Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trayvon's killer said to make self-incriminating statements [View all]Boabab
(120 posts)I'll educate you: "how life works" is that if you aggressively stalk an innocent individual, who is minding his own business, after being advised not to do so, then end of shooting that person in cold blood after a completely unwarranted confrontation, you don't get to claim "self defense".
All your post has attempted to do, in an extremely lame fashion, is muddy the waters with all sorts of bogus claims which avoid the central issues in this case. An unarmed child was brutally murdered by someone who should never have initiated contact in the first place.
Trying to criminalize the victim in this case is a clear indication that the shooter is indeed guilty, and his amoral defenders are grasping at straws, desperately trying to justify the unjustifiable killing.
Trayvon didn't kill anyone, GZ did. Trayvon did not have a criminal history, GZ did -- with situations involving domestic assault and assault on a police officer.
It is very interesting to note that when faced with the option of receiving a speedy trial, the "innocent" GZ chose to forgo the opportunity to "clear his name" in an expeditious manner, instead opting for more delays. The guilt here could not be more clear.
Lastly, the media needs to butt out of this case now, and let the trial take its course.