Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. cracks down on Americans' intake of sugar, saturated fat [View all]wordpix
(18,652 posts)16. " no evidence that saturated fats are harmful" - totally untrue
Take a look at the CDC and Heart Assoc. websites, not to mention probably hundreds/thousands of studies on the NIH pubmed site. Too many links to post here.
Anyone who thinks saturated fats are not harmful should get a clue. But it's your body---eat all the butter, cream and fatty meats you want, and see what happens.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Very best wishes to you. Yes, eat well and get the nutrients from whole foods, and pesticide free.
trillion
Jan 2016
#46
Because we subsidize sugar, and not fruits and vegetables. We would rather see people kill
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#25
why should the public pay for people to be gluttons/obese when subsidizing health care?
wordpix
Jan 2016
#17
The government will need to pry my Twinkies from my cold, dead (chubby) hands... nt
branford
Jan 2016
#32
I can find 100% organic, no sugar foods in local grocery stores and online, so can you---
wordpix
Jan 2016
#18
Tell people to slow down while taxing them for over $50 billion in sugar subsidy. No wonder
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#22