Viewing Child Porn on the Web 'Legal' in New York State, Appeals Court Finds

[redqueen]

3. Yes, the last paragraph in the excerpt spells that out.

It's a poor headline, but I couldn't edit it for this forum.

There is some questionable stuff in here though:

All of the judges agreed that child pornography is an abomination, but they disagreed whether it was necessary to "criminalize all use of child pornography to the maximum extent possible," as Ciparick wrote in the majority opinion.



I should add, I do see how that could be interpreted to mean that just a few entries on a cache shoulnt get you locked up, but this guy had thousands, and a few messages for what would seem to me to be the very sort of plausible deniability-providing stuff one would expect from someone who *should* be locked up.

If only it was easy to determine how long the images were viewed, whether they were searched for, whether they were saved, etc.