2015 #28
People are ignorant that this is a continuation of PAX Americana and the International Republican newthinking Feb 2015 #32
.......................... Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #10
He's saying that the ground markings on the Russian side were evidence of artillery use geek tragedy Feb 2015 #13
Right.. according to the Usual Suspects.. Assad and Putin are blameless homophobic despots.. Cha Feb 2015 #50
How do the other so-called "usual suspects" feel about Ukraine's government? JonLP24 Feb 2015 #53
We're glad Svoboda got bounced from the government geek tragedy Feb 2015 #57
yeah, let's take Assad's word for it that the rebels used them even though they didn't have CW. LOL! Bill USA Feb 2015 #12
Saddam's too, while we're at it Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #17
WHAT A LOAD OF FUCKING BULLSHIT DeSwiss Feb 2015 #4
So the U.S. Military is incapable of also discovering this "truth"? Some journalists can? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #5
"doing so could expose the secret intelligence operations involved in making such claims." jakeXT Feb 2015 #8
Translation: MattSh Feb 2015 #29
"This is the best evidence we got"...... Speculation. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #34
Won't be seeing any of the usual suspects in this thread, I promise you Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #16
Just a day or so ago they attempted to murder some CNN guys. joshcryer Feb 2015 #26
Coincidence is not evidence. Speculation is not fact. Wishes are not horses. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #35
Read the link. joshcryer Feb 2015 #41
VIDEO from the link, imagine being on the recieving end. Beautiful countryside: freshwest Feb 2015 #27
Says study....... polly7 Feb 2015 #36
You can clearly hear the round fired nearby. joshcryer Feb 2015 #42
Your friend out west. nt Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2015 #62
Always check your source tech3149 Feb 2015 #58
That you, Pooty? moondust Feb 2015 #61
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia shelled Ukrainians...»Reply #51