Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. cracks down on Americans' intake of sugar, saturated fat [View all]jtuck004
(15,882 posts)22. Tell people to slow down while taxing them for over $50 billion in sugar subsidy. No wonder
people think their tax money is being wasted and they have decreasing faith in "government".
.
...The program that supports the American sugar industry has many facets. Most infamous is a subsidy program in which the U.S. Department of Agriculture gives loans to sugar farmers and allows them to repay those loans with raw sugar if sugar prices fall below 20.9 cents per pound. This program functions as an effective mass purchase of sugar, which drives up prices for consumers and thus doubly subsidizes the industry. The USDA then sells this sugar at a steeply discounted price to ethanol producers. Last year the USDA spent $53.3 million on the program. Including the loans that could not be repaid, the government spent $171.5 million.
The government also enforces a system of tariffs and quotas on imported sugar, limiting the supply of cheaper sugar that can be imported from abroad. This results in wide spreads between global and domestic sugar prices. In the absence of protection, consumers and sugar-using producers alike could save several cents a pound on sugar bought from other countries.
...
http://www.economics21.org/commentary/sugar-subsidies-are-bitter-deal-american-consumers
Ouf food stamp program invests about $70 billion a year into keeping people fed, and it's not enough. Let's remove the sugar subsidy and use it to lower the cost of fresh vegetables.
Or just keep being hypocrites.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Very best wishes to you. Yes, eat well and get the nutrients from whole foods, and pesticide free.
trillion
Jan 2016
#46
Because we subsidize sugar, and not fruits and vegetables. We would rather see people kill
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#25
why should the public pay for people to be gluttons/obese when subsidizing health care?
wordpix
Jan 2016
#17
The government will need to pry my Twinkies from my cold, dead (chubby) hands... nt
branford
Jan 2016
#32
I can find 100% organic, no sugar foods in local grocery stores and online, so can you---
wordpix
Jan 2016
#18
Tell people to slow down while taxing them for over $50 billion in sugar subsidy. No wonder
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#22