Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
57. ...and another FAIL.
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 07:16 PM
Nov 2015

You can't find any independent research, can you? LOL.

Would you like to know why?
I KNOW why.
You do NOT.

BTW: In 2006, my wife & I moved to the Woods, far away from Industry and Factory Ag Crops. We raise most of our own food, and keep chickens & honeybees. Naturally, ALL GMOs, as well as non-naturally occurring pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers are forever banned from our little hilltop.
The Bees are happy.
The crops are happy and productive,
and WE are happy.
The taste is AMAZING, we have never been healthier. My wife is a two times cancer survivor who has been in complete remission since we moved here.

YOU keep eating what Monsanto tells you to eat like a good "citizen". LOL. You deserve it.



You must be the one who can point me to Long Term Studies conducted by several, independent research facilities that have published papers in Peer Reviewed Scientific Journals detailing the long term effects of these lab created foods on our health and the health of our environment.

Can't do it, can you.

The really laughable part is that those on DU carrying water for Monsanto and pushing GMOs...NONE can produce independent, peer reviewed, research published in a credible Scientific Journal,
and YET, almost to the man, claim they believe in "SCIENCE", but don't have the first clue about independent research and peer reviewed Journals.. They just repeat what Monsanto tells them to repeat.

So....can't find any peer reviewed independent long term research can you? Remember, these are the same guys who insisted Agent Orange was "safe".
MAN, you are trusting.


Can you find the little lady?


AWWW> Too bad. You missed, but were close.
Lets do it again , double or nothing, you're SURE to win this time:


Here...one more time. Everybody wins on the 3rd time.
Find the little lady:



Aww...too bad again.,
but I'm gonna give you a chance to win all your money back:
Find the Little Lady.







Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cool geomon666 Nov 2015 #1
It is your right. Proceed, citizen. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #2
Thank you geomon666 Nov 2015 #3
Not that you need my permission, you understand. Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #6
So why point out his rights, uh, since he already knows his rights? HuckleB Nov 2015 #7
Because I also have a right to express myself. And don't need a reason or permission. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #8
So you just post for the sake of posting all over the board? HuckleB Nov 2015 #9
Kinda like... these last two posts of yours! villager Nov 2015 #10
Nice try. HuckleB Nov 2015 #14
It is indeed boring, since it's all so entirely predictable, my dear HuckleB. Good holidays to ya..! villager Nov 2015 #15
Indeed, it is predictable. HuckleB Nov 2015 #34
So reliable, HuckleB! Happy Thanksgiving to you! villager Nov 2015 #37
I am reliable, yes. HuckleB Nov 2015 #45
Reliably quoting Dr. Novella's one-man crusade/"skeptic" blog, to boot! Happy Cyber Monday! villager Nov 2015 #46
Yes, one man, reporting the full consensus of the scientific community. HuckleB Nov 2015 #51
Skeptical of everything and everyone except... corporate PR! villager Nov 2015 #56
So now you go to your usual routine of putting words in my mouth. HuckleB Dec 2015 #63
Thanks for keeping this kicked, HuckleB! villager Dec 2015 #65
You really don't like it when I point out the reality that Costco is not acting responsibly. HuckleB Dec 2015 #67
I agree it would be more responsible if they eliminated antibiotic-laden meats, as well villager Dec 2015 #68
Now you're convoluting issues in order to make them seem comparable. HuckleB Dec 2015 #69
Thanks, as ever, for the increased visibility to this thread, Dear HuckleB! villager Dec 2015 #70
No problem. HuckleB Dec 2015 #71
Wow, and a late-breaking concern for systemic, planetary health as well! villager Dec 2015 #72
It's just a restatement of what's already been made clear. HuckleB Dec 2015 #73
And your insistence on always having the last (misplaced, alas) word makes further visible villager Dec 2015 #74
Is there a law against that? Are you the sherif? If so, arrest me if you can, lawman. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #16
So you have no point. HuckleB Nov 2015 #17
Ah, an attention whore. Off to the ignore list with you. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #18
Now that is funny! HuckleB Nov 2015 #23
For the same reason it was pointed out to us that he'll simply buy it somewhere else. LanternWaste Nov 2015 #47
Oh, goodness. HuckleB Nov 2015 #52
There is no evidence to support your claim regarding the first post. Gormy Cuss Dec 2015 #61
Actually, this is not that difficult. HuckleB Dec 2015 #64
Smart stores will market it honestly as a fish with a smaller ecological footprint. HuckleB Dec 2015 #60
Excellent. SoapBox Nov 2015 #4
I like how Costco treats employees, but I still don't buy their salmon. HuckleB Nov 2015 #5
Good! Thanks, Costco for resisting "Soylent Fish" villager Nov 2015 #11
Another reason to love Costco. Blue_In_AK Nov 2015 #12
And they were closed for Thanksgiving n/t TexasBushwhacker Nov 2015 #42
good Marrah_G Nov 2015 #13
They are unable to reproduce with other salmon Major Nikon Nov 2015 #26
Stop confusing things skepticscott Nov 2015 #32
Now if they stop selling meat with hormones & antibiotics,we're making progress 7962 Nov 2015 #19
Can you clarify your concerns with peer-reviewed supporting documentation? HuckleB Nov 2015 #24
Plenty. How much time you got to read them? 7962 Nov 2015 #30
So you have nothing directly relate to this fish. HuckleB Nov 2015 #31
"General concerns?". I thought you asked about antibiotics and hormones 7962 Nov 2015 #38
No, I didn't. HuckleB Nov 2015 #44
What, no bullshit scare tactics skepticscott Nov 2015 #20
Nah. Now it's just "GMO is EVIL. Yeah! Costco!" HuckleB Nov 2015 #25
Awesome winterwar Nov 2015 #21
20 years of research is "rushed." HuckleB Nov 2015 #28
Oh Goody! bvar22 Nov 2015 #39
Ah, and then the goal post game continues. HuckleB Nov 2015 #43
There you go again. bvar22 Nov 2015 #49
I see you've chosen to ignore the reality presented to you. HuckleB Nov 2015 #53
...and another FAIL. bvar22 Nov 2015 #57
Ah, another fail. HuckleB Dec 2015 #58
Imitation is the most sincere formof flattery. bvar22 Dec 2015 #62
You would have to have posted actual content, rather than the usual demonization whims. HuckleB Dec 2015 #66
Proud Costco member here. nt Hekate Nov 2015 #22
Translation: Costco Goes With Fear-Based Marketing, Still Sells E-coli Laden Chicken HuckleB Nov 2015 #27
+1 benh57 Nov 2015 #29
I'd pretend as much too if it were an offense to my own biases. LanternWaste Nov 2015 #48
So you want us to ignore the clear science of the matter? HuckleB Nov 2015 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #33
Good! Floyd Steinberg Nov 2015 #35
So they'll just keep selling conventionally raised salmon that is already killing ocean life? NickB79 Nov 2015 #36
fish farmed, oversized, lardbag GMO hogfish Sunlei Nov 2015 #40
90% of salmon are already farm-raised NickB79 Nov 2015 #41
GMO's is not selective breeding madokie Nov 2015 #50
This explains it quite well. HuckleB Nov 2015 #54
This fish utilizes fewer resources, so it's less expensive, with a smaller ecological footprint. HuckleB Dec 2015 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Costco Joins a Host of Re...»Reply #57